Abstract
In Canada, approximately 20,000 people are diagnosed annually with colon or rectal cancer, and cancer in these two related sites is the second leading cause of cancer deaths [1]. A similar pattern is present in other jurisdictions around the world [2, 3]. Surgical removal of the appropriate bowel segment and attached lymphatic basin is the cornerstone of curative therapy. Unfortunately, many patients do not undergo such resections due to the presence of advanced unresectable disease or underlying patient comorbidities. Population-based data from Ontario, Canada (population 13 million) show that 18 % and 24 % of patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively, do not undergo a resection of their tumor [4]. Other data, also from Ontario, suggest that 10 % of patients undergoing resection of their primary colon or rectal tumor have stage IV or metastatic disease [5] (see Table 36.1). Rarely is stage IV disease curable. Patients who present with metastatic disease do not enter surveillance regimens, but may enter testing regimens that monitor response to therapy. One may estimate then that, in Ontario and likely in many other large populations, approximately 70 % of patients with colon or rectal cancer undergo resective surgery for cure. This chapter addresses surveillance for these patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008, Toronto, Canada, 2008. ISSN 0835-2976. http://www.cancer.ca/canada-wide/about%20cancer/cancer%20statistics/∼/media/CCS/Canada%20wide/Files%20List/English%20files%20heading/pdf%20not%20in%20publications%20section/Canadian%20Cancer%20Society%20Statistics%20PDF%202008_614137951.ashx (Accessed November 19, 2009).
Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:481–8. http://coloncancer.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi  =  1/XJ&sdn  =  coloncancer&cdn  =  health&tm  =  12&gps  =  86_189_931_562&f  =  10&su  =  p284.9.336.ip_p736.8.336.ip_&tt  =  2&bt  =  0&bts  =  0&zu  =  http%3A//dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi098.
Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 200. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.
Nenshi R, Baxter N, Kennedy E, Schultz SE, Gunraj N, Wilton AS, et al. Cancer surgery in Ontario: surgery for colorectal cancer; ICES atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2008. Chapter 4, p. 53–96.
Simunovic M, Coates A, Goldsmith C, Thabane L, Reeson D, Smith A, et al. The cluster-randomized Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: evaluating a quality improvement strategy in surgery. CMAJ. 2010;182(12):1301–1306 [ISRCTN 78363167].
Enblad P, Adami HO, Glimelius B, Krusemo U, Påhlman L. The risk of subsequent primary malignant diseases after cancers of the colon and rectum. A nationwide cohort study. Cancer. 1990;65:2091–100.
Bülow S, Svendsen LB, Mellemgaard A. Metachronous colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990;77:502–5.
Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M, O’Brien M, Gottlieb L, Sternberg S, et al. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.
O’Connell MJ, Campbell ME, Goldberg RM, Grothey A, Seitz JF, Benedetti JK, et al. Survival following recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT data set. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2336–41.
Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Mackay J. Surgery for local recurrence of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:733–47.
Moriya Y. Treatment strategy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36:127–31.
Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group. Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, Earle CC, Cummings B, McLeod R, Zuraw L, Zwaal C. Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer [full report]. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2004 [online update]. 30 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 2–9).
Shah SA, Bromberg R, Coates A, Rempel R, Simunovic M, Gallinger S. Survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma in a large population. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:676–83.
Cummings LC, Payes JD, Cooper GS. Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2007;109:718–26.
Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3433–9.
Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–51.
Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1218–24.
Simunovic M, Stewart L, Zwaal C, Johnston M. Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Panel. Cross-sectional imaging in colorectal cancer: recommendations report. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006. p.20.
Lennon T, Houghton J, Northover J. What is the value of clinical follow-up for colorectal cancer patients? The experience of the CRC/NIH CEA second-look trial. In the proceedings of the Nottingham International Colorectal Cancer Symposium, Nottingham; 1995.
Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H, Graffner H, Tranberg KG. Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:619–26.
Mäkelä JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI. Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1995;130:1062–7.
Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, Toouli J. Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:7–14.
Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jørgensen OD. A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:666–9.
Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R, Ouchemi C, Grattarola M, Peracchia A. Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1127–33.
Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D, et al. Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:418–23.
Rosen M, Chan L, Beart Jr RW, Vucasin P, Anthone G. Follow-up of colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1116–26.
Bruinvels DJ, Stiggelbout AM, Kievit J, van Houwelingen HC, Habbema DF, van de Velde CJ. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1994;219:174–82.
Blomqvist L, Holm T, Göranson H, Jacobsson H, Ohlsén H, Larsson SA. MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in the diagnosis of local recurrence or rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1996;37:779–84.
Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME, et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg. 2006;49:251–8.
Desch CE, Benson 3rd AB, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;20(23):8512–9.
Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:160–7.
Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N, et al. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:807–17.
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. London, UK: Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland; 2007. 117 p.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of colorectal cancer. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2003. 47 p. (SIGN publication; No. 67).
New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Surveillance and management of groups at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG); 2004. 84 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Humana Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simunovic, M. (2013). Colon and Rectum Carcinoma Surveillance Counterpoint: Canada. In: Johnson, F., et al. Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-968-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-969-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)