Skip to main content

The Science of Shock and Fluid Resuscitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urological Emergencies

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 1534 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to review the leading causes of shock in the surgical patient and to guide the clinician in the diagnosis and management of shock in this population. Shock represents a state of inadequate tissue perfusion, which needs to be recognized and treated promptly to avoid organ injury. The leading causes of shock reviewed include hypovolemic shock, septic shock, and cardiogenic shock. Special focus is given to recent data including early goal-directed therapy for septic shock resuscitation and management of the patient requiring a massive transfusion. Fluid resuscitation strategies and endpoints for resuscitation are also reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sihler KC, Nathens AB. Management of severe sepsis in the surgical patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(6):1457–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barron ME, Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. A systematic review of the comparative safety of colloids. Arch Surg. 2004;139(5):552–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mapstone J, Roberts I, Evans P. Fluid resuscitation strategies: a systematic review of animal trials. J Trauma. 2003;55(3):571–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickell WH et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(17):1105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts K et al. Hypotensive resuscitation in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(4):339–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Vliet JA et al. Hypotensive hemostasis (permissive hypotension) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: are we really in control? Vascular. 2007;15(4):197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobias TA et al. Comparative effects of 7.5% NaCl in 6% Dextran 70 and 0.9% NaCl on cardiorespiratory parameters after cardiac output-controlled resuscitation from canine hemorrhagic shock. Circ Shock. 1993;39(2):139–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kien ND et al. Cardiac contractility and blood flow distribution following resuscitation with 7.5% hypertonic saline in anesthetized dogs. Circ Shock. 1991;35(2):109–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bulger EM et al. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(13):1455–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulger E et al. Hypertonic resuscitation of hypovolemic shock after blunt trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2008;143:39–148.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bulger EM et al. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011;253(3):431–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inflammation and host response to injury clinical guidelines [cited 30 Sept 2009]. Available from: http://www.gluegrant.org/clinical-protocols.htm.

  13. Hess JR et al. The coagulopathy of trauma: a review of mechanisms. J Trauma. 2008;65(4):748–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hess JR, Holcomb JB, Hoyt DB. Damage control resuscitation: the need for specific blood products to treat the coagulopathy of trauma. Transfusion. 2006;46(5):685–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Borgman MA et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2007;63(4):805–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez EA et al. Fresh frozen plasma should be given earlier to patients requiring massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2007;62(1):112–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borgman MA et al. The effect of FFP: RBC ratio on morbidity and mortality in trauma patients based on transfusion prediction score. Vox Sang. 2011;101(1):44–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Holcomb JB et al. Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248(3):447–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunter Jr OL et al. Optimizing outcomes in damage control resuscitation: identifying blood product ratios associated with improved survival. J Trauma. 2008;65(3):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Inaba K et al. The impact of platelet transfusion in massively transfused trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(5):573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunez TC et al. Creation, implementation, and maturation of a massive transfusion protocol for the exsanguinating trauma patient. J Trauma. 2010;68(6):1498–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holcomb JB. Optimal use of blood products in severely injured trauma patients. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010:465–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brasel KJ, Weigelt JA. Damage control in trauma surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2000;6(4):276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rivers E et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bannon MP et al. Central venous oxygen saturation, arterial base deficit, and lactate concentration in trauma patients. Am Surg. 1995;61(8):738–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Callaway DW et al. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality in normotensive elderly blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009;66(4):1040–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Husain FA et al. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg. 2003;185(5):485–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore FA et al. Inflammation and the host response to injury, a large-scale collaborative project: patient-oriented research core-standard operating procedures for clinical care III. Guidelines for shock resuscitation. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):82–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen M. Bulger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bulger, E.M. (2013). The Science of Shock and Fluid Resuscitation. In: Wessells, H. (eds) Urological Emergencies. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-423-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-423-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-422-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-423-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics