Advertisement

Interpretations of Amputation by Society, Patients and Surgeons

Summary

It is postulated that mankind’s acceptance of amputees is necessary before elective surgical amputations are undertaken. Even so, some societies do not countenance elective surgery, usually for religious reasons, despite the presence of amputees of congenital, traumatic and punitive or legal origin sanctioned by the same societies. Hence, the wish of a patient to live with three limbs than to die with four, even with the acquiescence of a surgeon, carries no weight unless supported by their communities.

Before anaesthesia, painful amputation was often endured stoically, paradoxically bolstered by intense religious conviction. For the surgeon, the former dilemmas concerning if, when and where to amputate, and how to alleviate pain, prevent haemorrhage and infection, have diminished by utilising modern supportive measures. Limb reimplantation is now possible, although not always successful.

Keywords

Gunshot Wound Legal Origin Railway Wagon Military Surgeon Wagon Wheel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rivers WHR. Medicine, Magic, and Religion. London: Kegan Paul, 1924:1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodall J. The Surgions Mate. London: Lisle, 1617:2.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fergusson W. A System of Practical Surgery. London: Churchill, 1857:196.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harley GW. Native African Medicine: With Special Reference to Its Practice in the Mano Tribe of Liberia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941:40.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordon CA. Our Trip to Burmah. London: Balliere, 1877:228–232.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniell WF. Sketches of Medical Topography and Native Diseases of the Gulf of Guinea and West Africa. London: Highley, 1849:115.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    London Times report, November 5, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coupland RM. Amputation for War Wounds. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hilton-Simpson MW. Arab Medicine and Surgery. A Study of the Healing Arts in Algeria. London: Oxford University Press, 1922:40.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Von Gersdorff H. Feldbuch der Wundarztney (translated by L.M. Zimmerman). Strassburg: Schott, 1517. Veith I. Great Ideas in the History of Surgery. New York: Dover, 1967:215.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clowes W. A Profitable and Necessarie Booke of Observations. London: Bollifan, 1596:93.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirk R. Medical report on the Kingdom of Shoa. Trans Med Phys Soc Bombay 1843;6:16.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woodall J. The Surgions Mate. London: Lisle, 1617:173–175.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas A, Haddan CC. Amputation Prosthesis. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1945:270.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kenneth Stone, personal communication, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiseman R. Several Chirurgical Treatises. London: Royston, 1686:420.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryder H. New Practical Observations in Surgery. London: Partridge, 1685:91–92.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Legg S (editor). Trafalgar: an Eye-Witness Account of a Great Battle. London: Hart Davis, 1966:100. Cited by Stanley P. For Fear of Pain: British Surgery, 1790-1850. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003:104.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryder H. New Practical Observations in Surgery. London: Partridge, 1685:53–57.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abernethy J. Introductory Lectures Exhibiting Some of Mr Hunter’s Opinions Respecting Life Diseaeses. London: Longman, 1819:62n. Cited by Stanley P. For Fear of Pain: British Surgery, 1790-1850. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003:254.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beckett JV. Illness and amputation in the eighteenth century: the case of Sir James Lowther 1673-1755. Med Hist 1980;24:88–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prewer RR. Charles Bernard and Edward Thwaites: two scholars at an amputation. J Med Biog 1993;1: 241–247.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petit J-L. Oeuvres Complètes. Paris: Dans Toutes les Librairies Médicales, 1837:844–845.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peirce J. An Account of a very extraordinary Tumour in the Knee of a Person, whose Leg was taken off by Mr. Jer. Peirce, Surgeon at Bath. Philos Trans 1737;452:1–4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    London Times, obituary of Brigadier Smith and account of Captain Crawford’s amputation, March 10, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anonymous. One leg commando. Assist Technol 2004;40:17.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paré A. The Workes. London: Cotes & Young, 1634:303. Malgaigne MJF. Manuel de Médecine Opératoire. Paris: Germar Baillière, 1874, 529.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cox WS. A Memoir on Amputation of the Thigh, at the Hip-Joint. London: Reeve, 1845:33.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duhamel G. La Vie des Martyrs 1914-1916 (translated by the author). Paris: Mercure, 1917.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hart BHL (editor). The Letters of Private Wheeler. London: Joseph, 1951:153.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Waterford Disability Network. www.waterforddisability.comGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aldea PA, Shaw WW. “A historical perspective on the changing methods of management for major trauma of the lower extremity” Surg Gyree Obstet 1987;165:554.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paré A. The Workes. London: Cotes & Young, 1634: 278.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bilguer Mons. Dissertation sur l’Inutilité de l’Amputation des Membres. Paris: Didot, 1764.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hart BHL (editor). The Letters of Private Wheeler. London: Joseph, 1951:152.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Crumplin MKH, Starling P. A Surgical Artist at War: The Paintings and Sketches of Sir Charles Bell 1809-1815. Edinburgh: Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 2005:92.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mitra SM. Life & letters of Sir John Hall. London: Longmans, 1911:315.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watson AB. Listeris system of aseptic wound treatment versus its modifications. Trans Am Surg Assoc 1883;1:204–223.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Helfet DL. Watson-Jones Lecture. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77B(suppl 1):1.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gurlt E. Geschichte der Chirurgie vol 3. Barlin: Hirschwald, 1898:49.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Woodall J. The Surgeons Mate. London: Bourne, 1639.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Personalised recommendations