Advertisement

Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Step-by-Step Approach

  • Alok Shrivastava
  • Mani Menon

Abstract

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is one of the most difficult operations in the field of urology. After the procedure was introduced by Millin in 1947, this technique was adopted by others and modified,1–5 but never gained widespread popularity because of the significant complications of bleeding, incontinence, and impotence. Although anatomic discoveries by Walsh improved the surgeon’s ability to remove all tumor and have substantially improved other outcomes.1 Open radical prostatectomy still remains a procedure with significant morbidity.2

Keywords

Radical Prostatectomy Seminal Vesicle Bladder Neck Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998;160: 2418–2424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alibhai SM, Leach M, Tomlinson G, et al. 30-day mortality and major complications after radical prostatectomy: influence of age and comorbidity. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1525–1532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50: 854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000;163:1643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 2000;55:630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: irrational exuberance? Urology 2001;58:503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168: 945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, et al. Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002;60:569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:701–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhandari A, McIntire L, Kaul SA, et al. Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J Urol 2005;174: 915–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005;174(6):2291–2296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting — the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005;174:269–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175:541–546; discussion, 546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alok Shrivastava
    • 1
  • Mani Menon
    • 2
  1. 1.Vattikuti Urology InstituteHenry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyVattikuti Urology InstituteDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations