Skip to main content

Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Disease

  • Chapter
  • 1714 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

Abstract

Recent advances in computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have revolutionized the diagnostic work-up of aortic disease. Currently, catheter-based angiography is largely used as an adjunct during interventional procedures to treat aortic disease. This chapter reviews recent technical advances in CTA and MRA, and briefl y discusses the roles of carbon dioxide angiography and intravascular ultrasound in aortic interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Costello P, Ecker CP, Tello R, Hartnell GG. Assessment of the thoracic aorta by spiral CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1992 May;158(5):1127–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapira OM, Aldea GS, Cutter SM, Fitzgerald CA, Lazar HL, Shemin R J Improved clinical outcomes after operation of the proximal aorta: a 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Apr;67(4):1030–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tatli S, Yucel EK, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta: current techniques and clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 May; 42 (3) : 565–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Armerding MD, et al. Aortic aneurysmal disease: assessment of stent-graft treat-ment-CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 2000;215:138–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, Mali WP. Spiral CT angiography. A m J Roentgenol. 1993 Jun;160(6):1273–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology. 1998 Nov;209(2): 417–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman, JA. Noninvasive vascular imaging. In: Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites, 1st Ed, Philadelphia: Mosby, 2004:71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sundaram B, Quint LE, Patel HJ, Deeb GM. CT findings following thoracic aortic surgery. Radiographics. 2007 Nov–Dec;27(6):1583–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Napoli A, et-al.. Computed tomography angiography: state-of-the-art imaging using multidetector-row technology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:S32–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lell MM, et-al. New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics. 2006; 26 : S45–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozenblit AM, et-al.. Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):426–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):641–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olin JW, et-al.. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging. Circulation. 2004 June 1;109(21):2626–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Federle MP, Pan KT, Pealer KM. CT criteria for differentiating abdominal hemorrhage: anticoagulation or aortic aneurysm rupture ? Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1324–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rozenblit A, Marin ML, Veith FJ, Cynamon J, Wahl SI, Bakal CW. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1473–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pooley RA. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fundamental physics of MR imaging. Radiographics. 2005 Jul–Aug;25(4):1087–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs MA, Ibrahim TS, Ouwerkerk R. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorials for residents: MR imaging: brief overview and emerging applications. Radiographics. 2007 Jul–Aug;27(4):1213–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bitar R, et-al. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics. 2006 Mar–Apr;26(2):513–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Creasy JL, Price RR, Presbrey T, Goins D, Partain CL, Kessler RM. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1990;175:280–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts D, Siegelman ES. Imaging and MR arteriography of the aorta. In: Body MRI, 1st Ed, Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2005:481–507.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dobson MJ, Hartley RW, Ashleigh R, Watson Y, Hawnaur JM. MR angiography and MR imaging of symptomatic vascular malformations. Clin Radiol. 1997 Aug;52(8):595–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatli S, Lipton MJ, Davison BD, Skorstad RB, Yucel EK. From the RSNA refresher courses: MR imaging of aortic and peripheral vascular disease. Radiographics. 2003 Oct;23 Spec No:S59–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Maki JH, Prince MR. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):13–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994 Apr;191(1):155–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marckmann P, et-al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17:2359–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stafford RB, Sabati M, Mahallati H, Frayne R. 3D non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography with balanced steady-state free precession dixon method. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Feb;59(2):430–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saloner D. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. An introduction to MR angiography. Radiographics. 1995 Mar;15(2):453–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thurnher SA, et-al.. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1997 Nov;205 (2) : 341–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lutz AM, et al. Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):619–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ludman CN, et al.. Feasibility of using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography as the sole imaging modality prior to endovascu-lar repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 May;19(5): 524–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thurnher S, Cejna M. Imaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 Jul;40(4):799–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cejna M, et al.. MR angiography vs CT angiography in the follow-up of niti-nol stent grafts in endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiol. 2002 Oct;12(10):2443–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Engellau L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endo-luminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Mar;15(3):212–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Haulon S, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Jul;22(1):62–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stavropoulos SW, Baum RA. Imaging modalities for the detection and management of endoleaks. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;17(2):154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cohen EI, et al. Time-resolved MR angiography for the classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Mar; 27 (3) : 500–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cho KJ, Hawkins IR, eds. Carbon Dioxide Angiography: Principles, Techniques, and Practice. New York: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, P.S., Williams, D.M. (2009). Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Disease. In: Upchurch, G.R., Criado, E. (eds) Aortic Aneurysms. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-204-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-204-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-203-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-204-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics