Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics Diagnostics: Methods, Equipment and Analysis Tools

  • Chapter
Machining Dynamics

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

Abstract

There are two reasons why it is important to diagnose, identify, or analyse the dynamic behaviour of machine tools. Firstly, the many techniques that can be used to optimise the machining process invariably require some model of the structural dynamics. This is especially true for the problem of avoiding unstable chatter vibrations, and for predicting the surface finish. Knowledge of the structure’s natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios can be used to predict the cutting performance (i.e., chatter stability and geometrical accuracy), and to choose optimal values for the spindle speed and depth of cut. Such techniques could be described as pre-process techniques, because the dynamics testing is carried out before the machining process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shiraishi, M. Scope in in–process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes – part 1: In–process techniques for tools. Precision Engineering, 1989. 10(4): p. 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiraishi, M. Scope in in–process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes – part 2: In–process techniques for workpieces. Precision Engineering, 1989. 11(1): p. 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiraishi, M. Scope in in–process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes – part 3: In–process techniques for cutting processes and machine tools. Precision Engineering, 1989. 11(1): p. 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Axinte, DA, Gindy, N, Fox, K, and Unanue, I. Process monitoring to assist the workpiece surface quality in machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2004. 44(10): p. 1091–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, D–W, Lee, SJ, and Chu, CN. The state of machining process monitoring research in Korea. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1999. 39(11): p. 1697–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maia, NMM and Silva, JMM, Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. 1997, London: Research Studies Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Altintas, Y, Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ewins, DJ, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, and Application. 2000, London: Research Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balmès, E. Structural Dynamics Toolbox. SDTOOLS, Paris, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tlusty, J, Manufacturing Processes and Equipment. 1999, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitz, TL. Predicting high–speed machining dynamics by substructure analysis. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 2000. 49(1): p. 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, SS, Altintas, Y, and Movahhedy, M. Receptance coupling for end mills. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2003. 43(9): p. 889–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, S and Tlusty, J. Update on High–Speed Milling Dynamics. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1990. 112: p. 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oppenheim, AV and Schafer, RW, Discrete–Time Signal Processing. 1989, Prentice–Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 713–718.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sims, ND, Bayly, PV, and Young, KA. Piezoelectric sensors and actuators for milling tool stability lobes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005. 281(3–5): p. 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Snyder, JP, Davies, M, Pratt, J, and Smith, S. A New Stable Speed Test Apparatus for Milling. Transactions of NAMRI/SME, 2001. 24: p. 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitz, TL, Davies, MA, Medicus, K, and Snyder, J. Improving high–speed machining material removal rates by rapid dynamic analysis. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 2001. 50(1): p. 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tlusty, J and Andrews, GC. Critical review of sensors for unmanned machining. CIRP Annals, 1983. 32(2): p. 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soliman, E and Ismail, F. Chatter detection by monitoring spindle drive current. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1997. 13(1): p. 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McBride, R, Carolan, TA, Barton, JS, Wilcox, SJ, Borthwick, WKD, and Jones, JDC. Detection of acoustic emission in cutting processes by fibre optic interferometry. Measurement Science and Technology. 1993. 4(10): p. 1122–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Delio, T, Tlusty, J, and Smith, S. Use of audio signals for chatter detection and control. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions of the ASME, 1992. 114(2): p. 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bayly, PV, Lamar, MT, and Calvert, SG. Low–frequency regenerative vibration and the formation of lobed holes in drilling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2002. 124(2): p. 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mann, BP, Bartow, MJ, Young, KA, Bayly, PV, and Schmitz, TL. Machining accuracy due to tool or workpiece vibrations. in ASME Mechanical Engineering Congress Exposition. 2003. Washington, DC., United States: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY 10016–5990, United States. 14: p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dohner, JL, et al., Mitigation of chatter instabilities in milling by active structural control. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004. 269(1–2): p. 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weck, M, Verhaag, E, and Gather, M. Adaptive control for face–milling operations with strategies for avoiding chatter vibrations and for automatic cut distribution. CIRP Annals, 1975. 24–1: p. 405–409.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bartow, MJ, Bayly, PV, and Mann, BP. Fiber Bragg grating sensors for measurement of tool displacement. in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress Exposition. 2004. Anaheim, CA, United States: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY 10016–5990, United States. 15: p. 941.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sims, ND. The self–excitation damping ratio: a chatter criterion for time–domain milling simulations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2005. 127(3): p. 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Y and Sims, ND. Milling workpiece chatter avoidance using piezoelectric active damping: a feasibility study. Smart Materials and Structures, 2005. 14: p. N65–N70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmitz, TL, Medicus, K, and Dutterer, B. Exploring once–per–revolution audio signal variance as a chatter indicator. Machining Science and Technology, 2002. 6(2): p. 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nayfeh, A and Balachandran, B, Applied Nonlinear Dynamics: Analytical, Computational and Experimental Methods. 1994: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Welch, PD. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., 1967. AU–15: p. 70–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Mann, BP, Young, KA, Schmitz, TL, and Dilley, DD. Simultaneous stability and surface location error in milling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005. 127(3): p. 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MetalMax Harmonizer. Manufacturing Laboratories, Inc, Las Vegas, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, XQ, Wong, YS, and Nee, AYC. Tool wear and chatter detection using the coherence function of two crossed accelerations. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 1997. 37(4): p. 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kondo, E, Ota, H, and Kawai, T. A new method to detect regenerative chatter using spectral analysis, Part 1: basic study on criteria for detection of chatter. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1997. 119(4(A)): p. 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, S and Tlusty, J. Stabilizing chatter by automatic spindle speed regulation. CIRP Annals, 1992. 41: p. 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. El Hafsi, M and Yeralan, S. Computer control system for a metal cutting machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1992. 23(1–4): p. 345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith, S and Delio, T. Sensor–based chatter detection and avoidance by spindle speed. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 1992. 114(3): p. 486–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Altintas, Y and Munasinghe, WK. Modular CNC design for intelligent machining, Part 2: Modular integration of sensor based milling process monitoring and control tasks. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 1996. 118(4): p. 514–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Balachandran, B. Nonlinear dynamics of milling processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Part A, 2001. 359: p. 793–819.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Pratt, JR and Nayfeh, AH. Chatter control and stability analysis of a cantilever boring bar under regenerative cutting conditions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Part A, 2001. 359: p. 759–792.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmitz, TL and Davies, MA, Method and device for avoiding chatter during machine tool operation, US Patent and Trademark Office. 2002, 20020146296

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bayly, PV, Mann, BP, Schmitz, TL, Peters, DA, Stepan, G, and Insperger, T. Effects of radial immersion and cutting direction on chatter stability in end milling. in ASME International Congress and Exposition. 2002. 13: p. 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Campomanes, ML and Altintas, Y. An improved time domain simulation for dynamic milling at small radial immersions. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2003. 125: p. 416–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. CutPro. Manufacturing Automation Laboratories, Inc, Vancouver, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rioul, O and Vetterli, M. Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 1991. 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mallat, S, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. 1998, London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Khraisheh, MK, Pezeshki, C, and Bayoumi, AE. Time series based analysis for primary chatter in metal cutting. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1995. 180(1): p. 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Berger, BS, Minis, I, Harley, J, Rokni, M, and Papadopoulos, M. Wavelet based cutting state identification. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998. 213(5): p. 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Choi, T and Shin, YC. On–line chatter detection using wavelet–based parameter estimation. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2003. 125(1): p. 21–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Yoon, MC and Chin, DH. Cutting force monitoring in the endmilling operation for chatter detection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2005. 219(6): p. 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tansel, IN, Wagiman, A, and Tziranis, A. Recognition of chatter with neural networks. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1991. 31(4): p. 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tarng, YS and Chen, MC. Intelligent sensor for detection of milling chatter. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1994. 5(3): p. 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Li, XQ, Wong, YS, and Nee, AYC. Comprehensive identification of tool failure and chatter using a parallel multi–ART2 neural network. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 1998. 120(2): p. 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fansen, K, Junyi, Y, and Xiaoqin, Z. Analysis of fuzzy dynamic characteristics of machine cutting process: fuzzy stability analysis in regenerative–type–chatter. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1999. 39(8): p. 1299–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sim, WM, Dewes, RC, and Aspinwall, DK. An integrated approach to the high–speed machining of moulds and dies involving both a knowledge–based system and a chatter detection and control system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2002. 216(12): p. 1635–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu, Q, Chen, X, and Gindy, N. Fuzzy pattern recognition of AE signals for grinding burn. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2005. 45(7–8): p. 811–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gradisek, J, Govekar, E, and Grabec, I. Using coarse–grained entropy rate to detect chatter in cutting. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998. 214(5): p. 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gradisek, J, Baus, A, Govekar, E, Klocke, F, and Grabec, I. Automatic chatter detection in grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2003. 43(14): p. 1397–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Berger, B, Belai, C, and Anand, D. Chatter identification with mutual information. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003. 267(1): p. 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre with Boeing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, S1 3JD, Sheffield, UK

    Neil D. Sims

Authors
  1. Neil D. Sims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, UB8 3PH, Middlesex, UK

    Kai Cheng

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sims, N. (2009). Dynamics Diagnostics: Methods, Equipment and Analysis Tools. In: Cheng, K. (eds) Machining Dynamics. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-368-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-368-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-367-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-368-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation