Neural Synchrony and Neural Plasticity in Tinnitus

Keypoints

  1. 1.

    Most individuals with chronic tinnitus have high-frequency hearing loss, induced by noise exposure, otological disease, or the aging process. Physiological evidence suggests that in such individuals, tinnitus is likely caused not by irritative processes that persist in the ear after cochlear injury, but by changes that occur in central auditory pathways when the ear is partly disconnected from the brain.

     
  2. 2.

    In animals, hearing loss induced by experimental noise trauma leads to a reorganization of tonotopic maps in the primary auditory cortex, such that frequencies near the edge of normal hearing come to be overrepresented at the expense of frequencies in the hearing loss region. Neurons show increased spontaneous firing rates in cortical and subcortical auditory structures, and in the auditory cortex, increased synchronous activity in the region of hearing impairment.

     
  3. 3.

    Evidence from physiological, psychoacoustic, and human brain imaging studies suggests that increased neural synchrony (temporally coupled neural activity) in the hearing loss region may be an important mechanism contributing to tinnitus. Tinnitus spectra and residual inhibition functions overlap the region of auditory threshold shift, consistent with this hypothesis.

     
  4. 4.

    Several forms of neural plasticity may contribute to changes in spontaneous firing rates and neural synchrony that develop after hearing loss. Because the tuning of auditory neurons can be modified by acoustic training procedures throughout the lifespan, it may be possible to reverse some of the neural changes underlying tinnitus.

     
  5. 5.

    For this goal to be achieved, it must be possible to modify auditory representations by acoustic training in individuals with tinnitus, and the neural modifications induced by training must intersect with the underlying tinnitus mechanisms. Auditory plasticity in normal hearing individuals and people with tinnitus requires further study.

     

Keywords

Mechanism of tinnitus Neural synchrony Cortical reorganization Neural plasticity Tinnitus spectrum Residual inhibition 

Abbreviations

HL

Hearing level

CF

Center frequency

RI

Residual inhibition

ASSR

Auditory steady-state response

AM

Amplitude modulation

EEG

Electroencephalogram

MEG

Magnetoencephalography

References

  1. 1.
    Robertson D, DRF Irvine (1989) Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J. Comp. Neurol. 282:456–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajan R, DRF Irvine (1998) Neuronal responses across cortical field A1 in plasticity induced by peripheral auditory organ damage. Audiol. Neuro Otol. 3:123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noreña AJ, M Tomita, JJ Eggermont (2003) Neural changes in cat auditory cortex after a transient pure-tone trauma. J. Neurophysiol. 90:2387–2401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rauschecker JP (1999) Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems. Trends Neurosci. 22:74–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eggermont JJ, LE Roberts (2004) The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 27:676–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fritz J, M Elhilali, S Shamma (2005) Active listening: task-dependent plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 206:159–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weinberger NM (2007) Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 229:54–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weisz N, T Hartmann, K Dohrmann et al (2006) High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation. Hear. Res. 222:108–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roberts LE, G Moffat, M Baumann et al (2008) Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9:417–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    House JW, DE Brackman (1981) Tinnitus: surgical treatment. Ciba Found. Symp. 85:204–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rajan R (2001) Plasticity of excitation and inhibition in the receptive field of primary auditory cortical neurons after limited receptor organ damage. Cereb. Cortex. 11:171–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turrigiano GG, SB Nelson (2004) Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5:97–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noreña AJ, JJ Eggermont (2003) Changes in spontaneous neural activity immediately after an acoustic trauma: implications for neural correlates of tinnitus. Hear. Res. 183:137–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eggermont JJ (2007) Correlated neural activity as the driving force for functional changes in auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 229:69–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Llinás R, FJ Urbano, E Leznik et al (2005) Rhythmic and dysrhythmic thalamocortical dynamics: GABA systems and the edge effect. Trends Neurosci. 28:325–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts LE, G Moffat, DJ Bosnyak (2006) Residual inhibition functions in relation to tinnitus spectra and auditory threshold shift. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 556:27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noreña A, C Micheyl, S Chéry-Croze, L Collet (2002) Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol. Neurootol. 7:358–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kay F (2008) Towards improving the assessment of tinnitus pitch. Section of Audiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bosnyak DJ, PE Gander, LE Roberts (2008) The 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in tinnitus tracks age-related deficits in intracortical inhibition but does not follow the tinnitus percept. Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience 2008. Washington: Society of Neuroscience 2008 Planner 850.13.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roberts LE, DJ Bosnyak (2010) Neural synchrony and neural plasticity in tinnitus. In: Searchfield GD, Goodey R Editors. Proceedings of Tinnitus Discovery: Asia-Pacific Tinnitus Symposium. N Z Med J. 123:39–50.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dean I, NS Harper, D McAlpine (2005) Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 8:1684–1689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wienbruch C, I Paul, N Weisz et al (2006) Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus. Neuroimage. 33:180–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weisz N, S Muller, W Schlee et al (2007) The neural code of auditory phantom perception. J. Neurosci. 27:1479–1484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finlayson PG, JA Kaltenbach (2009) Alterations in the spontaneous discharge patterns of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure. Hear. Res. doi:10.1016.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeng C, N Nannapaneni, J Zhou et al (2009) Cochlear damage causes changes in the distribution of vesicular glutamate transporters associated with auditory and nonauditory inputs to the cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 29:4210–4217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cacace AT (2003) Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear. Res. 175:112–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shore SE, S Koehler, M Oldakowski, LF Hughes, S Syed (2008) Dorsal cochlear nucleus responses to somatosensory stimulation are enhanced after noise-induced hearing loss. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27:155–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lockwood AH, MA Wack, RF Burkard et al (2001) The functional anatomy of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze. Neurology. 56:472–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mühlau M, JP Rauschecker, E Oestreicher et al (2006) Structural brain changes in tinnitus. Cereb. Cortex. 16:1283–1288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lanting CP, E de Kleine, P van Dijk (2009) Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: Results from PET and fMRI. Hear. Res. 255:1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schlee W, T Hartmann, B Langguth et al (2009) Abnormal resting-state cortical coupling in chronic tinnitus. BMC Neurosci. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-11.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jastreboff PJ (1995) Tinnitus as a phantom perception: Theories and clinical applications. In: Vernon J, Moeller AR, editors. Mechanisms of Tinnitus Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp 73–94.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Terry AMP, DM Jones, BR Davis, R Slater (1983) Parametric studies of tinnitus masking and residual inhibition. Br. J. Audiol. 17:245–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Markram H, J Lübke, M Frotscher et al (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science. 275:213–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang LI, S Bao, MM Merzenich (2001) Persistent and specific influences of early acoustic environments on primary auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 4:1123–1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Villers-Sidani E, KL Simpson, YF Lu et al (2008) Manipulating critical period closure across different sectors of the primary auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 11:957–965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stanton SG, RV Harrison (1996) Abnormal cochleotopic organization in the auditory cortex of cats reared in a frequency augmented environment. Aud. Neurosci. 2:97–107.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pienkowski M, JJ Eggermont (2009) Long-term, partially-reversible reorganization of frequency tuning in mature cat primary auditory cortex can be induced by passive exposure to moderate-level sounds. Hear. Res. doi:10.1026/j.hearres 2009.07.011.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weinberger NM (2007) Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: a synthesis of two disciplines. Learn. Mem. 14:1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Blake DT, F Strata, AK Churchland, MM Merzenich (2002) Neural correlates of instrumental learning in primary auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:10114–10119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kilgard MP, MM Merzenich (2002) Order-sensitive plasticity in adult primary auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:3205–3209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown M, DR Irvine, VN Park (2004) Perceptual learning on an auditory frequency discrimination task by cats: association with changes in primary auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 14:952–965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kilgard MP, PK Pandya, J Vazquez, A Gehi, CE Schreiner, MM Merzenich (2001) Sensory input directs spatial and temporal plasticity in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 86:326–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Recanzone GH, CE Schreiner, MM Merzenich (1993) Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13:87–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuhl PK (2004) Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat. Rev. 5:831–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alain C, JS Snyder, Y He et al (2007) Changes in auditory cortex parallel rapid perceptual learning. Cereb. Cortex. 17:1074–1084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sheehan KA, GM McArthur, DV Bishop (2005) Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds? Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25:547–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gander PE, DJ Bosnyak, LE Roberts (2010) Acoustic experience but not attention modifies neural population phase expressed in human primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. do1:10.1016 (on-line ahead of print).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bosnyak DJ, RA Eaton, LE Roberts (2004) Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified by training at pitch discrimination with 40-Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb. Cortex. 14:1088–l099.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Okamoto H, H Stracke, O Thiede, C Pantev (2009) Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA doi:10.1073/pnas.0911268107.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alain C, JS Snyder, Y He, KS Reinke (2007) Changes in auditory cortex parallel rapid perceptual learning. Cereb. Cortex. 17:1074–1084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tremblay K, N Kraus, T McGee, C Ponton, B Otis (2001) Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear. Hear. 22:79–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fujioka T, B Ross, R Kakigi, C Pantev, LJ Trainor (2006) One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children. Brain. 129:2593–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Menning H, LE Roberts, C Pantev (2000) Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training. Neuroreport. 11:817–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shahin A, DJ Bosnyak, LJ Trainor, LE Roberts (2003) Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J. Neurosci. 23:5545–5552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shahin A, LE Roberts, LJ Trainor (2004) Enhancement of auditory cortical development by musical experience in children. Neuroreport. 15:1917–1921.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kuriki S, S Kanda, Y Hirata (2006) Effects of musical experience on different components of MEG responses elicited by sequential piano-tones and chords. J. Neurosci. 26:4046–4053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shahin AJ, LE Roberts, C Pantev, M Aziz, TW Picton (2007) Enhanced anterior-temporal processing for complex tones in musicians. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118:209–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shahin AJ, LE Roberts, W Chau, LJ Trainor, LM Miller (2008) Music training leads to the development of timbre-specific gamma band activity. Neuroimage. 41:113–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ross B, K Tremblay (2009) Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners. Hear. Res. 248:48–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and BehaviorMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations