Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attachment Theory and Research: Implications for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Psychiatry ((CCPSY))

Abstract

Though attachment research today is best conceptualized as integrationist and multidisciplinary, it is important to remember that attachment theory was born out of clinical process. Bowlby [1–3] was first and foremost a psychoanalyst, and he drew from clinical experiences with children and adults to conceptualize his theory. Many of his ideas developed in response to dissatisfaction with the prevailing perspectives of the time. Though Melanie Klein, his supervisor at the time, was quite influential in his thinking about object relations, her conceptualization of development focused almost exclusively on internal conflict rather than external events in the child’s family and environment [4, 5]. Contrary to Klein’s perspective, during the analysis of a 3-year-old boy, Bowlby observed direct links between disturbances in the mother and pathology in the child. Such experiences in analytic treatment formed the basis for his assertion that early attachment difficulties increase ­vulnerability to later psychopathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Separation: anxiety and anger, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowlby J. The making and breaking of affectional bonds: I. Aetiology and psychopathology in light of attachment theory. Br J Psychiatry. 1977;130:201–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Attachment, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bretherton I. Attachment theory: retrospect and prospect. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50:3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bretherton I. The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Dev Psychol. 1992; 28:759–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ainsworth MS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson RJ, Moran G. Attachment theory, personality development, and psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:611–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van IJzendoorn MH. Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment – a meta analysis of the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:387–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters E, Merrick S, Treboux D, Crowell J, Albersheim L. Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: a twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Dev. 2000;71:684–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton CE. Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Dev. 2000; 71:690–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinfield NS, Sroufe LA, Egeland B. Attachment from infancy to young adulthood in a high-risk sample: continuity, discontinuity and their correlates. Child Dev. 2000;71(3):695–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis M, Feiring C, Rosenthal S. Attachment over time. Child Dev. 2000;71:707–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraley RC. Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6:123–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Waters E. Attachment from infancy to adulthood: the major longitudinal studies. New York: Guilford; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Main M, Weston DR. The quality of the toddler’s relationship to mother and to father: related to conflict behavior and the readiness to establish new relationships. Child Dev. 1981;52:932–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Main M, Hesse E. Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: is frightened or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In: Greenberg MT, Cicchetti D, Cummings EM, editors. Attachment in the preschool years: theory, research, and intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990. p. 161–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J. Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50:66–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Obegi JH, Berant E. Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults. New York: Guilford; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. George C, Kaplan N, Main M. The berkeley adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript. Berkeley: Department of Psychology, University of California; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52: 511–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaver P, Hazan C, Bradshaw D. Love as attachment. In: Sternberg RJ, Barnes ML, editors. The psychology of love. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1988. p. 68–99.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bartholomew K. Avoidance of intimacy: an attachment perspective. J Soc Pers Relat. 1990;7:147–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartholomew K. Assessment of individual differences in adult attachment. Psychol Inq. 1994;5:23–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:226–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartholomew K, Shaver PR. Methods of assessing adult attachment: do they converge? In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS, editors. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Crowell JA, Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR, editors. Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 434–65.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shaver PR, Belsky J, Brennan KA. The adult attachment interview and self-reports of romantic attachment: associations across domains and methods. Pers Relationship. 2000;7:25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korfmacher J, Adam E, Ogawa J, Egeland B. Adult attachment: implications for the therapeutic process in a home visitation intervention. Appl Dev Sci. 1997;1:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anisfeld E, Casper V, Nozyce M, Cunningham N. Does infant carrying promote attachment? An experimental study on the effects of increased physical contact on the development of attachment. Child Dev. 1990;61: 1617–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cicchetti D, Toth SL, Rogosch FA. The efficacy of toddler-parent psychotherapy to increase attachment security in offspring of depressed mothers. Attach Hum Dev. 1999;1:34–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Toth SL, Rogosch FA, Manly JT, Cicchetti D. The efficacy of toddler-parent psychotherapy to reorganize attachment in the young offspring of mothers with major depressive disorder: a randomized preventive trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(6):1006–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lieberman AF, Van Horn P, Ippen CG. Toward evidence-based treatment: child–parent psychotherapy with preschoolers exposed to marital violence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44:1241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lieberman AF, Ippen C, Van Horn P. Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:913–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heinicke CM, Goorsky M, Levine M, Ponce V, Ruth G, Silverman M, et al. Pre and postnatal antecedents of a home visiting intervention and family developmental outcome. Inf Mental Health J. 2006;27:91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van den Boom DC. The influence of temperament and mothering on attachment and exploration: an experimental manipulation of sensitive responsiveness among lower-class mothers with irritable infants. Child Dev. 1994;65:1457–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen NJ, Muir E, Lojkasik M, Parker CJ, Barwick M, Brown M. Watch, wait, and wonder: testing the effectiveness of a new approach to mother–infant psychotherapy. Inf Mental Health J. 1999;20:429–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marvin R, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Powell B. The circle of security project: attachment-based intervention with caregiver-preschool child dyads. Attach Hum Dev. 2002;1:107–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoffman K, Marvin R, Cooper G, Powell B. Changing toddlers’ and preschoolers’ attachment classifications: the circle of security intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1017–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klerman G, Weissman MM, Rounsaville B, Chevron E. Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. New York: Basic Books; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson SM. Attachment theory a guide for healing couple relationships. In: Rholes WS, Simpson JA, editors. Adult attachment. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. p. 367–87.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Makinen JA, Johnson SM. Resolving attachment injuries in couples using emotionally focused therapy: steps toward forgiveness and reconciliation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1055–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1563–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Treatment of borderline personality disorder with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization: an 18-month follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bateman A, Fonagy P. 8-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder: mentalization-based treatment versus treatment as usual. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:631–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:1355–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fonagy P, Leigh T, Steele M, Steele H, Kennedy R, Mattoon G, et al. The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:22–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Reis S, Grenyer BFS. Fearful attachment, working alliance and treatment response for individuals with major depression. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2004;11:414–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Strauss B, Kirchmann H, Eckert J, Lobo-Drost A, Marquet A, Papenhausen R, et al. Attachment characteristics and treatment outcome following inpatient psychotherapy: results of a multisite study. Psychother Res. 2006; 16:579–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stalker CA, Gebotys R, Harper K. Insecure attachment as a predictor of outcome following inpatient trauma treatment for women survivors of childhood abuse. Bull Menninger Clin. 2005;69:137–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tasca GA, Kerri R, Conrad G, Balfou L, Gayton J, Lybanon V, et al. Attachment scales predict outcome in a randomized controlled trial of two group therapies for binge eating disorder: an aptitude by treatment interaction. Psychother Res. 2006;16:106–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Meyer B, Pilkonis PA, Proiette JM, Heape CL, Egan M. Attachment styles and personality disorders as predictors of symptom course. J Pers Disord. 2001;15:371–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pilkonis PA. Personality prototypes among depressives: themes of dependency and autonomy. J Pers Disord. 1988;2:144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cyranowski JM, Bookwala J, Feske U, Houck P, Pilkonis P, Kostelnik B, et al. Adult attachment profiles, interpersonal difficulties, and response to interpersonal psychotherapy in women with recurrent major depression. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2002;21:191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lawson DM, Brossart DF. Attachment, interpersonal problems, and treatment outcome in group therapy for intimate partner violence. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2009;10:288–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. McBride C, Atkinson L, Quilty LC, Bagby MR. Attachment as moderator of treatment outcome in major depression: a randomized control trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavior therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1041–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dolan RT, Arnkoff DB, Glass CR. Client attachment style and the psychotherapist’s interpersonal stance. Psychother. 1993;30:408–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Eames V, Roth A. Patient attachment orientation and the early working alliance: a study of patient and therapist reports of alliance quality and ruptures. Psychother Res. 2000;10:421–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Goldman GA, Anderson T. Quality of object relations and security of attachment as predictors of early therapeutic alliance. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hietanen OM, Punamäki R. Attachment and early working alliance in adult psychiatric inpatients. J Ment Health. 2006;15:423–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Satterfield WA, Lyddon WJ. Client attachment and perceptions of the working alliance with counselor trainees. J Couns Psychol. 1998;42:187–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mallinckrodt B, Porter MJ, Kivlighan DM. Client attachment to therapist, depth of in-session exploration, and object relations in brief psychotherapy. Psychother Theor Res Pract Training. 2005;42:85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Levy KN, Temes CM, Critchfield KL. Differential use of psychotherapy treatment by young adults as a function of sex, ethnicity, religion, and adult attachment style. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Riggs SA, Jacobvitz D. Expectant parents’ representations of early attachment relationships: associations with mental health and family history. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hoermann S, Clarkin JF, Hull JW, Fertuck EA. Attachment dimensions as predictors of medical hospitalizations in individuals with DSM-IV Cluster B personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 2004;18:595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Vogel DL, Wei M. Adult attachment and help-seeking intent: the mediating roles of psychological distress and perceived social support. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:347–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dozier M. Attachment organization and treatment use for adults with serious psychopathological disorders. Dev Psychopathol. 1990;2:47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kobak RR. The attachment Q-sort. Unpublished manuscript. Newark: University of Delaware; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, Walker EA. The patient–provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Dozier M, Lomax L, Tyrrell CL, Lee S. The challenge of treatment for clients with dismissing states of mind. Attach Hum Dev. 2001;3:62–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Shapiro D, Hardy G, Aldridge J, Davidson C, Rowe C, Reilly S. Therapist responsiveness to client attachment styles and issues observed in client-identified significant events in psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 1999;9:36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Diamond D, Clarkin J, LeVine H, Levy K, Foelsch P, Yeomans F. Borderline conditions and attachment: a preliminary report. Psychoanal Inq. 1999;19:831–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dozier M, Cue KL, Barnett L. Clinicians as caregivers: role of attachment organization in treatment. J Consult Clin Psychiatry. 1994;62(4):793–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Slade A. Attachment theory and research: implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR, editors. Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 575–94.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Slade A. The development and organization of attachment: implications for psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2000;48:1147–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Slade A. The move from categories to process: attachment phenomena and clinical evaluation. Inf Mental Health J. 2004;25:269–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bruck E, Winston A, Aderholt S, Muran JC. Predictive validity of patient and therapist attachment and introject styles. Am J Psychother. 2006;60:393–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schauenburg H, Buchheim A, Beckh K, Nolte T, Brenk-Franz K, Leichsenring F, et al. The influence of psychodynamically oriented therapists’ attachment representations on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 2010;20:193–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zegers MA, Schuengel C, van IJzendoorn MH, Janssens JMAM. Attachment representations of institutionalized adolescents and their professional caregivers: predicting the development of therapeutic relationships. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006;76:325–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Tyrrell CL, Dozier M, Teague GB, Fallot RD. Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: the importance of attachment states of mind. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(5):725–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Hardy GE, Stiles WB, Barkham M, Startup M. Therapist responsiveness to client interpersonal styles during time-limited treatments for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:304–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Hardy GE, Cahill J, Shapiro DA, Barkham M, Rees A, Macaskill N. Client interpersonal and cognitive styles as predictors of response to time-limited cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:841–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Kanninen K, Salo J, Punamäki R. Attachment patterns and working alliance in trauma therapy for victims of political violence. Psychother Res. 2000;10:435–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Rubino G, Barker C, Roth T, Fearon P. Therapist empathy and depth of interpretation in response to potential alliance ruptures: the role of therapist and patient attachment styles. Psychother Res. 2000;10:408–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Dinge U, Strack M, Sachsse T, Schauenburg H. Therapists’ attachment, patients’ interpersonal problems, and alliance development over time in inpatient psychotherapy. Psychother Theor Res Pract Training. 2009;46:277–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Stiles WB, Honos-Webb L, Surko M. Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 1998;5:439–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Travis LA, Bliwise NG, Binder JL, Horne-Moyer HL. Changes in clients’ attachment styles over the course of time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother Theor Res Pract Training. 2001;38:149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Diamond D, Clarkin JF, Stovall-McClough KC, Levy KN, Foelsch PA, Levine H, et al. Patient–therapist attachment: impact on the therapeutic process and outcome. In: Cortina M, Marrone M, editors. Attachment theory and the psychoanalytic process. London: Whurr Publishers, Ltd; 2003. p. 127–78.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Levy KN, Kelly KM, Meehan KB, Reynoso JS, Clarkin JF, Lenzenweger MF, et al. Change in attachment patterns and reflective function in the treatment of borderline personality disorder with transference focused psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1027–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Levy KN, Diamond D, Yeomans FE, Clarkin JF, Kernberg OF. Changes in attachment, reflection function, and object representation in the psychodynamic treatment of borderline personality disorder. Unpublished manuscript; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Muller RT, Rosenkranz SE. Attachment and treatment response among adults in inpatient treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychother Theor Res Pract Training. 2009;46:82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Samstag LW, Muran JC, Wachtel PL, Slade A, Safran JD. Evaluating negative process: a comparison of working alliance, interpersonal behavior, and narrative coherency among three psychotherapy outcome conditions. Am J Psychother. 2008;62:165–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Clarkin JF, Yeomans F, Kernberg OF. Psychotherapy of borderline personality. New York: Wiley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Eagle M, Wolitzky DL. Adult psychotherapy from the perspectives of attachment theory and psychoanalysis. In: Obegi JH, Berant E, editors. Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults. New York: Guilford Press; 2009. p. 351–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Kenneth N. Levy Ph.D. & Christina M. Temes B.A.

  2. Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA

    Kevin B. Meehan Ph.D.

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Frank E. Yeomans M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Kenneth N. Levy Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin B. Meehan Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christina M. Temes B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frank E. Yeomans M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth N. Levy Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Parkman St., Boston, 02114, Massachusetts, USA

    Raymond A. Levy

  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Morrimac Street 101, Boston, 02114, Massachusetts, USA

    J. Stuart Ablon

  3. and Psychoanalysis, International Psychoanalytic University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Stromstr. 3, Berlin, 10555, Germany

    Horst Kächele

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, K.N., Meehan, K.B., Temes, C.M., Yeomans, F.E. (2012). Attachment Theory and Research: Implications for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. In: Levy, R., Ablon, J., Kächele, H. (eds) Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-792-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-792-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-791-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-792-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation