Skip to main content

Colon and Rectum Carcinoma Surveillance Counterpoint: Canada

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Oncology ((CCO))

  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

In Canada, approximately 20,000 people are diagnosed annually with colon or rectal cancer, and cancer in these two related sites is the second leading cause of cancer deaths [1]. A similar pattern is present in other jurisdictions around the world [2, 3]. Surgical removal of the appropriate bowel segment and attached lymphatic basin is the cornerstone of curative therapy. Unfortunately, many patients do not undergo such resections due to the presence of advanced unresectable disease or underlying patient comorbidities. Population-based data from Ontario, Canada (population 13 million) show that 18 % and 24 % of patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively, do not undergo a resection of their tumor [4]. Other data, also from Ontario, suggest that 10 % of patients undergoing resection of their primary colon or rectal tumor have stage IV or metastatic disease [5] (see Table 36.1). Rarely is stage IV disease curable. Patients who present with metastatic disease do not enter surveillance regimens, but may enter testing regimens that monitor response to therapy. One may estimate then that, in Ontario and likely in many other large populations, approximately 70 % of patients with colon or rectal cancer undergo resective surgery for cure. This chapter addresses surveillance for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008, Toronto, Canada, 2008. ISSN 0835-2976. http://www.cancer.ca/canada-wide/about%20cancer/cancer%20statistics/∼/media/CCS/Canada%20wide/Files%20List/English%20files%20heading/pdf%20not%20in%20publications%20section/Canadian%20Cancer%20Society%20Statistics%20PDF%202008_614137951.ashx (Accessed November 19, 2009).

  2. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:481–8. http://coloncancer.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi  =  1/XJ&sdn  =  coloncancer&cdn  =  health&tm  =  12&gps  =  86_189_931_562&f  =  10&su  =  p284.9.336.ip_p736.8.336.ip_&tt  =  2&bt  =  0&bts  =  0&zu  =  http%3A//dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi098.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 200. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nenshi R, Baxter N, Kennedy E, Schultz SE, Gunraj N, Wilton AS, et al. Cancer surgery in Ontario: surgery for colorectal cancer; ICES atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2008. Chapter 4, p. 53–96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simunovic M, Coates A, Goldsmith C, Thabane L, Reeson D, Smith A, et al. The cluster-randomized Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: evaluating a quality improvement strategy in surgery. CMAJ. 2010;182(12):1301–1306 [ISRCTN 78363167].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Enblad P, Adami HO, Glimelius B, Krusemo U, Påhlman L. The risk of subsequent primary malignant diseases after cancers of the colon and rectum. A nationwide cohort study. Cancer. 1990;65:2091–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bülow S, Svendsen LB, Mellemgaard A. Metachronous colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990;77:502–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M, O’Brien M, Gottlieb L, Sternberg S, et al. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Connell MJ, Campbell ME, Goldberg RM, Grothey A, Seitz JF, Benedetti JK, et al. Survival following recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT data set. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Mackay J. Surgery for local recurrence of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:733–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moriya Y. Treatment strategy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36:127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group. Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, Earle CC, Cummings B, McLeod R, Zuraw L, Zwaal C. Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer [full report]. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2004 [online update]. 30 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 2–9).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shah SA, Bromberg R, Coates A, Rempel R, Simunovic M, Gallinger S. Survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma in a large population. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:676–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cummings LC, Payes JD, Cooper GS. Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2007;109:718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1218–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simunovic M, Stewart L, Zwaal C, Johnston M. Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Panel. Cross-sectional imaging in colorectal cancer: recommendations report. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006. p.20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lennon T, Houghton J, Northover J. What is the value of clinical follow-up for colorectal cancer patients? The experience of the CRC/NIH CEA second-look trial. In the proceedings of the Nottingham International Colorectal Cancer Symposium, Nottingham; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H, Graffner H, Tranberg KG. Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:619–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mäkelä JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI. Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1995;130:1062–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, Toouli J. Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jørgensen OD. A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:666–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R, Ouchemi C, Grattarola M, Peracchia A. Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1127–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D, et al. Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen M, Chan L, Beart Jr RW, Vucasin P, Anthone G. Follow-up of colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1116–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruinvels DJ, Stiggelbout AM, Kievit J, van Houwelingen HC, Habbema DF, van de Velde CJ. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1994;219:174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Blomqvist L, Holm T, Göranson H, Jacobsson H, Ohlsén H, Larsson SA. MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in the diagnosis of local recurrence or rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1996;37:779–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME, et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg. 2006;49:251–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Desch CE, Benson 3rd AB, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;20(23):8512–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N, et al. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:807–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. London, UK: Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland; 2007. 117 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of colorectal cancer. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2003. 47 p. (SIGN publication; No. 67).

    Google Scholar 

  35. New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Surveillance and management of groups at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG); 2004. 84 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Simunovic M.D., M.P.H., F.R.C.S.(C) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Humana Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simunovic, M. (2013). Colon and Rectum Carcinoma Surveillance Counterpoint: Canada. In: Johnson, F., et al. Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-969-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics