Skip to main content
  • 3996 Accesses

Abstract

Since the advent of the microprocessor, affordable storage devices, and networks, more of our daily lives are being recorded in the ones and zeros of the digital world. Thus, it is not surprising that when crimes and torts are committed, there is often evidence of probative value stored or transmitted in digital form. This, in fact, is the definition of digital evidence according to the Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE) (Forensic Science Communications 2(2), 2000). This digital evidence can be probative in virtually any criminal or civil matter. As a result of this, it appears that digital evidence will likely become the predominant form of evidence in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence. Digital Evidence: Standards and Principles. Forensic Science Communications 2(2), (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moore, G. Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits. Electronics 38(8), 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. http://.sims.berkley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/

  4. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

  5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0

  6. Electronic Crime Scene Investigation, NIJ Publication, Washington, DC, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Best Practices for Seizing Electronic Evidence Version 2.0, United States Secret Service.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement. NIJ Publication Washington, DC, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pollitt, M. (2008). Applying Traditional Forensic Taxonomy to Digital Forensics. In Advances in Digital Forensics IV, Springer, Newyork, NY, (pp. 17–26).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.ascld-lab.org/dual/aslabdualhistory.html

  12. http://www.guidancesoftware.com

  13. http://www.sleuthkit.org/

  14. http://www.accessdata.com

  15. http://www.wireshark.org/

  16. http://www.wildpackets.com

  17. http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress00/kerr090600.htm

  18. http://www.nsrl.nist.gov/

  19. Chalk, R., Frankel, M.S., and Chafer, S.B. AAAS Professional Ethics Project. American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS Publication, Washington, DC, 80-R-4. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Pollitt MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollitt, M., Bianchi, R. (2011). Digital Evidence. In: Mozayani, A., Noziglia, C. (eds) The Forensic Laboratory Handbook Procedures and Practice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-872-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics