Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Ureteroscopy pp 419–434Cite as

Complications of Ureteroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

Ureteroscopy is used with increasing regularity to diagnose and treat myriad upper urinary tract pathologies. Advances and miniaturization in the design of ureteroscopes and their accessory instruments combined with sound ureteroscopic technique make modern ureteroscopy quite safe. However, complications of ureteroscopy still do occur and can result in severe ureteral injury and possible kidney loss. There exists no standardized classification system to report complications of ureteroscopy and so determining exact incidences of these complications is difficult.

The vast majority of complications is minor and usually requires little more than ureteral stenting and time. Major ureteroscopic misadventures are considered those that are life threatening or require further open or laparoscopic surgical repair. Overall major complications of ureteroscopy happen infrequently and the incidence appears to be decreasing. Major ureteral injuries are usually recognized during ureteroscopy and allow for prompt management. The preferred approach to the repair of major ureteral injuries depends on the nature of the injury and its length and location.

Proper technique and familiarity with the various ureteroscopes and accessories is important to minimizing the complications of ureteroscopy. A thorough understanding of the different possible complications and predisposing risk factors can help to anticipate and avoid these complications. Appropriate and timely management of complications when they do arise is a crucial step to safe and successful ureteroscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Young HH, McKay RW. Congenital valvular obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1929;48:509–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grasso M. Complications of ureteropyeloscopy. In: Taneja SS, Smith RB, Ehrlich RM, editors. Complications of urologic surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 268–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stoller ML, Wolf JS. Ensoscopic ureteral injuries. In: McAninch JW, editor. Traumatic and reconstructive urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996. p. 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Niţa G, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol. 2006;20(3):179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krambeck AE, Murat FJ, Gettman MT, Chow GK, Patterson DE, Segura JW. The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(4):468–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rioja J, Mamoulakis C, Sodha H, Suwijn S, Laguna P, de la Rosette J. A Plea for centralized care for ureteroscopy: results from a comparative study under different conditions within the same center. J Endourol. 2011;25(3):425–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol. 2001;166(2):538–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cetti RJ, Biers S, Keoghane SR. The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):31–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flam TA, Malone JM, Roth RA. Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am. 1988;15(2):167–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel-Razzak OM, Bagley DH. Clinical experience with flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1788–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blute ML, Segura JW, Patterson DE. Ureteroscopy. J Urol. 1988;139(3):510–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of ureteral and intrarenal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(4):623–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiplitsky SI, Milhoua PM, Patel MB, Minsky L, Hoenig DM. Case report: intrarenal arteriovenous fistula after ureteroscopic stone extraction with holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2007;21(5):530–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Cook AJ, Beiko DT, Nott L, Auge BK, Preminger GM, Denstedt JD. Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol. 2002;168(2):442–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA, Nott L, Razvi H, Denstedt JD. Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol. 2002;167(1):31–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Başar H, Ohta N, Kageyama S, Suzuki K, Kawabe K. Treatment of ureteral and renal stones by electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 1997;29(3):275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Teichman JM, Rao RD, Rogenes VJ, Harris JM. Ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi: electrohydraulic versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 1997;158(4):1357–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson DB, Pearle MS. Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(1):157–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de la Rosette JJ, Skrekas T, Segura JW. Handling and prevention of complications in stone basketing. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):991–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M. Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62(2):218–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, Holden T, Turk TM, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, Hinck B, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Monga M. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology. 2010;75(3):534–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Techniques to maximize flexible ureterscope longevity. Urology. 2002;60(5):784–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, L’Esperance JO, Tan YH, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology. 2005;66(5):958–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR. Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):903–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Francesca F, Scattoni V, Nava L, Pompa P, Grasso M, Rigatti P. Failures and complications of transurethral ureteroscopy in 297 cases: conventional rigid instruments vs. small caliber semirigid ureteroscopes. Eur Urol. 1995;28(2):112–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lytton B, Weiss RM, Green DF. Complications of ureteral endoscopy. J Urol. 1987;137(4):649–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinberg JJ, Ansong K, Smith AD. Complications of ureteroscopy in relation to experience: report of survey and author experience. J Urol. 1987;137(3):384–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Evans CP, Stoller ML. The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone. J Urol. 1993;150(3):827–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol. 1997;157(1):28–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Butler MR, Power RE, Thornhill JA, Ahmad I, McLornan I, McDermott T, Grainger R. An audit of 2273 ureteroscopies–a focus on intra-operative complications to justify proactive management of ureteric calculi. Surgeon. 2004;2(1):42–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jeromin L, Sosnowski M. Ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral stones: over 10 years’ experience. Eur Urol. 1998;34(4):344–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernhard PH, Reddy PK. Retrograde ureteral intussusception: a rare complication. J Endourol. 1996;10(4):349–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Park J, Siegel C, Moll M, Konnak J. Retrograde ureteral intussusception. J Urol. 1994;151(4):997–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Compton JS, Drummond M. Intussusception of the ureter by a polypoid transitional cell carcinoma. Br J Urol. 1986;58(6):725–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazer MJ, Lacy SS, Kao L. “Bell-shaped ureter”, a radiographic sign of antegrade intussusception. Urol Radiol. 1979;1(1):63–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu W, Yu CS, Yang L, Li KC. Ureteral intussusception due to a polyp. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32(5):675–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alapont JM, Broseta E, Oliver F, Pontones JL, Boronat F, Jiménez-Cruz JF. Ureteral avulsion as a complication of ureteroscopy. Int Braz J Urol. 2003;29(1):18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ordon M, Schuler TD, Honey RJ. Ureteral avulsion during contemporary ureteroscopic stone management: “the scabbard avulsion”. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1259–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stoller ML, Wolf Jr JS, Hofmann R, Marc B. Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. Urol. 1992;147(5):1238–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tanriverdi O, Yencilek F, Koyuncu H, Yencilek E, Sarica K. Emergent stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: evaluation of 23 patients. Urology. 2011;77(2):305–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pengfei S, Yutao L, Jie Y, Wuran W, Yi D, Hao Z, Jia W. The results of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1904–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J, McClinton S. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: ­systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;334(7593):572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Richter S, Shalev M, Lobik L, Buchumensky V, Nissenkorn I. Early postureteroscopy vesicoureteral reflux–a temporary and infrequent complication: prospective study. J Endourol. 1999;13(5):365–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Netto Jr NR, de Almeida Claro J, Esteves SC, Amdrade EFM. Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why Change? J Urol. 1997;157(6):2081–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Puppo P, Ricciotti G, Bozzo W, Introini C. Primary endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi. A review of 378 cases. Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):48–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Coptcoat MJ, Webb DR, Kellet MJ, Whitfield HN, Wickham JE. The steinstrasse: a legacy of extracorporeal lithotripsy? Eur Urol. 1988;14(2):93–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fedullo LM, Pollack HM, Banner MP, Amendola MA, Van Arsdalen KN. The development of steinstrassen after ESWL: frequency, natural history, and radiologic management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(6):1145–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E, Eraky I, Kenawy M. Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1239–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Al-Awadi KA, Abdul Halim H, Kehinde EO, Al-Tawheed A. Steinstrasse: a comparison of incidence with and without J stenting and the effect of J stenting on subsequent management. BJU Int. 1999;84(6):618–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sulaiman MN, Buchholz NP, Clark PB. The role of ureteral stent placement in the prevention of steinstrasse. J Endourol. 1999;13(3):151–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim SC, Oh CH, Moon YT, Kim KD. Treatment of steinstrasse with repeat extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: experience with piezoelectric lithotriptor. J Urol. 1991;145(3):489–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Beck SM, Finley DS, Deane LA. fungal urosepsis after ureteroscopy in cirrhotic patients: a word of caution. Urology. 2008;72(2):291–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wolf Jr JS, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ. Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Manger JP, Mendoza PJ, Babayan RK, Wang DS. Use of renal ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis after ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1399–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Adiyat KT, Meuleners R, Monga M. Selective postoperative imaging after ureteroscopy. Urology. 2009;73(3):490–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Weizer AZ, Auge BK, Silverstein AD, Delvecchio FC, Brizuela RM, Dahm P, Pietrow PK, Lewis BR, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Urol. 2002;168(1):46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bugg Jr CE, El-Galley R, Kenney PJ, Burns JR. Follow-up functional radiographic studies are not mandatory for all patients after ureteroscopy. Urology. 2002;59(5):662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Roberts WW, Cadeddu JA, Micali S, Kavoussi LR, Moore RG. Ureteral stricture formation after removal of impacted calculi. J Urol. 1998;159(3):723–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dretler SP, Young RH. Stone granuloma: a cause of ureteral stricture. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1800–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Elliott DS, Segura JW, Lightner D, Patterson DE, Blute ML. Is nephroureterectomy necessary in all cases of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma? Long-term results of conservative endourologic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in individuals with a normal contralateral kidney. Urology. 2001;58(2):174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Martinez-Pineiro JA, Garcia Matres MJ, Martinez-Pineiro L. Endourological treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: analysis of a series of 59 tumors. J Urol. 1996;156(2 Pt 1):377–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Elliott DS, Blute ML, Patterson DE, Bergstralh EJ, Segura JW. Long-term follow-up of endoscopically treated upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology. 1996;47(6):819–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen GL, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients with normal contralateral kidneys. J Urol. 2000;164(4):1173–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Keeley Jr FX, Bibbo M, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic treatment and surveillance of upper urinary tract ­transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1997;157(5):1560–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, Weizer AZ, Silverstein AD, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology. 2003;61(3):518–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ayyathurai R, Kanagarajah P, Shields J, Young E, Alvarez A, Bird VG. Single-center clinical comparison of two reinforced ureteral access sheaths for retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of urinary lithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(2):409–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic. Urol Clin North Am. 2006;33(1):55–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Perez-Brayfield MR, Keane TE, Krishnan A, Lafontaine P, Feliciano DV, Clarke HS. Gunshot wounds to the ureter: a 40-year experience at Grady Memorial Hospital. J Urol. 2001;166(1):119–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ghali AM, El Malik EM, Ibrahim AI, Ismail G, Rashid M. Ureteric injuries: diagnosis, management, and outcome. J Trauma. 1999;46(1):150–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, MMC 394 Mayo, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    David A. Leavitt M.D., J. Kyle Anderson M.D. & Sean P. Elliott M.D.

Authors
  1. David A. Leavitt M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Kyle Anderson M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sean P. Elliott M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kyle Anderson M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, The Cleveland Clinic, 2842 Fontenay Road, Cleveland, 44120, Ohio, USA

    Manoj Monga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leavitt, D.A., Anderson, J.K., Elliott, S.P. (2013). Complications of Ureteroscopy. In: Monga, M. (eds) Ureteroscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-205-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-206-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation