Skip to main content

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance

  • Chapter
Clinical Trials in Osteoporosis

Part of the book series: Clinical Trials ((CLINICAL))

  • 737 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical trial quality assurance (QA) covers a whole range of issues in bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. In addition to the regular review of quality control procedures, it also encompasses adequate subject preparation, technologist preparation, observance of rigorous scanning and analysis protocols, and the use of regular, organized data shipments to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) QA centres. All members of the research team should regard these aspects as necessary and important considerations both at the time of clinical trial set-up and throughout the duration of the trial. It is only by implementing and maintaining clear, organized protocols and procedures that accurate and reproducible BMD data will be obtained. Although it is primarily the densitometer technologist who will be responsible for ensuring subject data is adequately acquired, principal investigators and study monitors have a role in ensuring that the technologist is adequately prepared and included as a member of the clinical trial team. The preparation will include both relevant training and trial documentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jergas, M. and Genant, H.K. (1997). Lateral dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: Current status. Bone 20:4311–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake, G.M., Herd, R.J.M. and Fogelman, I. (1996). A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: A comparison with posterior spine, hip and total-body DXA. Osteoporos Int 6:462–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Formica, C.A. (1999). Total body bone mineral and body composition by absorptiometry. In: Blake, G.M., Wahner, H.W. and Fogelman, I. (eds). The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Ultrasound in Clinical Practice, 2nd edn, p. 313–46. London: Martin Dunitz.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wahner, H.W. and Fogelman, I. (1994). The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice, p. 49–74. London: Martin Dunitz.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lunar DPX-L Operators Manual Documentation Version 8/93. Madison: Lunar Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lunar Expert-XL User’s Guide Documentation Version 2/98 1. Madison: Lunar Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hologic QDR 2000 Operators Manual and User’s Guide. Hologic System Software Version 7.10. Document Number 080-0384 Revision A. Bedford: Hologic Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Masud, T., Langley, S., Wiltshire, P. et al. (1993). Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis. BMJ 307:172–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, G., Peacock, M., Eilam, O. et al. (1997). Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 7(6):564–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross, P.D., Davis, J.W., Epstein, R.S. et al. (1992). Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 51:95–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross, P.D., Yhee, Y.K., He, Y.F. et al. (1993). A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis. J Bone Miner Res 8:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Klotzbuecher, C.M., Ross, P.D., Landsman, P.B. et al. (2000). Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. Technology Appraisal 87 (2005). London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/TA087guidance.pdf accessed 20/11/06

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steiger, P., Cummings, S.R., Genant, H.K. et al. and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (1994). Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: Correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography. Osteoporos Int 4:238–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rea, J.A., Steiger, P., Blake, G. et al. (1998). Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 13(3):464–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cawte, S.A. (1999). Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry using the Hologic QDR 2000, MPhil thesis. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004). Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7:27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Management of Osteoporosis (2003). Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/71/index.html accessed 20/11/06

    Google Scholar 

  19. Genant, H.K., Wu, C.Y., van Kuijk, C. et al. (1993). Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blunt, B.A., Jones, D., Svenson, R.K. et al. (1998). Good clinical practice and audits for dual X-ray absorptiometry and X-ray imaging laboratories and quality assurance centres involved in drug trials, private practice, and research. J Clin Densitometry 1(4):323–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald, V. (1994). Surviving an FDA audit. Clin Res Focus 5(2):12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Earnshaw, S.A. (2007). Clinical Trial Quality Assurance. In: Pearson, D., Miller, C.G. (eds) Clinical Trials in Osteoporosis. Clinical Trials. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-587-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-587-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-389-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-587-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics