Abstract
Over the years, the role of the Wingless-int (Wnt) signaling pathway during embryogenesis has been the focus of many researchers, its role being fundamental for physiological organogenesis. More recently, during adulthood, the Wnt signaling pathway has been found to be involved in the regulation of a myriad of cellular processes, including cellular motility, proliferation, differentiation, survival, and apoptosis. It is therefore unsurprising that when this pathway becomes aberrant through anomalous regulation that cancer ensues. Indeed, this developmental pathway has been involved in cancers of the blood, thyroid, breast, lung, prostate, and colon. Key is the role that Wnt signaling plays in the regulation of stem cell fates, all within tightly regulated “niches.” Careful dissection of the various mechanisms controlling this pathway and the subsequent understanding of their functional significance during tissue homeostasis; how it affects stem cells and how it may contribute to carcinogenesis will result in new molecular-based disease markers and novel therapeutic agents to specifically target these diseases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
REFERENCES
1.Davidson, E.H. and D.H. Erwin, Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science, 2006. 311(5762): pp. 796–800.
2.Rodbell, M., Nobel lecture. Signal transduction: evolution of an idea. Biosci Rep, 1995. 15(3): pp. 117–33.
3. Suel, G.M., et al, An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature, 2006. 440(7083): pp. 545–50.
4. Suel, G.M., et al, Tunability and noise dependence in differentiation dynamics. Science, 2007. 315(5819): pp. 1716–9.
5. Maamar, H., A. Raj, and D. Dubnau, Noise in gene expression determines cell fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science, 2007. 317(5837): pp. 526–9.
6. Martinez Arias, A. and A. Stewart, Molecular Principles of Animal Development, 2002, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Barolo, S. and J.W. Posakony, Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev, 2002. 16(10): pp. 1167–81.
8. Silver, S.J. and I. Rebay, Signaling circuitries in development: insights from the retinal determination gene network. Development, 2005. 132(1): pp. 3–13.
9. Voas, M.G. and I. Rebay, Signal integration during development: insights from the Drosophila eye. Dev Dyn, 2004. 229(1): pp. 162–75.
10. Rose, L.S. and K.J. Kemphues, Early patterning of the C. elegans embryo. Annu Rev Genet, 1998. 32: pp. 521–45.
11. Newman-Smith, E.D. and J.H. Rothman, The maternal-to-zygotic transition in embryonic patterning of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 1998. 8(4): pp. 472–80.
12. Platzer, U. and H.P. Meinzer, Genetic networks in the early development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Int Rev Cytol, 2004. 234: pp. 47–100.
13. Brennan, K., et al, The abruptex mutations of notch disrupt the establishment of proneural clusters in Drosophila. Dev Biol, 1999. 216(1): pp. 230–42.
14. Carmena, A., S. Speicher, and M. Baylies, The PDZ protein Canoe/AF-6 links Ras-MAPK, Notch and Wingless/Wnt signaling pathways by directly interacting with Ras, Notch and Dishevelled. PLoS ONE, 2006. 1: p. e66.
15. Strutt, D., et al, Asymmetric localization of frizzled and the determination of notch-dependent cell fate in the Drosophila eye. Curr Biol, 2002. 12(10): pp. 813–24.
16. Tomlinson, A. and G. Struhl, Delta/Notch and Boss/Sevenless signals act combinatorially to specify the Drosophila R7 photoreceptor. Mol Cell, 2001. 7(3): pp. 487–95.
17. Rijsewijk, F., et al, The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell, 1987. 50(4): pp. 649–57.
18. Widelitz, R., Wnt signaling through canonical and non-canonical pathways: recent progress. Growth Factors, 2005. 23(2): pp. 111–6.
19. Akiyama, T., Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2000. 11(4): pp. 273–82.
20. Veeman, M.T., J.D. Axelrod, and R.T. Moon, A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of beta-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev Cell, 2003. 5(3): pp. 367–77.
21. Nusse, R., Cell biology: relays at the membrane. Nature, 2005. 438(7069): pp. 747–9.
22. Kramps, T., et al, Wnt/wingless signaling requires BCL9/legless-mediated recruitment of pygopus to the nuclear beta-catenin-TCF complex. Cell, 2002. 109(1): pp. 47–60.
23. Krieghoff, E., J. Behrens, and B. Mayr, Nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution of beta-catenin is regulated by retention. J Cell Sci, 2006. 119(Pt 7): pp. 1453–63.
24. Sampietro, J., et al, Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/BCL9/Tcf4 complex. Mol Cell, 2006. 24(2): pp. 293–300.
25. Cavallo, R.A., et al, Drosophila Tcf and Groucho interact to repress Wingless signalling activity. Nature, 1998. 395(6702): pp. 604–8.
26. Logan, C.Y. and R. Nusse, The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2004. 20: pp. 781–810.
27. Chen, G., et al, A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor groucho in Drosophila development. Genes Dev, 1999. 13(17): pp. 2218–30.
28. Oishi, I., et al, The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells, 2003. 8(7): pp. 645–54.
29. Chen, A.E., D.D. Ginty, and C.M. Fan, Protein kinase A signalling via CREB controls myogenesis induced by Wnt proteins. Nature, 2005. 433(7023): pp. 317–22.
30. Miller, J.R., The Wnts. Genome Biol, 2002. 3(1): p. REVIEWS3001.
31. Hofmann, K., A superfamily of membrane-bound O-acyltransferases with implications for Wnt signaling. Trends Biochem Sci, 2000. 25(3): pp. 111–2.
32. Willert, K., et al, Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature, 2003. 423(6938): pp. 448–52.
33. Zhai, L., D. Chaturvedi, and S. Cumberledge, Drosophila wnt-1 undergoes a hydrophobic modification and is targeted to lipid rafts, a process that requires porcupine. J Biol Chem, 2004. 279(32): pp. 33220–7.
34. Banziger, C., et al, Wntless, a conserved membrane protein dedicated to the secretion of Wnt proteins from signaling cells. Cell, 2006. 125(3): pp. 509–22.
35. Bartscherer, K., et al, Secretion of Wnt ligands requires Evi, a conserved transmembrane protein. Cell, 2006. 125(3): pp. 523–33.
36. Lin, X., Functions of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell signaling during development. Development, 2004. 131(24): pp. 6009–21.
37. Bhanot, P., et al, A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature, 1996. 382(6588): pp. 225–30.
38. Liu, T., et al, G protein signaling from activated rat frizzled-1 to the beta-catenin-Lef-Tcf pathway. Science, 2001. 292(5522): pp. 1718–22.
39. Tamai, K., et al, LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature, 2000. 407(6803): pp. 530–5.
40. Lu, W., et al, Mammalian Ryk is a Wnt coreceptor required for stimulation of neurite outgrowth. Cell, 2004. 119(1): pp. 97–108.
41. Mikels, A.J. and R. Nusse, Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-TCF signaling depending on receptor context. PLoS Biol, 2006. 4(4): pp. e115.
42. Hsieh, J.C., et al, A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities. Nature, 1999. 398(6726): pp. 431–6.
43. Jones, S.E. and C. Jomary, Secreted frizzled-related proteins: searching for relationships and patterns. Bioessays, 2002. 24(9): pp. 811–20.
44. Uren, A., et al, Secreted frizzled-related protein-1 binds directly to Wingless and is a biphasic modulator of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem, 2000. 275(6): pp. 4374–82.
45. Fedi, P., et al, Isolation and biochemical characterization of the human Dkk-1 homologue, a novel inhibitor of mammalian Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem, 1999. 274(27): pp. 19465–72.
46. Ehebauer, M.T., et al, High-resolution crystal structure of the human Notch 1 ankyrin domain. Biochem J, 2005. 392(Pt 1): pp. 13–20.
47. Nam, Y., et al, Structural requirements for assembly of the CSL.intracellular Notch1.Mastermind-like 1 transcriptional activation complex. J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(23): pp. 21232–9.
48. Nam, Y., et al, Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell, 2006. 124(5): pp. 973–83.
49. Zweifel, M.E., et al, Structure and stability of the ankyrin domain of the Drosophila Notch receptor. Protein Sci, 2003. 12(11): pp. 2622–32.
50. Kopan, R., Notch: a membrane-bound transcription factor. J Cell Sci, 2002. 115(Pt 6): pp. 1095–7.
51. Bray, S.J., Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2006. 7(9): pp. 678–89.
52. Ehebauer, M., P. Hayward, and A.M. Arias, Notch, a universal arbiter of cell fate decisions. Science, 2006. 314(5804): pp. 1414–5.
53. Le Borgne, R., Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2006. 18(2): pp. 213–22.
54. Jaekel, R. and T. Klein, The Drosophila Notch inhibitor and tumor suppressor gene lethal (2) giant discs encodes a conserved regulator of endosomal trafficking. Dev Cell, 2006. 11(5): pp. 655–69.
55. Moberg, K.H., et al, Mutations in erupted, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian tumor susceptibility gene 101, elicit non-cell-autonomous overgrowth. Dev Cell, 2005. 9(5): pp. 699–710.
56. Thompson, B.J., et al, Tumor suppressor properties of the ESCRT-II complex component Vps25 in Drosophila. Dev Cell, 2005. 9(5): pp. 711–20.
57. Vaccari, T. and D. Bilder, The Drosophila tumor suppressor vps25 prevents nonautonomous overproliferation by regulating notch trafficking. Dev Cell, 2005. 9(5): pp. 687–98.
58. Couso, J.P. and A. Martinez Arias, Notch is required for wingless signaling in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell, 1994. 79(2): pp. 259–72.
59. Hing, H.K., X. Sun, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, Modulation of wingless signaling by Notch in Drosophila. Mech Dev, 1994. 47(3): pp. 261–8.
60. Klein, T. and A.M. Arias, The vestigial gene product provides a molecular context for the interpretation of signals during the development of the wing in Drosophila. Development, 1999. 126(5): pp. 913–25.
61. Zecca, M. and G. Struhl, Recruitment of cells into the Drosophila wing primordium by a feed-forward circuit of vestigial autoregulation. Development, 2007. 134(16): pp. 3001–10.
62. Klein, T. and A.M. Arias, Interactions among Delta, Serrate and Fringe modulate Notch activity during Drosophila wing development. Development, 1998. 125(15): pp. 2951–62.
63. Diaz-Benjumea, F.J. and S.M. Cohen, Serrate signals through Notch to establish a Wingless-dependent organizer at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Development, 1995. 121(12): pp. 4215–25.
64. Neumann, C.J. and S.M. Cohen, A hierarchy of cross-regulation involving Notch, wingless, vestigial and cut organizes the dorsal/ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development, 1996. 122(11): pp. 3477–85.
65. Micchelli, C.A., E.J. Rulifson, and S.S. Blair, The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development, 1997. 124(8): pp. 1485–95.
66. de Celis, J.F. and S. Bray, Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development, 1997. 124(17): pp. 3241–51.
67. Mahoney, M.B., et al, Presenilin-based genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster identify novel notch pathway modifiers. Genetics, 2006. 172(4): pp. 2309–24.
68. Go, M.J. and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, A genetic screen for novel components of the notch signaling pathway during Drosophila bristle development. Genetics, 1998. 150(1): pp. 211–20.
69. Langdon, T., et al, Notch receptor encodes two structurally separable functions in Drosophila: a genetic analysis. Dev Dyn, 2006. 235(4): pp. 998–1013.
70. Verheyen, E.M., et al, Analysis of dominant enhancers and suppressors of activated Notch in Drosophila. Genetics, 1996. 144(3): pp. 1127–41.
71. Aulehla, A., et al, Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis. Dev Cell, 2003. 4(3): pp. 395–406.
72. Aulehla, A. and B.G. Herrmann, Segmentation in vertebrates: clock and gradient finally joined. Genes Dev, 2004. 18(17): pp. 2060–7.
73. Estrach, S., et al, Jagged 1 is a beta-catenin target gene required for ectopic hair follicle formation in adult epidermis. Development, 2006. 133(22): pp. 4427–38.
74. Cheng, Y.C., et al, Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev Cell, 2004. 6(4): pp. 539–50.
75. Alon, U., An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits, 2006, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
76. Arias, A.M., New alleles of Notch draw a blueprint for multifunctionality. Trends Genet, 2002. 18(4): pp. 168–70.
77. Heitzler, P. and P. Simpson, Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions. Development, 1993. 117(3): pp. 1113–23.
78. de Celis, J.F. and S.J. Bray, The Abruptex domain of Notch regulates negative interactions between Notch, its ligands and Fringe. Development, 2000. 127(6): pp. 1291–302.
79. Ramain, P., et al, Novel Notch alleles reveal a Deltex-dependent pathway repressing neural fate. Curr Biol, 2001. 11(22): pp. 1729–38.
80. Brennan, K., et al, Wingless modulates the effects of dominant negative notch molecules in the developing wing of Drosophila. Dev Biol, 1999. 216(1): pp. 210–29.
81. Suzuki, D. and Griffiths, A., An Introduction to Genetic Analysis, 1976, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
82. Brennan, K., M. Baylies, and A.M. Arias, Repression by Notch is required before Wingless signalling during muscle progenitor cell development in Drosophila. Curr Biol, 1999. 9(13): pp. 707–10.
83. Carmena, A., et al, Combinatorial signaling codes for the progressive determination of cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm. Genes Dev, 1998. 12(24): pp. 3910–22.
84. Brennan, K., et al, A functional analysis of Notch mutations in Drosophila. Genetics, 1997. 147(1): pp. 177–88.
85. Heitzler, P. and P. Simpson, The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell, 1991. 64(6): pp. 1083–92.
86. Lawrence, N., et al, Notch signaling targets the Wingless responsiveness of a Ubx visceral mesoderm enhancer in Drosophila. Curr Biol, 2001. 11(6): pp. 375–85.
87. Hayward, P., T. Kalmar, and A.M. Arias, Wnt/Notch signalling and information processing during development. Development, 2008. 135(3): pp. 411–24.
88. Galceran, J., et al, LEF1-mediated regulation of Delta-like1 links Wnt and Notch signaling in somitogenesis. Genes Dev, 2004. 18(22): pp. 2718–23.
89. Pourquie, O., The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science, 2003. 301(5631): pp. 328–30.
90. McMahon, A.P., More surprises in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell, 2000. 100(2): pp. 185–8.
91. Ingham, P.W., Transducing Hedgehog: the story so far. EMBO J, 1998. 17(13): pp. 3505–11.
92. Goodrich, L.V. and M.P. Scott, Hedgehog and patched in neural development and disease. Neuron, 1998. 21(6): pp. 1243–57.
93. Lee, J.J., et al, Secretion and localized transcription suggest a role in positional signaling for products of the segmentation gene hedgehog. Cell, 1992. 71(1): pp. 33–50.
94. Kalderon, D., Transducing the hedgehog signal. Cell, 2000. 103(3): pp. 371–4.
95. Porter, J.A., K.E. Young, and P.A. Beachy, Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science, 1996. 274(5285): pp. 255–9.
96. Pepinsky, R.B., et al, Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J Biol Chem, 1998. 273(22): pp. 14037–45.
97. Denef, N., et al, Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell, 2000. 102(4): pp. 521–31.
98. Stone, D.M., et al, The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature, 1996. 384(6605): pp. 129–34.
99. Taipale, J., et al, Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature, 2000. 406(6799): pp. 1005–9.
100. Aza-Blanc, P., et al, Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor. Cell, 1997. 89(7): pp. 1043–53.
101. Robbins, D.J., et al, Hedgehog elicits signal transduction by means of a large complex containing the kinesin-related protein costal2. Cell, 1997. 90(2): pp. 225–34.
102. Chen, C.H., et al, Nuclear trafficking of Cubitus interruptus in the transcriptional regulation of Hedgehog target gene expression. Cell, 1999. 98(3): pp. 305–16.
103. Freeman, M., Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature, 2000. 408(6810): pp. 313–9.
104. Hooper, J.E. and M.P. Scott, Communicating with Hedgehogs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2005. 6(4): pp. 306–17.
105. Gregorieff, A. and H. Clevers, Wnt signaling in the intestinal epithelium: from endoderm to cancer. Genes Dev, 2005. 19(8): pp. 877–90.
106. Taipale, J. and P.A. Beachy, The Hedgehog and Wnt signalling pathways in cancer. Nature, 2001. 411(6835): pp. 349–54.
107. McMahon, A.P., P.W. Ingham, and C.J. Tabin, Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2003. 53: pp. 1–114.
108. Noramly, S., A. Freeman, and B.A. Morgan, Beta-catenin signaling can initiate feather bud development. Development, 1999. 126(16): pp. 3509–21.
109. Bitgood, M.J. and A.P. McMahon, Hedgehog and Bmp genes are coexpressed at many diverse sites of cell-cell interaction in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol, 1995. 172(1): pp. 126–38.
110. Reddy, S., et al, Characterization of Wnt gene expression in developing and postnatal hair follicles and identification of Wnt5a as a target of Sonic hedgehog in hair follicle morphogenesis. Mech Dev, 2001. 107(1–2): pp. 69–82.
111. Heemskerk, J. and S. DiNardo, Drosophila hedgehog acts as a morphogen in cellular patterning. Cell, 1994. 76(3): pp. 449–60.
112. Silva-Vargas, V., et al, Beta-catenin and hedgehog signal strength can specify number and location of hair follicles in adult epidermis without recruitment of bulge stem cells. Dev Cell, 2005. 9(1): pp. 121–31.
113. Iwatsuki, K., et al, Wnt signaling interacts with Shh to regulate taste papilla development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007. 104(7): pp. 2253–8.
114. van den Brink, G.R., et al, Indian Hedgehog is an antagonist of Wnt signaling in colonic epithelial cell differentiation. Nat Genet, 2004. 36(3): pp. 277–82.
115. Akiyoshi, T., et al, Gli1, downregulated in colorectal cancers, inhibits proliferation of colon cancer cells involving Wnt signalling activation. Gut, 2006. 55(7): pp. 991–9.
116. Crittenden, S.L., et al, A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 2002. 417(6889): pp. 660–3.
117. Xie, T. and A.C. Spradling, A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science, 2000. 290(5490): pp. 328–30.
118. Kiger, A.A., H. White-Cooper, and M.T. Fuller, Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation. Nature, 2000. 407(6805): pp. 750–4.
119. Palmer, T.D., A.R. Willhoite, and F.H. Gage, Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol, 2000. 425(4): pp. 479–94.
120. Calvi, L.M., et al, Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature, 2003. 425(6960): pp. 841–6.
121. Zhang, J., et al, Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature, 2003. 425(6960): pp. 836–41.
122. Kiel, M.J., et al, SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell, 2005. 121(7): pp. 1109–21.
123. Jones, P.H. and F.M. Watt, Separation of human epidermal stem cells from transit amplifying cells on the basis of differences in integrin function and expression. Cell, 1993. 73(4): pp. 713–24.
124. Jensen, U.B., S. Lowell, and F.M. Watt, The spatial relationship between stem cells and their progeny in the basal layer of human epidermis: a new view based on whole-mount labelling and lineage analysis. Development, 1999. 126(11): pp. 2409–18.
125. Garcion, E., et al, Generation of an environmental niche for neural stem cell development by the extracellular matrix molecule tenascin C. Development, 2004. 131(14): pp. 3423–32.
126. Ohta, M., et al, Suppression of hematopoietic activity in tenascin-C-deficient mice. Blood, 1998. 91(11): pp. 4074–83.
127. Batlle, E., et al, Beta-catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the intestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/ephrinB. Cell, 2002. 111(2): pp. 251–63.
128. Reya, T., et al, A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature, 2003. 423(6938): pp. 409–14.
129. Korinek, V., et al, Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat Genet, 1998. 19(4): pp. 379–83.
130. Brennan, K.R. and A.M. Brown, Wnt proteins in mammary development and cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2004. 9(2): pp. 119–31.
131. Weidenfeld, J., Wnt signaling and pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol, 2003. 162(5): pp. 1393–7.
132. Weidenfeld, J., et al., The WNT7b promoter is regulated by TTF-1, GATA6, and Foxa2 in lung epithelium. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(23): pp. 21061–70.
133. Li, C., et al, Wnt5a participates in distal lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol, 2002. 248(1): pp. 68–81.
134. Shu, W., et al, Wnt7b regulates mesenchymal proliferation and vascular development in the lung. Development, 2002. 129(20): pp. 4831–42.
135. Yamaguchi, T.P., et al, A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development, 1999. 126(6): pp. 1211–23.
136. Polesskaya, A., P. Seale, and M.A. Rudnicki, Wnt signaling induces the myogenic specification of resident CD45+ adult stem cells during muscle regeneration. Cell, 2003. 113(7): pp. 841–52.
137. Shackel, N.A., et al, Identification of novel molecules and pathogenic pathways in primary biliary cirrhosis: cDNA array analysis of intrahepatic differential gene expression. Gut, 2001. 49(4): pp. 565–76.
138. Surendran, K. and T.C. Simon, CNP gene expression is activated by Wnt signaling and correlates with Wnt4 expression during renal injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2003. 284(4): pp. F653–62.
139. Monga, S.P., et al, Changes in WNT/beta-catenin pathway during regulated growth in rat liver regeneration. Hepatology, 2001. 33(5): pp. 1098–109.
140. Liu, B.Y., et al, The transforming activity of Wnt effectors correlates with their ability to induce the accumulation of mammary progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004. 101(12): pp. 4158–63.
141. Bhardwaj, G., et al, Sonic hedgehog induces the proliferation of primitive human hematopoietic cells via BMP regulation. Nat Immunol, 2001. 2(2): pp. 172–80.
142. Owens, D.M. and F.M. Watt, Contribution of stem cells and differentiated cells to epidermal tumours. Nat Rev Cancer, 2003. 3(6): pp. 444–51.
143. Pinto, D., et al, Canonical Wnt signals are essential for homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium. Genes Dev, 2003. 17(14): pp. 1709–13.
144. Perez-Losada, J. and A. Balmain, Stem-cell hierarchy in skin cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2003. 3(6): pp. 434–43.
145. Szabowski, A., et al, c-Jun and JunB antagonistically control cytokine-regulated mesenchymal-epidermal interaction in skin. Cell, 2000. 103(5): pp. 745–55.
146. Donjacour, A.A. and G.R. Cunha, Stromal regulation of epithelial function. Cancer Treat Res, 1991. 53: pp. 335–64.
147. Sternlicht, M.D., et al, The stromal proteinase MMP3/stromelysin-1 promotes mammary carcinogenesis. Cell, 1999. 98(2): pp. 137–46.
148. Muller, A., et al, Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature, 2001. 410(6824): pp. 50–6.
149. Al-Hajj, M., et al, Therapeutic implications of cancer stem cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2004. 14(1): pp. 43–7.
150. Bixby, S., et al, Cell-intrinsic differences between stem cells from different regions of the peripheral nervous system regulate the generation of neural diversity. Neuron, 2002. 35(4): pp. 643–56.
151. Wicha, M.S., S. Liu, and G. Dontu, Cancer stem cells: an old idea – a paradigm shift. Cancer Res, 2006. 66(4): pp. 1883–90; discussion 1895–6.
152. Sell, S., Stem cell origin of cancer and differentiation therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2004. 51(1): pp. 1–28.
153. Houghton, J., et al, Stem cells and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol, 2007. 17(3): pp. 191–203.
154. Beachy, P.A., S.S. Karhadkar, and D.M. Berman, Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature, 2004. 432(7015): pp. 324–31.
155. Park, C.H., D.E. Bergsagel, and E.A. McCulloch, Mouse myeloma tumor stem cells: a primary cell culture assay. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1971. 46(2): pp. 411–22.
156. Bruce, W.R. and H. Van Der Gaag, A quantitative assay for the number of murine lymphoma cells capable of proliferation in vivo. Nature, 1963. 199: pp. 79–80.
157. Wodinsky, I. and C.J. Kensler, Growth of L1210 leukemia cells. Nature, 1966. 210(5039): pp. 962.
158. Bergsagel, D.E. and F.A. Valeriote, Growth characteristics of a mouse plasma cell tumor. Cancer Res, 1968. 28(11): pp. 2187–96.
159. Derksen, P.W., et al, Illegitimate WNT signaling promotes proliferation of multiple myeloma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004. 101(16): pp. 6122–7.
160. Chung, E.J., et al, Regulation of leukemic cell adhesion, proliferation, and survival by beta-catenin. Blood, 2002. 100(3): pp. 982–90.
161. Suzuki, H., et al, Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes allows constitutive WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet, 2004. 36(4): pp. 417–22.
162. Lee, A.Y., et al, Expression of the secreted frizzled-related protein gene family is downregulated in human mesothelioma. Oncogene, 2004. 23(39): pp. 6672–6.
163. You, L., et al, Inhibition of Wnt-2-mediated signaling induces programmed cell death in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Oncogene, 2004. 23(36): pp. 6170–4.
164. Hoang, B.H., et al, Expression of LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) as a novel marker for disease progression in high-grade osteosarcoma. Int J Cancer, 2004. 109(1): pp. 106–11.
165. Hoang, B.H., et al, Dickkopf 3 inhibits invasion and motility of Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells by modulating the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway. Cancer Res, 2004. 64(8): pp. 2734–9.
166. Sogabe, Y., et al, Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol, 2008. 32(6): pp. 1253–61.
167. Kaern, M., et al, Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet, 2005. 6(6): pp. 451–64.
168. Elowitz, M.B., et al, Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science, 2002. 297(5584): pp. 1183–6.
169. Gregor, T., et al, Probing the limits to positional information. Cell, 2007. 130(1): pp. 153–64.
170. Raser, J.M. and E.K. O’Shea, Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science, 2004. 304(5678): pp. 1811–4.
171. Arias, A.M. and P. Hayward, Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet, 2006. 7(1): pp. 34–44.
172. Boutros, M., et al, Genome-wide RNAi analysis of growth and viability in Drosophila cells. Science, 2004. 303(5659): pp. 832–5.
173. Lepourcelet, M., et al, Small-molecule antagonists of the oncogenic Tcf/beta-catenin protein complex. Cancer Cell, 2004. 5(1): pp. 91–102.
174. Meijer, L., et al, GSK-3-selective inhibitors derived from Tyrian purple indirubins. Chem Biol, 2003. 10(12): pp. 1255–66.
175. Lum, L., et al, Identification of hedgehog pathway components by RNAi in Drosophila cultured cells. Science, 2003. 299(5615): pp. 2039–45.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work is supported by the Kazan Foundation and the NIH/NCI R011R01CA093708-01A3 Grant. We would like to express our enormous gratitude for the thorough, meticulous and careful constructive reading and feedback of our manuscript by our dear colleague Dr. Geneviève Clément from the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery at the University of California San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yagui-Beltrán, A., He, B., Jablons, D.M. (2009). Wnt Signaling in Cancer: From Embryogenesis to Stem Cell Self-Renewal. In: Teicher, B., Bagley, R. (eds) Stem Cells and Cancer. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-933-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-933-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-932-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-933-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)