Abstract
From the time of Hippocrates, doctors have undertaken to practice medicine in accordance with ethical and professional codes of conduct. In addition, as with any other citizen, they are required to comply with the laws of the country in which they reside and practice and must understand the constraints and obligations these may impose on them. Laws will vary from one jurisdiction to another, although there may be some commonality, for example, secondary legislation deriving from European Union law and the influence of English common law on countries of the old Commonwealth. This chapter is written from the perspective of the law in England and Wales and should be read with that in mind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993) AC789, 857 per Lord Keith of Kinkel
Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together General Medical Council, London (2008)
St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S (No 2): R v Louise Collins & Ors Ex parte S (No 2) (1998) (Guidelines issued by the Court of Appeal as to steps to be taken when patient refuses consent to necessary treatment)
In re C (1994) 1WLR 290
Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals (1985) AC 871; [1985] 1 AllER 643
Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] AMLD 6993; 16 BMLR, 148 (Australian High Court)
Canterbury v Spence (1972) 464 F2d 772 (US App DC)
Reibl v Hughes 114 DLR 3d 1 (Canadian Supreme Court 1980); (1980) 2 SCR 880
Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority (1998) AC 232; [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. Med. 26
Chester v Afshar (2004) UKHL 41
In re F (1990) 2.AC 1
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 AllER 118; [1957] 1 WLR 582
Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1984) AC 112
Guidelines for doctors asked to perform intimate body searches, British Medical Association and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, London (2010)
General Medical Council. Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. General Medical Council, London (2002)
British Medical Association. Taking and using video and audio images of patients. British Medical Association, London (2009)
Guidance for best practice for the management of intimate images that may become evidence in court, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London (2010)
Extract from the Hippocratic Oath. 5th century BC
Confidentiality, General Medical Council, London (2009)
Association of Police Surgeons and British Medical Association. Revised interim guidelines on confidentiality for police surgeons in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Association of Police Surgeons (now the Association of Forensic Physicians), East Kilbride. British Medical Association, London (1998)
Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California (1976) P 551 2d 334 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 1976)
W v Egdell (1990) Ch. 359; [1990] 1 All ER 835
Confidentiality: reporting gunshot and knife wounds, General Medical Council, London (2009)
Good Medical Practice, General Medical Council, London (2006)
National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. (“The Ikarian Reefer”); (The Times, March 5, 1993); (1993) 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 68 (High Court 1993); [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 455 (CA 1995)
Academy of Experts and Expert Witness Institute joint Code of Practice. Endorsed by Master of Rolls 22 June (2005)
General Medical Council Acting as an Expert Witness – guidance for doctors, UK (2009)
Whitehouse v Jordan (1981) 1WLR 246, 256 per Lord Wilberforce
Polivitte Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co. (1987) plc 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 379, 386 per Garland J
Derby & Co. Ltd. and Others v Weldon and Others (No. 9) The Times, November 9, (1990) per Staughton LJ
Expert Witness Institute (2011). http://www.Ewi.org.uk. Accessed 20 June 2011
Civil Procedure Rules. The Stationery Office, London (1999); and on the Department of Constitutional Affairs (formerly Lord Chancellor’s Department). Available at Website: http://www.dca.gov/uk
Re N (1999) Lloyds Law Reports (Medical) 257; [1999] EWCA Civ 1452
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Page, J., Fernie, C.G.M. (2011). Fundamental Principles. In: Stark, M. (eds) Clinical Forensic Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-258-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-258-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-257-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-258-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)