Abstract
The previous chapters have shown the need for providing guidance and a structure for decision-making in situations involving high risks and large uncertainties. To this end we present in this chapter a framework for risk management and decision-making under uncertainty. The framework comprises the following main elements
-
problem definition (challenges, goals and alternatives),
-
stakeholders,
-
concerns that affect the consequence analyses and the value judgements related to these consequences and analyses (frame conditions and constraints),
-
identification of which consequence analyses to execute and execution of these,
-
managerial review and judgement,
-
and the decision.
Risk is defined as the combination of the two basic dimensions: a) possible consequences and b) associated uncertainties. As there are many facets of these dimensions, the framework means a broad perspective on risk, reflecting for example that there might be different assessments of uncertainties, as well as different views on how these uncertainties should be dealt with. This is also reflected by the risk classification scheme adopted, based on the system introduced by Klinke and Renn (2000) and modified by Kristensen and Aven (2004).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliographic Notes
Aven, T. (2003) Foundations of Risk Analysis: A Knowledge and Decision-Oriented Perspective. Wiley, New York.
Aven, T. and Kørte, J. (2003) On the use of cost/benefit analyses and expected utility theory to support decision-making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 79:289–299.
Aven, T., Vinnem, J.E. and Wiencke, H.S. (2006d) A decision framework for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, to appear.
Clemen, R.T. (1996) Making Hard Decisions, 2nd edition. Duxbury Press, New York.
HSE (2001a) Reducing risks, protecting people, HSE’s decision-making process [R2P2]. HSE books, London. http://www.hse.gov.uk/dst/r2p2.pdf
HSE (2001b) Principles and guidelines to assist HSE in its judgements that duty-holders have reduced risk as low as reasonably practicable. HSE books, London. www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarp1.htm
Kastenberg, W., Hauser-Kastenberg, G. and Norris, D. (2004) On developing a risk analysis framework for post-industrial age technologies. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U. and Dang, V.N. (eds). PSAM7. Springer, London, pp. 2378–2383.
Lindley, D.V. (1985) Making Decisions. Wiley, New York.
UKOOA (1999) A framework for risk related decision support — Industry guidelines. UK offshore Operators Association.
Vinnem, J.E., Pedersen, J.I. and Rosenthal, P. (1996) Efficient risk management: use of computerised QRA modell for safety improvements to an existing installation. SPE — paper 35775. 3rd International Conference on HSE, New Orleans, 9–12 june 1996.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). A Risk Management Framework for Decision Support under Uncertainty. In: Risk Management. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-653-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-653-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-652-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-653-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)