Advertisement

Transperitoneal Trocar Placement

  • Justin M. Albani
  • David I. Lee

Abstract

Proper port placement is crucial during conventional laparoscopic surgery. Likewise, during robotic laparoscopic procedures this concept is equally as important. The da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) in its current form consists of a patientside cart with arms that dock to trocars that are preplaced by the surgeon. These arms are rather bulky and require sufficient room to maneuver. An effective port placement situates the arms so that they provide excellent intraabdominal instrument mobility while minimizing arm collisions. This chapter will describe some tips on port placement classified by procedure to help surgeons overcome the learning curve of this preliminary but crucial step to robotic urologic procedures.

Keywords

Urinary Diversion Surgical System Port Placement Camera Port Trocar Placement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A. Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:163–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quint EH, Wang FL, Hurd WW. Laparoscopic transillumination for the location of anterior abdominal wall blood vessels. J Laparoendosc Surg 1996;6:167–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein J, Arora A, Ellis H. Surface anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery in relation to laparoscopic injury. Clin Anat 2004;17:400–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balzer KM, Witte H, Recknagel S, et al. Anatomic guidelines for the prevention of abdominal wall hematoma induced by trocar placement. Surg Radiol Anat 1999;21:87–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee DI, Eichel L, Skarecky DW, et al. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant. Urology 2004;63:1172–1175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hemal AK, Eun D, Tewari A, et al. Nuances in the optimum placement of ports in pelvic and upper urinary tract surgery using the da Vinci robot. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:683–692, viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, et al. Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002;60:569–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:701–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy. Biomed Bull 1984;5:1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pick DL, Lee DI, Skarecky DW, et al. Anatomic guide for port placement for da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2004;18:572–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yohannes P, Puri V, Yi B, et al. Laparoscopyassisted robotic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for muscleinvasive bladder cancer: initial two cases. J Endourol 2003;17:729–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hemal AK, Abol-Enein H, Tewari A, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am2004;31:719–729,viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, et al. Roboticassisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intraabdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2003;44:337–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nervesparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:232–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G, et al. Robotic pyeloplasty: technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:737–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendez-Torres F, Woods M, Thomas R. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2005;19:393–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, et al. Robotassisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol 2005;19: 382–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siddiq FM, Leveillee RJ, Villicana P, et al. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the da Vinci Surgical System. J Endourol 2005;19:387–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubinstein M, Moinzadeh A, Colombo J, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 2005;174 (suppl):V1150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin M. Albani
    • 1
  • David I. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of UrologyPenn Presbyterian Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations