Skip to main content

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of death from cancer in both the UK and the US. The incidence increases with age, and the disease is much more common in Western industrialized countries that have a high-fat, low-fiber diet. In most cases, CRC develops over a period of years in a preexisting adenomatous polyp (the “adenoma-carcinoma sequence”). Knowledge of this pathway has led to the development of screening programs using colonoscopy or barium enema. The size of the polyp determines the risk of malignant change; only a small percentage of polyps will develop into cancers. Those less than 1cm have less than a 1% chance of containing malignant cells, whereas half of those over 2cm are malignant. Approximately 3% of patients with colorectal cancer will have a second or synchronous tumor at the time of presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 5

  • Delbelke D, Vitola J, Sandler MP, et al. Staging recurrent colorectal carcinoma with PET. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1196–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donckier V, Van Laethem JL, Goldman S, et al. FDG-PET as a tool for early recognition of incomplete tumor destruction after radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2003;84:215–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drenth JP, Nagengast FM, Oyen WJ. Evaluation of premalignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of FDG-PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1766–1769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H, et al. Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 2004;232:815–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez FG, Drebin JA, Linehan DC, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Strasberg SM. Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). Ann Surg 2004;240:438–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan FL, Dehdashti F, Ogunbiyi OA, et al. Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained plasma CEA evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998;227:319–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fong Y, Saldinger P, Akhurst T, et al. Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Am J Surg 1999;178:282–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition. New York: Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heriot AG, Hicks RJ, Drummond EG, et al. Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:451–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heubner RH, Park KC, Sheperd JE, et al. A meta-analysis of the literature for whole body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1177–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ. 18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung and colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2003;44:224–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai DT, Fulham M, Stephen MS, et al. The role of whole body positron emission tomography with FDG in identifying operable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. Arch Surg 1996;131:703–707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M. Diffusely increased colonic F-18 FDG uptake in acute enterocolitis. Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:434–435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiepers C, Penninckx F, De Vadder N, et al. Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995;21:517–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, McCormack L, Kadry Z, Clavien PA. Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 2004;240:1027–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, Conti PS. Incidental colonic FDG uptake: correlation with colonoscopy and histopathology. Radiology 2002;224:783–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clarke, J. (2007). Colorectal Cancer. In: PET/CT in Clinical Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-504-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-504-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-504-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics