Advertisement

Extraperitoneal Access

  • András Hoznek
  • Michael Esposito
  • Laurent Salomon
  • Clement-Claude Abbou
Chapter

Abstract

Initial development of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was based on the experience of a few surgeons with transperitoneal laparoscopic access to the prostate and seminal vesicles.1–3 Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was successfully introduced in routine clinical practice in France following the pioneering work of Gaston and Piéchaud in 1998 (unpublished series). Transperitoneal approach became predominant worldwide and was considered as the gold standard of laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Keywords

Radical Prostatectomy Seminal Vesicle Rectus Muscle Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Transperitoneal Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schuessler WW, Vancaillie TG, Reich H, Griffith DP. Transperitoneal endosurgical lymphadenectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1991;145:988–991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kavoussi LR, Schuessler WW, Vancaillie TG, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic approach to the seminal vesicles. J Urol 1993;150:417–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000;163:1643–1649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001;40: 65–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, et al. The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 2002;20:48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, et al. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:617–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubernard P, Benchetrit S, Chaffange P, Hamza T, Van Box SP. Prostatectomie extrapéritonéale rétrograde laparoscopique (P.E.R.L) avec dissection première des bandelettes vasculo-nerveuses érectiles. Technique simplifiée — à propos de 100 cas. Prog Urol 2003;13:163–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bollens R, Roumeguere T, Quackels T, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Brussels technique. Contemp Urol. 2004;16:13–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruiz L, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Eur Urol 2004;46:50–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stolzenburg J, Truss M, Bekos A, et al. Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy? Curr Urol Rep 2004;5(2):115–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eden CG, King D, Kooiman GG, et al. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter? J Urol 2004;172:2218–2223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown JA, Rodin DM, Lee B, Dahl DM. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases. J Urol 2005; 173:442–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown JA, Rodin D, Lee B, Dahl DM. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases. Urology 2005;65:320–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964–1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001;87: 408–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001; 40:70–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rassweiler J, Frede T, Seemann O, Stock C, Sentker L. Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience. Eur Urol 2001;40:75–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60:864–868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 2003;170:416–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Esposito MP, Ilbeigi P, Ahmed M, Lanteri V. Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: novel technique. Urology 2005;66:649–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 2006;175: 945–950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T, et al. Roboticassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 2003;21:128–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abreu SC, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach. J Urol 2002; 167(suppl 4):19.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, et al. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 2004;171:714–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoznek A, Menard Y, Salomon L, Abbou CC. Update on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:173–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • András Hoznek
    • 1
  • Michael Esposito
    • 2
  • Laurent Salomon
    • 1
  • Clement-Claude Abbou
    • 1
  1. 1.Urology ServiceCHU Henri MondorCréteil-CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of UrologyHackensack University Medical CenterHackensackUSA

Personalised recommendations