Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Embryonic Stem Cells: A Signalling Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mitochondrial DNA, Mitochondria, Disease and Stem Cells

Part of the book series: Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine ((STEMCELL))

Abstract

Since their discovery more than 30 years ago, embryonic stem (ES) cells have been propelled from relative obscurity into the centre stage of international attention. They have enabled the study of gene function in animal models, provided a platform for the study of early developmental processes and now their enormous promise for the study and treatment of many diseases is being tested, although to date very few clinical studies have been initiated to translate this promise into therapeutic outcome. Here, I review the progress made in understanding how signals from the environment influence pluripotent cell self-renewal and differentiation and discuss some of the differences encountered between pluripotent cells from various species and distinct developmental origins. The interaction between these signal transduction pathways is of critical importance, as it ultimately orchestrates the behaviour of ES cells by controlling the expression of pluripotency determinants as well as lineage effectors. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) generated by reprogramming of somatic cells are also discussed and related to the pluripotent cell states which can be captured during normal embryonic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amit M, Shariki C, Margulets V, Itskovitz-Eldor J (2004) Feeder layer- and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod 70:837–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubert J, Dunstan H, Chambers I, Smith A (2002) Functional gene screening in embryonic stem cells implicates Wnt antagonism in neural differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 20:1240–1245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao S, Tang F, Li X, Hayashi K, Gillich A, Lao K, Surani MA (2009) Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Nature 461:1292–1295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley A, Evans MJ, Kaufman MH, Robertson E (1984) Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 309:255–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Rugg-Gunn P, Sun B, Chuva De Sousa Lopes SM, Howlett SK, Clarkson A, Ahrlund-Richter L, Pedersen RA, Vallier L (2007) Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448:191–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brook FA, Gardner RL (1997) The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. PNAS 94:5709–5712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buecker C, Chen HH, Polo JM, Daheron L, Bu L, Barakat TS, Okwieka P, Porter A, Gribnau J, Hochedlinger K, Geijsen N (2010) A murine ESC-like state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6:535–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buehr M, Meek S, Blair K, Yang J, Ure J, Silva J, McLay R, Hall J, Ying QL, Smith A (2008) Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell 135:1287–1298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burdon T, Stracey C, Chambers I, Nichols J, Smith A (1999) Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 210:30–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1996) Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cartwright P, McLean C, Sheppard A, Rivett D, Jones K, Dalton S (2005) LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism. Development 132:885–896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, Robertson M, Vrana J, Jones K, Grotewold L, Smith A (2007) Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450:1230–1234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen G, Hou Z, Gulbranson DR, Thomson JA (2010) Actin-myosin contractility is responsible for the reduced viability of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:240–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Covello KL, Kehler J, Yu H, Gordan JD, Arsham AM, Hu CJ, Labosky PA, Simon MC, Keith B (2006) HIF-2alpha regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev 20:557–570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cross DA, Alessi DR, Cohen P, Andjelkovich M, Hemmings BA (1995) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B. Nature 378:785–789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans MJ, Kaufman M (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM (2005) Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4783–4788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frame S, Cohen P (2001) GSK3 takes centre stage more than 20 years after its discovery. Biochem J 359:1–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginis I, Luo Y, Miura T, Thies S, Brandenberger R, Gerecht-Nir S, Amit M, Hoke A, Carpenter MK, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rao MS (2004) Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 269:360–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo G, Yang J, Nichols J, Hall JS, Eyres I, Mansfield W, Smith A (2009) Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136:1063–1069

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurdon JB (1962) The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol 10:622–640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall J, Guo G, Wray J, Eyres I, Nichols J, Grotewold L, Morfopoulou S, Humphreys P, Mansfield W, Walker R, Tomlinson S, Smith A (2009) Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Kruppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 5:597–609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Han DW, Tapia N, Joo JY, Greber B, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Bernemann C, Ko K, Wu G, Stehling M, Do JT, Scholer HR (2010) Epiblast stem cell subpopulations represent mouse embryos of distinct pregastrulation stages. Cell 143:617–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanna J, Cheng AW, Saha K, Kim J, Lengner CJ, Soldner F, Cassady JP, Muffat J, Carey BW, Jaenisch R (2010) Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9222–9227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Mitalipova M, Cheng AW, Cassady JP, Staerk J, Carey BW, Lengner CJ, Foreman R, Love J, Gao Q, Kim J, Jaenisch R (2009) Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 4:513–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansis C, Barreto G, Maltry N, Niehrs C (2004) Nuclear reprogramming of human somatic cells by xenopus egg extract requires BRG1. Curr Biol 14:1475–1480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayashi K, Lopes SM, Tang F, Surani MA (2008) Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 3:391–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Henriksson M, Bakardjiev A, Klein G, Luscher B (1993) Phosphorylation sites mapping in the N-terminal domain of c-myc modulate its transforming potential. Oncogene 8:3199–3209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hyman AH, Simons K (2011) The new cell biology: beyond HeLa cells. Nature 480:34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Iyer NV, Kotch LE, Agani F, Leung SW, Laughner E, Wenger RH, Gassmann M, Gearhart JD, Lawler AM, Yu AY, Semenza GL (1998) Cellular and developmental control of O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Genes Dev 12:149–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaeger I, Arber C, Risner-Janiczek JR, Kuechler J, Pritzsche D, Chen IC, Naveenan T, Ungless MA, Li M (2011) Temporally controlled modulation of FGF/ERK signaling directs midbrain dopaminergic neural progenitor fate in mouse and human pluripotent stem cells. Development 138:4363–4374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson CE, Crawford BE, Stavridis M, ten Dam G, Wat AL, Rushton G, Ward CM, Wilson V, van Kuppevelt TH, Esko JD, Smith A, Gallagher JT, Merry CL (2007) Essential alterations of heparan sulfate during the differentiation of embryonic stem cells to Sox1-EGFP expressing neural progenitor cells. Stem Cells 25(8):1913–1923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalmar T, Lim C, Hayward P, Munoz-Descalzo S, Nichols J, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Martinez Arias A (2009) Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7:e1000149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim D, Kim CH, Moon JI, Chung YG, Chang MY, Han BS, Ko S, Yang E, Cha KY, Lanza R, Kim KS (2009) Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4:472–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kunath T, Saba-El-leil MK, Almousailleakh M, Wray J, Meloche S, Smith A (2007) FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment. Development 134:2895–2902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lanner F, Rossant J (2010) The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development 137:3351–3360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ledermann B, Burki K (1991) Establishment of a germ-line competent C57BL/6 embryonic stem cell line. Exp Cell Res 197:254–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leese HJ (2002) Quiet please, do not disturb: a hypothesis of embryo metabolism and viability. BioEssays 24:845–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lengner CJ, Gimelbrant AA, Erwin JA, Cheng AW, Guenther MG, Welstead GG, Alagappan R, Frampton GM, Xu P, Muffat J, Santagata S, Powers D, Barrett CB, Young RA, Lee JT, Jaenisch R, Mitalipova M (2010) Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 141:872–883

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li M, Sendtner M, Smith A (1995) Essential function of LIF receptor in motor neurons. Nature 378:724–727

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li P, Tong C, Mehrian-Shai R, Jia L, Wu N, Yan Y, Maxson RE, Schulze EN, Song H, Hsieh CL, Pera MF, Ying QL (2008) Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts. Cell 135:1299–1310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lowell S, Benchoua A, Heavey B, Smith AG (2006) Notch promotes neural lineage entry by pluripotent embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 4:e121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lyashenko N, Winter M, Migliorini D, Biechele T, Moon RT, Hartmann C (2011) Differential requirement for the dual functions of beta-catenin in embryonic stem cell self-renewal and germ layer formation. Nat Cell Biol 13:753–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin GR (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:7634–7638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Matsuda T, Nakamura T, Nakao K, Arai T, Katsuki M, Heike T, Yokota T (1999) STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO J 18:4261–4269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mazumdar J, O’Brien WT, Johnson RS, Lamanna JC, Chavez JC, Klein PS, Simon MC (2010) O2 regulates stem cells through Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nat Cell Biol 12:1007–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mead RA (1993) Embryonic diapause in vertebrates. J Exp Zool 266:629–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Morey C, Avner P (2011) The demoiselle of X-inactivation: 50 years old and as trendy and mesmerising as ever. PLoS Genet 7:e1002212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Murphy LO, Smith S, Chen RH, Fingar DC, Blenis J (2002) Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products. Nat Cell Biol 4:556–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder JC (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:8424–8428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nichols J, Chambers I, Taga T, Smith A (2001) Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines. Development 128:2333–2339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nichols J, Jones K, Phillips JM, Newland SA, Roode M, Mansfield W, Smith A, Cooke A (2009) Validated germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from nonobese diabetic mice. Nat Med 15:814–818

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Nichols J, Smith A (2009) Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4:487–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Niwa H, Burdon T, Chambers I, Smith A (1998) Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. Genes Dev 12:2048–2060

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ogawa K, Nishinakamura R, Iwamatsu Y, Shimosato D, Niwa H (2006) Synergistic action of Wnt and LIF in maintaining pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 343:159–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ohgushi M, Matsumura M, Eiraku M, Murakami K, Aramaki T, Nishiyama A, Muguruma K, Nakano T, Suga H, Ueno M, Ishizaki T, Suemori H, Narumiya S, Niwa H, Sasai Y (2010) Molecular pathway and cell state responsible for dissociation-induced apoptosis in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:225–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448:313–317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Okita K, Yamanaka S (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cells: opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:2198–2207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Oliver Brüstle vs. Greenpeace e.V. (2011) European Court of Justice (grand chamber). Official J Court 362:5

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pickford CE, Holley RJ, Rushton G, Stavridis MP, Ward CM, Merry CL (2011) Specific glycosaminoglycans modulate neural specification of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 29:629–640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rathjen J, Lake JA, Bettess MD, Washington JM, Chapman G, Rathjen PD (1999) Formation of a primitive ectoderm like cell population, EPL cells, from ES cells in response to biologically derived factors. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 5):601–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Rathjen J, Washington JM, Bettess MD, Rathjen PD (2003) Identification of a biological activity that supports maintenance and proliferation of pluripotent cells from the primitive ectoderm of the mouse. Biol Reprod 69:1863–1871

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Robertson EJ (1987) Teratocarcinoma and embryo-derived stem cells: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH (2004) Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med 10:55–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Smith AG (2001) Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17:435–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Smith AG, Heath JK, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J, Stahl M, Rogers D (1988) Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336:688–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Stavridis MP, Collins BJ, Storey KG (2010) Retinoic acid orchestrates fibroblast growth factor signalling to drive embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development 137:881–890

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Stavridis MP, Lunn JS, Collins BJ, Storey KG (2007) A discrete period of FGF-induced Erk1/2 signalling is required for vertebrate neural specification. Development 134:2889–2894

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Stavridis MP, Smith AG (2003) Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Biochem Soc Trans 31:45–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Stewart CL, Kaspar P, Brunet LJ, Bhatt H, Gadi I, Kontgen F, Abbondanzo SJ (1992) Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature 359:76–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Storm MP, Bone HK, Beck CG, Bourillot PY, Schreiber V, Damiano T, Nelson A, Savatier P, Welham MJ (2007) Regulation of nanog expression by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling in murine embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 282:6265–6273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Suda Y, Suzuki M, Ikawa Y, Aizawa S (1987) Mouse embryonic stem cells exhibit indefinite proliferative potential. J Cell Physiol 133:197–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Tachibana M, Sparman M, Ramsey C, Ma H, Lee H-S, Penedo MCT, Mitalipov S (2012) Generation of chimeric rhesus monkeys. Cell 148(1–2):285–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Tada S, Era T, Furusawa C, Sakurai H, Nishikawa S, Kinoshita M, Nakao K, Chiba T, Nishikawa S (2005) Characterization of mesendoderm: a diverging point of the definitive endoderm and mesoderm in embryonic stem cell differentiation culture. Development 132:4363–4374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–872

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ten Berge D, Kurek D, Blauwkamp T, Koole W, Maas A, Eroglu E, Siu RK, Nusse R (2011) Embryonic stem cells require Wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 13:1070–1075

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Terada N, Hamazaki T, Oka M, Hoki M, Mastalerz DM, Nakano Y, Meyer EM, Morel L, Petersen BE, Scott EW (2002) Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature 416:542–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP, Mack DL, Gardner RL, McKay RD (2007) New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448:196–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Thomas KR, Capecchi MR (1987) Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51:503–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145–1147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, Durning M, Harris CP, Becker RA, Hearn JP (1995) Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. PNAS 92:7844–7848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Murakami K, Takahashi K, Niwa H (2008) Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135:909–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Vallier L, Alexander M, Pedersen RA (2005) Activin/nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 118:4495–4509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Vallier L, Mendjan S, Brown S, Chng Z, Teo A, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Cho CH, Martinez A, Rugg-Gunn P, Brons G, Pedersen RA (2009) Activin/nodal signalling maintains pluripotency by controlling nanog expression. Development 136:1339–1349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Varlakhanova NV, Cotterman RF, Devries WN, Morgan J, Donahue LR, Murray S, Knowles BB, Knoepfler PS (2010) MYC maintains embryonic stem cell pluripotency and self-renewal. Differentiation 80:9–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Vervoorts J, Luscher-Firzlaff J, Luscher B (2006) The ins and outs of MYC regulation by posttranslational mechanisms. J Biol Chem 281:34725–34729

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP, Kokubu Y, Sudhof TC, Wernig M (2010) Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463:1035–1041

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Ware CB, Horowitz MC, Renshaw BR, Hunt JS, Liggitt D, Koblar SA, Gliniak BC, McKenna HJ, Papayannopoulou T, Thoma B et al (1995) Targeted disruption of the low-affinity leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene causes placental, skeletal, neural and metabolic defects and results in perinatal death. Development 121:1283–1299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Warren L, Manos PD, Ahfeldt T, Loh YH, Li H, Lau F, Ebina W, Mandal PK, Smith ZD, Meissner A, Daley GQ, Brack AS, Collins JJ, Cowan C, Schlaeger TM, Rossi DJ (2010) Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell 7:618–630

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, Wataya T, Takahashi JB, Nishikawa S, Nishikawa S, Muguruma K, Sasai Y (2007) A rock inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 25:681–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Weinhold B, Schratt G, Arsenian S, Berger J, Kamino K, Schwarz H, Ruther U, Nordheim A (2000) Srf(-/-) ES cells display non-cell-autonomous impairment in mesodermal differentiation. EMBO J 19:5835–5844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Whitten WK (1971) Nutrient requirements for the culture of preimplantation embryos in vitro. In: Raspe G (ed) Advances in the biosciences. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  94. Williams RL, Hilton DJ, Pease S, Willson TA, Stewart CL, Gearing DP, Wagner EF, Metcalf D, Nicola NA, Gough NM (1988) Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336:684–687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Wray J, Kalkan T, Gomez-Lopez S, Eckardt D, Cook A, Kemler R, Smith A (2011) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation. Nat Cell Biol 13:838–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Yi F, Pereira L, Hoffman JA, Shy BR, Yuen CM, Liu DR, Merrill BJ (2011) Opposing effects of Tcf3 and Tcf1 control Wnt stimulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol 13:762–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A (2003) BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115:281–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Ying QL, Nichols J, Evans EP, Smith AG (2002) Changing potency by spontaneous fusion. Nature 416:545–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Ying QL, Stavridis M, Griffiths D, Li M, Smith A (2003) Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol 21:183–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Yoshida K, Taga T, Saito M, Suematsu S, Kumanogoh A, Tanaka T, Fujiwara H, Hirata M, Yamagami T, Nakahata T, Hirabayashi T, Yoneda Y, Tanaka K, Wang WZ, Mori C, Shiota K, Yoshida N, Kishimoto T (1996) Targeted disruption of gp130, a common signal transducer for the interleukin 6 family of cytokines, leads to myocardial and hematological disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:407–411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, SLUKVIN II, Thomson JA (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318:1917–1920

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Zwaka TP, Thomson JA (2003) Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 21:319–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cancer Biology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK

    Marios P. Stavridis

Authors
  1. Marios P. Stavridis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marios P. Stavridis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Center for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Wright Street 27-31, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia

    Justin C. St. John

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stavridis, M.P. (2013). Embryonic Stem Cells: A Signalling Perspective. In: St. John, J. (eds) Mitochondrial DNA, Mitochondria, Disease and Stem Cells. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-101-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation