Abstract
The first distinction to be considered is between slips/lapses and mistakes. (1990) defined error as ‘the failure of planned actions to achieve their desired ends — without the intervention of some unforeseeable event’. In these terms, while a slip represents a problem with the execution of a good plan, a mistake involves an inappropriate or incorrect plan that is correctly executed. Slips and mistakes map directly onto (1974, 1990) differentiation of three levels of human performance. According to Rasmussen’s model, the cognitive mode in which people operate changes as the task performed becomes more familiar, from the knowledge-based through the rule-based to the skill-based level. The three levels are not mutually exclusive, but represent a progression, leading to skilled performance. Knowledge-based performance, which involves consciously thinking the task through, is relevant when the task faced is novel and conscious effort must be made to construct a plan of action from stored knowledge. Knowledgebased performance is necessary if you are planning to drive to a destination never previously visited. Errors at this level of performance are mistakes, arising from incorrect knowledge or from the limitations of cognitive resources. Moreover, decision making itself is subject to a range of biases (Parker and Lawton, 2003). For example, Kahneman and Tverskys’ classic laboratory experiments identified the availability bias, referring to the fact that probability judgements (e.g., judgements of the likelihood of having a car accident) are strongly influenced by the ease with which past cases can be recalled (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dollard, J., Miller, N.E., Doob, L.W., Mowrer, O.H. and Sears, R.R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Johnson, P. and Gill, J. (1993). Management control and organizational behaviour. Paul Chapman, London.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgements under uncertainty. Science 185, 1124–1131.
Lajunen, T. and Parker, D. (2001). Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 243–255.
Lajunen, T., Parker, D. and Summala, H. (1999). Does traffic congestion increase driver aggression? Transportation Research Part F, 2, 225–236.
Lawton, R. (1998). Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science, 28, 77–95.
Lawton, R.L., Parker, D., Stradling, S.G. and Manstead, A.S.R. (1997). The role of affect in predicting social behaviors: The case of road traffic violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1258–1276.
Lajunen, T., Parker, D. and Summala, H. (2004). The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: A cross-cultural study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(2), 231–238.
Parker, D. and Lawton, R. (2003). A psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in healthcare. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 12, 453–457.
Parker, D., Reason, J.T., Manstead, A.S.R. and Stradling, S.G. (1995a). Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38, 1036–1048.
Parker, D., West, R.W., Stradling, S.G. and Manstead, A.S.R. (1995b). Behavioural characteristics and involvement in different types of road traffic accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 571–581.
Parker, D., Lajunen, T. and Summala H. (2002). Anger and aggression among drivers in three European countries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(2), 229–235.
Rasmussen, J. (1990). Human error and the problem of causality in analysis of accidents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 327, 449–460.
Rasmussen, J. and Jensen, A. (1974). Mental procedures in real-life tasks: A case study of electronic troubleshooting. Ergonomics, 17, 293–307.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Open University Press, Cambridge.
Reason, J., Parker, D. and Lawton, R. (1998). The varieties of rule-related behaviour. Journal of Organisational and Occupational Psychology, 71, 289–304.
Reason, J.T., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J.S., Parker, D. and Kelemen, D. (1989). A report to the TRRL on Research Contract 9885/35. The social and cognitive determinants of aberrant driver behaviour. Unpublished report.
Reason, J.T., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, James, S. and Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10/11), 1315–1332.
Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Wright, S. and Crundall, D. (1999). Anger while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2F(1), 55–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parker, D. (2007). Driver Error and Crashes. In: Cacciabue, P.C. (eds) Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-617-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-618-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)