Skip to main content

Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Primary Care: Epidemology and Risk Factors

  • Chapter
Urogynecology in Primary Care
  • 745 Accesses

Abstract

Urinary and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and female sexual dysfuction are increasingly common conditions and fall in the realm of pelvic floor dysfunction. It is unclear if the true incidence of these conditions is increasing or if they are being detected more physicians, patients and the media to address them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thom, D. Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc., 1998; 46:473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown MB et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urology. 1986;136:1022–1025.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A et al. Epidemiology of faecal and urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Incontinence. 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd ed. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (ed). Plymouth, UK: Health Publication, Ltd., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hampel C, Wienhold D, Benken N et al. Prevalence and natural history of female incontinence. Eur Urol. 1997;32(Suppl 2):3–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melville Jl, Katon W, Delaney K et al. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Intern Med. 2005;165:537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fultz NH, Herzog AR. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in middle-aged and older women: a survey-based methodological experiment. J Aging Health. 2000;12(4):459–469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sampselle CM, Harlow SD, Skurnick J et al. Urinary incontinence predictors and life impact in ethnically diverse perimenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1230–1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Viktrup L, Lose G, Rolff M et al. The symptom of stress incontinence caused by pregnancy or delivery in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:945–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB et al. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:770–779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:440–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foldspang A, Mommsen S, Lam GW et al. Parity as a correlate of adult female urinary incontinence prevalence. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1992;46: 595–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Milsom I, Ekelund P, Molander U et al. The infl uence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy, and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women. J Urol. 1993;149:1459–1462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg RP, Abramov Y, Botros S et al. Delivery mode is a major environmental determinant of stress urinary incontinence: results of the Evanston-Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:2149–2153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rortviet G, Hannestad YS, Daltveit AK et al. Ageand type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thom DH, Brown JS. Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for urinary incontinence in later life: a review of clinical and epidemiologic literature. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1998;46:1411–1417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendrix SL, Cochrane BB, Nygaard IE et al. Effects of estrogen with and without progestin on urinary incontinence. JAMA. 2005;23(293):935–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;82:327–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. BJU Int. 2002;89:61–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ et al. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in communitydwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Talley NJ; O’Keefe EA; Zinsmeister AR et al. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1992;102: 895–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson R; Furner S; Jesudason V. Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1226–1229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eva UF, Gun W, Preben K. Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:280–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Drossman DA; Li Z; Andruzzi E et al. US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1569–1580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Lingman G. Anal sphincter function after delivery: a prospective study in women with sphincter rupture and controls. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990;35:7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan AH; Kamm MA; Hudson CN et al. Analsphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;23(329):1905–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Hermann AP. Longterm effect of vaginal deliveries on anorectal function in normal perimenopausal women. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:852–859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S et al. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;104:1397–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Ling L. Anal sphincter competence in healthy women: clinical implications of age and other factors. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(5 Pt 1): 823–827.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E et al. Communitybased prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995 16(274):559–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Quander CR, Morris MC, Melson J et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:905–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;83:277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Women’s Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:489–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192:795–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Swift SE, Pound T, Dias JK. Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:187–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol. 2000;183:888–893.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rinne KM, Kirkinen PP. What predisposes young women to genital prolapse? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;84:23–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol. 2000;163:888–893.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Geiss IM, Umek WH, Dungl A et al. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in gynecologic and urogynecologic patients according to the international consensus classification. Urology. 2003;62:514–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nazareth I, Boynton P, King M. Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;23;327:423–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Graziottin A, Koochaki P. Distress associated with low sexual desire in women in four EU countries. Maturitas. 2003;44(Suppl 2):S116.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW et al. Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:751–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. Sexuality in middle and later life. Available at: http://www.siecus.org/pubs/fact/ fact0018.html.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pauls R, Kleeman S, Karram M. Female sexual dysfunction: principles of diagnosis and therapy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:196–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Davis SR. When to suspect androgen deficiency other than at menopause. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(Suppl 4):S68–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Judd HL, Lucas WE, Yen SS. Effect of oophorectomy on circulating testosterone and androstenedione levels in patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;118:793–798.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Keshavarz H, Hills SD, Kieke BA et al. Hysterectomy surveillance-United States, 1994–1999. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2002;51:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Walters MD, Karram MM, eds. Urogynecology & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rajan, S.S., Kohli, N. (2007). Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Primary Care: Epidemology and Risk Factors. In: Culligan, P.J., Goldberg, R.P. (eds) Urogynecology in Primary Care. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-167-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-167-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-166-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-167-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics