Abstract
The bullous dermatitis pattern is characterized by intraepidermal or subepidermal blister formation (Figs. 10.1 and 10.2). This discussion will be limited to diseases in which blister formation is the primary manifestation rather than blisters as a secondary phenomenon (i.e., blisters secondary to contact dermatitis, as discussed in Chap. 2). An understanding of the concept of acantholysis is paramount to any discussion of the intraepidermal vesicular disorders. Acantholysis is the result of loss of appropriate keratinocyte–keratinocyte adherence. This adherence is mediated by tight junctions, adherens junctions, gap junctions, and desmosomes. Desmosomes are critical to keratinocyte adhesion, and they are the last structures to split when acantholysis occurs. Acantholytic disorders that have been well characterized develop as sequelae of desmosomal dysfunction or disruption of the desmosomal connections with the intracellular keratin structural matrix. Keratinocyte–keratinocyte adhesion is a dynamic process because the relationship of one keratinocyte to another must change during epidermal maturation. Thus, acantholysis may be viewed as a loss of equilibrium between the formation and dissolution of junctions. This dysequilibrium may occur primarily when the adhesion junctions are impaired directly or secondarily when keratinocytic viability is affected. Histologically, acantholytic keratinocytes are rounded with condensed eosinophilic cytoplasm, large nuclei, peripheral marginated chromatin and prominent nucleoli. In intraepidermal blistering disease, the blister forms as the result of acantholysis within the epidermis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Harrist T, Schapiro B, Lerner L, Margro C, Ramierez J, Cotton J. Intraepidermal Vesiculopustular Diseases. In: Barnhill R. Crowson A. Magro C. Piepkorn M, editors. Dermatopathology, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill Medical, Columbus, OH 2010.
Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Autoimmune and inherited subepidermal blistering diseases: advances in the clinic and laboratory. Advances in Dermatology 15:113–57, 2000.
Jordon R. Atlas of Bullous Disease. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone. 2000.
Ambros-Rudolph C, Mullegger R, Vaughan-Jones SA, Kerl H, Black M. The specific dermatoses of pregnancy, revisited and reclassified. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 54:395–404, 2006.
Kolanko M, Bickle K, Keehn C, Glass L. Subepidermal blistering disorders: A clinical and histopathologic review. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 23:10–18, 2004.
Weedon D. Skin Pathology 3rd ed., New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2010.
Sardy M, Karpatic S, Merkl B, Paulsson M, Smyth N. Epidermal transglutaminase (T Gase 3) is the autoantigen of dermatitis herpetiformis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 195:747–57, 2002.
Hull C, Liddle M, Hansen N. Elevation of IgA anti-epidermal transglutaminase antibodies in dermatitis herpetiformis. British Journal of Dermatology. 159:120–4, 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billings, S.D., Cotton, J. (2010). Bullous Dermatitis. In: Inflammatory Dermatopathology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-838-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-838-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-837-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-838-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)