Advertisement

Record Length, Spontaneous Variability and Suppression of Ectopic Ventricular Complex Activity by Drugs

Abstract

The first part of this chapter covers the dependence of the observed ectopic ventricular complex (EVC) prevalence on the recording length and the second part considers the influence of spontaneous variability of EVC on the ability to detect a drug effect on EVC suppression efforts.

Keywords

Cent Reduction Record Length Count Ratio Ventricular Premature Complex Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morganroth J, Michelson EL, Horowitz LN et al. Limitations of routine long-term electrocardiographic monitoring to assess ventricular ectopic frequency. Circulation 1978;58:408–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pratt CM, Slymen DJ, Wierman AM et al. Analysis of the spontaneous variability of ventricular arrhythmias: Consecutive ambulatory electrocardiographic recording of ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toivonen L. Spontaneous variability in the frequency of ventricular premature complexes over prolonged intervals and implications for antiarrhythmic treatment. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:608–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sami M, Kraemer H, Harrison DC et al. A new method for evaluating antiarrhythmic drug efficacy. Circulation 1980;62:1172–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmidt G, Ulm K, Barthel P et al. Spontaneous variability of simple and complex ventricular premature contractions during long time intervals in patients with severe organic heart disease. Circulation 1988;78:296–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt G, Morfill GE, Barthel P et al. Variability of ventricular premature complexes and mortality risk. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:976–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Personalised recommendations