Skip to main content

Sound Stimulation

  • Chapter
Textbook of Tinnitus

Keypoints

  1. 1.

    There is considerable evidence that many forms of tinnitus are caused by central changes that may occur after peripheral lesions.

  2. 2.

    Auditory stimulation is one of the most employed therapeutic methods for tinnitus, and one of the most beneficial.

  3. 3.

    Sound generators that emulate environmental sounds are small devices that allow a person to select the favorite kind of sound at the most comfortable volume.

  4. 4.

    Custom sound generators, for normal hearing persons, are similar to hearing aids, very light, and to be worn behind the ear. They generate a wide-band sound that can be adjusted to the user’s needs.

  5. 5.

    Hearing aids designed for people with tinnitus and hearing loss provide amplification that facilitates auditory stimulation to ameliorate tinnitus.

  6. 6.

    Implantable hearing aids are now used by many people, which made it possible to assess their efficacy in tinnitus treatment.

  7. 7.

    Other devices can be used for tinnitus management for immediate relief before a more complete sound therapy can be initiated.

  8. 8.

    Prosthesis and “open-ear” hearing aids are preferred for treatment of tinnitus. These devices provide amplification in narrow frequency bands which can be adjusted to coincide with the frequencies of the patient’s hearing loss.

  9. 9.

    Sound stimulation has its beneficial effect on most forms of tinnitus by activating neural plasticity, which requires time to develop. The time it takes for sound stimulation to reduce an individual’s tinnitus varies and may require a 6- to 8-month time frame.

  10. 10.

    The selection of hearing aids must be tailored to individual patients, based on the patient’s clinical picture.

  11. 11.

    The specific guidelines on hearing aid device adaptation are crucial for an effective auditory stimulation of tinnitus-affected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Combi:

Combination hearing aid

dB:

Decibel

Hz:

Hertz

SA:

Spontaneous activity

TRT:

Tinnitus retraining therapy

References

  1. Tonndorf J (1987) The analogy between tinnitus and pain: a suggestion for a physiological basis of chronic tinnitus. Hear Res 28:271–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jastreboff PJ (1990) Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 8:221–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Norena AJ and JJ Eggermont (2003) Changes in spontaneous neural activity immediately after an acoustic trauma: implications for neural correlates of tinnitus. Hear Res 183:137–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Norena A, C Micheyl, S Chery-Croze et al (2002) Psycho­acoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 7:358–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans EF and TA Borerwe (1982) Ototoxic effects of salicylates on the responses of single cochlear nerve fibres and on cochlear potentials. Br J Audiol 16:101–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puel JL, J Ruel, M Guitton et al (2002) The inner hair cell synaptic complex: physiology, pharmacology and new therapeutic strategies. Audiol Neurootol 7:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Puel JL (2007) Cochlear NMDA receptor blockade prevents salicylate-induced tinnitus. B-Ent 3 Suppl 7:19–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jastreboff PJ and CT Sasaki (1994) An animal model of tinnitus: a decade of development. Am J Otol 15:19–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stypulkowski PH (1990) Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity. Hear Res 46:113–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muller M, R Klinke, W Arnold et al (2003) Auditory nerve fibre responses to salicylate revisited. Hear Res 183:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen GD and PJ Jastreboff (1995) Salicylate-induced abnormal activity in the inferior colliculus of rats. Hear Res 82:158–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ochi K and JJ Eggermont (1996) Effects of salicylate on neural activity in cat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 95:63–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jastreboff PJ and CT Sasaki (1986) Salicylate-induced changes in spontaneous activity of single units in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 80:1384–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer CA, TJ Brozoski, TM Holder et al (2000) Effects of chronic salicylate on GABAergic activity in rat inferior colliculus. Hear Res 147:175–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang HT, B Luo, KQ Zhou et al (2006) Sodium salicylate reduces inhibitory postsynaptic currents in neurons of rat auditory cortex. Hear Res 215:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun W, J Lu, D Stolzberg et al (2009) Salicylate increases the gain of the central auditory system. Neuroscience 159:325–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Su YY, B Luo, HT Wang et al (2009) Differential effects of sodium salicylate on current-evoked firing of pyramidal neurons and fast-spiking interneurons in slices of rat auditory cortex. Hear Res 253:60–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liberman MC and LW Dodds (1984) Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 16:55-74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberman MC and LW Dodds (1984) Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates. Hear Res 16:43–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Milbrandt JC, TM Holder, MC Wilson et al (2000) GAD levels and muscimol binding in rat inferior colliculus following acoustic trauma. Hear Res 147:251–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Argence M, I Saez, R Sassu et al (2006) Modulation of inhibitory and excitatory synaptic transmission in rat inferior colliculus after unilateral cochleectomy: an in situ and immunofluorescence study. Neuroscience 141:1193–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotak VC, S Fujisawa, FA Lee et al (2005) Hearing loss raises excitability in the auditory cortex. J Neurosci 25: 3908–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong S, WH Mulders, J Rodger et al (2009) Changes in neuronal activity and gene expression in guinea-pig auditory brainstem after unilateral partial hearing loss. Neuroscience 159:1164–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Norena AJ and JJ Eggermont (2005) Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma reduces hearing loss and prevents cortical map reorganization. J Neurosci 25:699–705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson D and DR Irvine (1989) Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J Comp Neurol 282:456–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Norena AJ, M Tomita and JJ Eggermont (2003) Neural changes in cat auditory cortex after a transient pure-tone trauma. J Neurophysiol 90:2387–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulders WH and D Robertson (2009) Hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain after acoustic trauma: dependence on cochlear activity. Neuroscience 164:733–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Norena AJ and S Chery-Croze (2007) Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. Neuroreport 18:1251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moffat G, K Adjout, S Gallego et al (2009) Effects of hearing aid fitting on the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus. Hear Res 254:82–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Formby C, LP Sherlock and SL Gold, (2003) Adaptive recalibration of chronic auditory gain : interim findings, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar, Perth, Australia : March 5th-9th, 2002, RB Patuzzi, Editor. 2003, Physiology Dept., University of Western Australia: Perth, Australia. 165–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Norena AJ and JJ Eggermont (2006) Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma abolishes neural signs of tinnitus. Neuroreport 17:559–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Han BI, HW Lee, TY Kim et al (2009) Tinnitus: characteristics, causes, mechanisms, and treatments. J Clin Neurol 5:11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jastreboff PJ (2007) Tinnitus retraining therapy. Prog Brain Res 166:415–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Del Bo L and U Ambrosetti (2007) Hearing aids for the treatment of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 166:341–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Trotter MI and I Donaldson (2008) Hearing aids and tinnitus therapy: a 25-year experience. J Laryngol Otol 122:1052–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vernon JA and MB Meikle, (2000) Tinnitus masking, in Tinnitus handbook, RS Tyler, Editor. 2000, Singular Pub. Group: San Diego. 313–56.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jastreboff PJ and JWP Hazell (2004) Tinnitus retraining therapy: implementing the neurophysicological model. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 276.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Del Bo L, U Ambrosetti, M Bettinelli et al (2006) Using open-ear hearing aids in tinnitus therapy. Hear Rev 13:30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lantz J, OD Jensen, A Haastrup et al (2007) Real-ear measurement verification for open, non-occluding hearing instruments. Int J Audiol 46:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Carrabba L, G Coad, M Costantini et al. Combination open ear instrument for tinnitus sound treatment. in IXth International Tinnitus Seminars 2009. Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Van de Heyning P, K Vermeire, M Diebl et al (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117:645–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holgers KM and BE Hakansson (2002) Sound stimulation via bone conduction for tinnitus relief: a pilot study. Int J Audiol 41:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baguley DM and MD Atlas (2007) Cochlear implants and tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 166:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Surr RK, JA Kolb, MT Cord et al (1999) Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure. J Am Acad Audiol 10:489–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Folmer RL and JR Carroll (2006) Long-term effectiveness of ear-level devices for tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Henry JA, TL Zaugg and MA Schechter (2005) Clinical guide for audiologic tinnitus management II: treatment. Am J Audiol 14:49–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Molini E, M Faralli, C Calenti et al (2009) Personal experience with tinnitus retraining therapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Forti S, S Costanzo, A Crocetti et al (2009) Are results of tinnitus retraining therapy maintained over time?. 18-month follow-up after completion of therapy. Audiol Neurootol 14:286–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hatanaka A, Y Ariizumi and K Kitamura (2008) Pros and cons of tinnitus retraining therapy. Acta Otolaryngol 128: 365–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Baracca GN, S Forti, A Crocetti et al (2007) Results of TRT after eighteen months: Our experience. Int J Audiol 46: 217–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sheldrake JB, JWP Hazell and RL Graham, (1999) Results of tinnitus retraining therapy, in Proceedings of the sixth International Tinnitus Seminar, Cambridge UK September 5th-9th 1999, J Hazell, Editor. 1999, Tinnitus and Hyper­acusis Centre: London. 292–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ito M, K Soma and R Ando (2009) Association between tinnitus retraining therapy and a tinnitus control instrument. Auris Nasus Larynx 36:536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Del Bo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Del Bo, L., Baracca, G., Forti, S., Norena, A. (2011). Sound Stimulation. In: Møller, A.R., Langguth, B., De Ridder, D., Kleinjung, T. (eds) Textbook of Tinnitus. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_74

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-144-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-145-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics