Skip to main content

Indwelling Urinary Catheters

Infection and Complications

  • Chapter
Book cover Genitourinary Pain And Inflammation

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 1300 Accesses

Summary

Although often a necessary intervention, urinary catheters are the leading cause of urinary tract infection (UTI) in hospitalized patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. Avoidance of prolonged or any bladder catherization is recommended if possible. Pro-active care should be used to maintain optimal mechanical and antimicrobial operations. Numerous trials of oral antibiotics and urinary acidifying agents, antimicrobial bladder washes, antimicrobial drainage bag solutions, and topical disinfectants confirm that bacteriuria and UTI can be suppressed temporarily, but resistant flora eventually appear. Closed drainage systems remain the cornerstone for preventing catheter-associated UTI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referencens

  1. Cornia PB, Amory JK, Fraser S, Saint S, Lipsky BA. “Computer-based order entry decreases duration of indwelling urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients,” Am J Med, 2003; 114 (5):404–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gubbins PO, McConnell SA, Penzak SR. “Current management of funguria,” Am J Heal-Sys Pharm, 1999; 56 (19):1929–1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Getliffe K. “Managing recurrent urinary catheter blockage: Problems, promises and practicalities,” J WOCN, 2003; 30:146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemke JR, Kasprowicz K, Sandford-Worral P. “Intermittent catheterization for patients with a neurogenic bladder: Sterile versus clean,” J Nurs Care Qual, 2005; 20 (4):302–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liedl B. “Catheter-associated urinary tract infections,” Curr Opin Urol, 2001; 11: 75–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saint S. “Clinical and economic consequences of noscomial catheter-related bacteriuria,” Am J Infect Control, 2000; 28 (1): 68–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saint S, Chenoweth CE. “Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections,” Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2003; 17 (2):411–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saint S, Kaufman SR, Thompson M, Rogers MA, Chenowith CE. “A reminder reduces urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients,” Joint Commision Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2005; 31 (8):455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saint S, Lipsky BA, Door-Goold S. “Indwelling urinary catheters: A one-point restraint?” Ann Intern Med, 2002; 137 (2):125–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saint S, Lipsky BA. “Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Should we? can we? how?” Arch Intern Med, 1999; 159 (8):800–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saint S, Savel RH, Matthay MA. “Enhancing the safety of critically ill patients by reducing urinary and central venous catheter-related infections,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002; 165:1475–1479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saint S, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD, Chenowith C, Fendrick MA. “The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection,” Arch Intern Med, 2000; 160 (17):2670–2675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, Patel UD, Zeemcuk JK. et al. “Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters?” Am J Med, 2000; 109 (6):476–480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Toughhill E. “Indwelling urinary catheters: Common mechanical and pathogenic problems,” AJN, 2005; 105 (5): 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. “Catheter-associated Infections,” Arch Intern Med, 2004; 164:842–850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. “Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection,” Am J Infect Control, 2004; 32:177–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trautner BW, Hull RA, Darouiche RO. “Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection,” Curr Opin Infect Dis, 2005; 18: 37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilde MH. “Urinary tract infection in people with long-term urinary catheters,” J WOCN, 2003; 30:314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilde MH. “Understanding urinary catheter problems from the patient’s point of view,” Home Healthcare Nurse, 2002; 20 (7):449–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michota, F. (2008). Indwelling Urinary Catheters. In: Potts, J.M. (eds) Genitourinary Pain And Inflammation. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-126-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-126-4_26

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-816-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-126-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics