Skip to main content

Two-Stage Neural Networks Based Classifier System for Fault Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

This chapter gives a description of a two-stage classifier system for fault diagnosis of industrial processes. The first-stage classifier is used for fault detection and the second one is used for fault isolation and identification. The first stage classifier operates as primary fault detection unit, and it is used to distinguish between normal operating state and abnormal operating states. In order to reduce the number of false alarms, a penalizing factor is introduced in the training error cost function. The second-stage classifier is used to differentiate between different detectable faults. In order to increase the reliability of fault identification, the probabilities of classification performed by this classifier are averaged within the fault duration time. The performance of the proposed approach is validated by application to a valve actuator fault diagnosis problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeli C and Chatzinikolaou A (2004) On-Line Fault Detection Techniques for Technical Systems: A Survey. International Journal of Computer Science & Applications 1(1):12–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldi P and Hornik J (1989) Neural networks and principal component analysis: learning from examples without local minima. Neural Networks 2:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop CM (1996) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Calado JMF, Korbicz J, Patan K, Patton RJ and Sa da Costa JMG (2001) Soft Computing Approaches to Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. European Journal of Control 7:248–286

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen J and Patton RJ (1999) Robust Model-based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang LH, Russell EL and Braatz RD (2001) Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems. Springer Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. DeMers D and Cottrell GW (1993) Non-linear dimensionality reduction. In: Giles CL, Hanson SJ and Cowan JD (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 580–587

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duda RO, Hart PE and Stork DG (2000) Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd Edition

    Google Scholar 

  9. EC FP5 Research Training Network DAMADICS Development and Application of Methods for Actuator Diagnosis in Industrial Control Systems, http://www.eng.hull.ac.uk/research/control/damadics1.htm

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank PM and Ding X (1997) Survey of robust residual generation and evaluation methods in observer-based fault detection systems. Journal of Process Control 7(6):403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haussler D (1992) Decision theoretic generalisations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications. Information and Computation 100:78–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Isermann R (1997) Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods — an introduction. Control Engineering Practice 5(5):639–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isermann R, Schwartz R and Stoltz S (2002) Fault-Tolerant Drive-By-Wire Systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 22(5):64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jollife IT (1986) Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lipnickas A, Korbicz J (2004) Adaptive Selection of Neural Networks for a Committee Decision. International Scientific Journal of Computing 3(2):23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lipnickas A, Sa da Costa J and Bocaniala C (2004) FDI based on two stage classifiers for fault diagnosis of valve actuators. Application to DAMADICS benchmark. In: Proceeding of the 11th International Conference EPEPEMC’2004, 2–4 September, Riga, Latvia, vol. 3, pp. 147–153

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michie D, Spiegelhalter DJ and Taylor CC (1994) Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. Ellis Horwood, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Narendra KS and Parthasarthy K (1990) Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1(1):4–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patton RJ, Lopez-Toribio CJ, Uppal FJ (1999) Artificial intelligence approaches to fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. International Journal of applied mathematics and computer science 9(3):471–518

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raudys Å  (2001) Statistical and Neural Classifiers: An Integrated Approach to Design. Advances in Pattern Recognition. Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teeuwsen SP, Erlich I and El-Sharkawi MA (2002) Feature reduction for neural network based small-signal stability assessment. In: Proceedings of the 14th PSCC, Sevilla, 24–28 June, session 14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trunov A and Polycarpou M (2000) Automated Fault Diagnosis in Nonlinear Multivariable Systems Using a Learning Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11(1):91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Verikas A and Bacauskiene M (2002) Feature selection with neural networks. Pattern Recognition Letters 23:1323–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verikas A and Gelzinis A (2000) Training neural networks by stochastic optimisation. Neurocomputing 30: 153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Verikas A and Lipnickas A (2002) Fusing neural networks through space partitioning and fuzzy integration. Neural Processing Letters 16(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wan E (1990) Neural network classification: A Bayesian interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1(4):303–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang LX (1992) Fuzzy systems are universal approximators. In: Proceedings of IEEE Fuzzy Systems Conference, pp. 1163–1170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lipnickas, A. (2006). Two-Stage Neural Networks Based Classifier System for Fault Diagnosis. In: Palade, V., Jain, L., Bocaniala, C.D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-631-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-631-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-343-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-631-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics