Advertisement

Evidence-Based Guidelines for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan

  • Kiyoshi Hasegawa
  • Norihiro Kokudo
Chapter

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has five characteristics that are strikingly different from those of other malignant tumors of the digestive system: (1) a strong causal relationship with hepatitis viruses (especially type B and type C), (2) a major impact of the status of hepatic functional reserve and liver damage on the choice of treatment and the prognosis, (3) a high recurrence rate, with many of the recurrences developing within the liver, and the existence of two major routes of recurrence, i.e., multicentric carcinogenesis and intrahepatic metastasis, (4) the possibility of performing effective treatment, if confined to the liver and liver functional reserve permits, and (5) the existence of a clear outcome determinant as vascular invasion. Because of these characteristics, choosing the method of treatment for HCC is not easy, although several useful methods are available to treat HCC.

Keywords

Evidence-based medicine Clinical practice guidelines Randomized controlled trial Treatment algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Makuuchi M, Kokudo N (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first evidence based guidelines from Japan. World J Gastroenterol 12:828–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, Arii S et al (2008) Development of evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Hepatol Res 38:37–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1997) Classification of primary liver cancer. Kanehara & Co., Ltd., Tokyo p. 21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T et al (1993) Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol 9:298–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Aoki T et al (2008) Multiple tumors and concomitant portal hypertension are not operative contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 134:1908–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vauthey JN, Lauwers GY, Esnaola NF et al (2002) Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:1527–1536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S et al (2000) Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. Hepatology 32:1224–1229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X et al (2002) Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Takayama T et al (2001) Selection criteria for hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus. Ann Surg 233:379–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eddy DM (1990) Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA 263:3077, 3081, 3084Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kokudo N, Sasaki Y, Nakayama T et al (2007) Dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma among Japanese hepatologists, liver surgeons, and primary care physicians. Gut 56:1020–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D et al (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S et al (2005) A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 129:122–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang GT, Lee PH, Tsang YM et al (2005) Percutaneous ethanol injection versus surgical resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Ann Surg 242:36–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y et al (2006) A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 243:321–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M (2008) Surgery or ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma? Ann Surg 247:557–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. for the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2008) Surgical resection vs. percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report of the Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol 49:589–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Todo S, Furukawa H, Tada M; Japanese Liver Transplantation Study Group (2007) Extending indication: role of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 13(11 Suppl 2): S48–S54Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. for SHARP Investigators Study Group (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:378–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiyoshi Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Norihiro Kokudo
    • 2
  1. 1.Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of SurgeryUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of SurgeryUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations