Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cancer Drug Discovery and Development ((CDD&D))

  • 1186 Accesses

Abstract

Platinum compounds are very effective drugs for the treatment of childhood malignancies and their use has contributed to an increase in the long-term survival of children with cancer. Unfortunately the risk of severe disabling effects such as nephro- and ototoxicity is well known among children receiving platinum-based chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Data from literature suggest that very young children are more prone to develop cochlear damage especially when cranial radiotherapy or high cumulative doses are administered.

In view of the increasing number of children safely cured of their tumors it is fundamental that children treated with platinum drugs receive careful, continued, long-term followup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gilmer Knight KR, Kraemer DF, Neuwelt EA. Ototoxicity in children receiving platinum chemotherapy: underestimating a commonly occurring toxicity that may influence academic and social development. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8588–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. English MW, Skinner R, Pearson ADJ, et al. Dose-related nephrotoxicity of carboplatin in children. Br J Cancer 1999;81:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Francesco AM, Ruggiero A, Riccardi R. Cellular and molecular aspects of drugs of the future: oxaliplatin. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002;59:1914–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7:573–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Micetich KC, Barnes D, Erickson LC. A comparative study of the cytotoxicity and DNA-damaging effects of cis-(diammino)(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)-platinum(II) and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) on L1210 cells. Cancer Res 1995;45:4043–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knox RJ, Friedlos F, Lydall DA, et al. Mechanism of cytotoxicity of anticancer platinum drugs: evidence that cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and cis-diammine-(1,1-cyclobutanedi-carboxylato)platinum(II) differ only in the kinetics of their interaction with DNA. Cancer Res 1986;46:1972–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gormley PE, Bull JM, LeRoy AF, et al. Kinetics of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979;25:351–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeConti RC, Toftness BR, Lange RC, et al. Clinical and pharmacological studies with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II). Cancer Res 1973;33:1310–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pratt CB, Hayes A, Green AA, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of cisplatin in children with malignant solid tumours: a phase II study. Cancer Treat Rep 1981;65:1021–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riccardi R, Riccardi A, Di Rocco C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of carbopla-tin in children with brain tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992;30:21–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LI Y, Womer RB, Silber JH. Predicting cisplatin ototoxicity in children: the influence of age and the cumulative dose. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2445–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kretschmar CS, Warren MP, Lavally BL, et al. Ototoxicity of pre-radiation cisplatin for children with central nervous system tumors. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1191–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanvers-Kaminsky C, Krefeld B, Dinnesen AG, et al. Continuous or repeated prolonged cisplatin infusions in children: a prospective study on ototoxicity, platinum concentrations, and standard serum parameters. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;47:183–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gratton MA, Smyth BJ. Cisplatin. Continuous versus bolus. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28:60–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murakami T, Inoue S, Sasaki K, et al. Studies on age-dependent plasma platinum pharmacoki-netics and ototoxicity of cisplatin. Sel Cancer Ther 1990;6:145–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stöhr W, Paulides M, Bielack S, et al. Nephrotoxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin in sarcoma patients: a report from the late effects surveillance system. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:140–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Riedemann L, Lanvers C, Deuster D, et al. Megalin genetic polymorphisms and individual sensitivity to the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Pharmacogenomics J 2008;8:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, A., Riccardi, R. (2009). Platinum Drugs in Children with Cancer. In: Bonetti, A., Leone, R., Muggia, F.M., Howell, S.B. (eds) Platinum and Other Heavy Metal Compounds in Cancer Chemotherapy. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-459-3_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics