Skip to main content

Fundamental Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1599 Accesses

Abstract

From the time of Hippocrates, doctors have undertaken to practice medicine in accordance with ethical and professional codes of conduct. In addition, as with any other citizen, they are required to comply with the laws of the country in which they reside and practice and must understand the constraints and obligations these may impose on them. Laws will vary from one jurisdiction to another, although there may be some commonality, for example, secondary legislation deriving from European Union law and the influence of English common law on countries of the old Commonwealth. This chapter is written from the perspective of the law in England and Wales and should be read with that in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993) AC789, 857 per Lord Keith of Kinkel

    Google Scholar 

  2. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together General Medical Council, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S (No 2): R v Louise Collins & Ors Ex parte S (No 2) (1998) (Guidelines issued by the Court of Appeal as to steps to be taken when patient refuses consent to necessary treatment)

    Google Scholar 

  4. In re C (1994) 1WLR 290

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals (1985) AC 871; [1985] 1 AllER 643

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] AMLD 6993; 16 BMLR, 148 (Australian High Court)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canterbury v Spence (1972) 464 F2d 772 (US App DC)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reibl v Hughes 114 DLR 3d 1 (Canadian Supreme Court 1980); (1980) 2 SCR 880

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority (1998) AC 232; [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. Med. 26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chester v Afshar (2004) UKHL 41

    Google Scholar 

  11. In re F (1990) 2.AC 1

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 AllER 118; [1957] 1 WLR 582

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1984) AC 112

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guidelines for doctors asked to perform intimate body searches, British Medical Association and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. General Medical Council. Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. General Medical Council, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. British Medical Association. Taking and using video and audio images of patients. British Medical Association, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guidance for best practice for the management of intimate images that may become evidence in court, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Extract from the Hippocratic Oath. 5th century BC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Confidentiality, General Medical Council, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Association of Police Surgeons and British Medical Association. Revised interim guidelines on confidentiality for police surgeons in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Association of Police Surgeons (now the Association of Forensic Physicians), East Kilbride. British Medical Association, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California (1976) P 551 2d 334 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  22. W v Egdell (1990) Ch. 359; [1990] 1 All ER 835

    Google Scholar 

  23. Confidentiality: reporting gunshot and knife wounds, General Medical Council, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Good Medical Practice, General Medical Council, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. (“The Ikarian Reefer”); (The Times, March 5, 1993); (1993) 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 68 (High Court 1993); [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 455 (CA 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Academy of Experts and Expert Witness Institute joint Code of Practice. Endorsed by Master of Rolls 22 June (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. General Medical Council Acting as an Expert Witness – guidance for doctors, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Whitehouse v Jordan (1981) 1WLR 246, 256 per Lord Wilberforce

    Google Scholar 

  29. Polivitte Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co. (1987) plc 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 379, 386 per Garland J

    Google Scholar 

  30. Derby & Co. Ltd. and Others v Weldon and Others (No. 9) The Times, November 9, (1990) per Staughton LJ

    Google Scholar 

  31. Expert Witness Institute (2011). http://www.Ewi.org.uk. Accessed 20 June 2011

  32. Civil Procedure Rules. The Stationery Office, London (1999); and on the Department of Constitu­tional Affairs (formerly Lord Chancellor’s Department). Available at Website: http://www.dca.gov/uk

  33. Re N (1999) Lloyds Law Reports (Medical) 257; [1999] EWCA Civ 1452

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. George M. Fernie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Page, J., Fernie, C.G.M. (2011). Fundamental Principles. In: Stark, M. (eds) Clinical Forensic Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-258-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics