Skip to main content

Proliferation and Cancer Metastasis from the Clinical Point of View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Local Invasion to Metastatic Cancer

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Oncology ((CCO))

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

Lymph node metastases result from specifically lymphotrophic metastatic cells that may have no capacity to grow in vital organs, i.e., brain, liver, lung. Thus, lymph node metastases are predictors, not governors, of overall survival since they do not control survival. This is demonstrated by randomized trials, literature reviews, and meta-analyses of epithelial cancers which show no survival advantage comparing various types of nodal resection, or even observation only. Metastatic lymph nodes demonstrate the primary cancer’s capacity to shed and disperse cells, but these shed cells display organ-specific spread. Thus, liver and lung resections for oligo-metastases cure patients because their metastatic cells may not involve other organs. Even extensive nodal metastases, by themselves, do not cause death, whereas extensive liver, lung, or brain metastases kill their host. Lymph node specificity is displayed in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer, where 75% of patients have node metastases, yet have a 99% 20-year survival. Adjacent nodal metastases are removed in cancer surgery and become a prognostic marker, whereas other distant organs are not sampled as carefully, but also may harbor metastatic cells which could be prognostic markers if discovered. Genetic analysis of cancers predicts detailed biologic behavior that is more accurate than node metastases or size or grade, and will soon displace nodes as the most important prognostic marker, thus removing the necessity of removing lymph nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cady B. Basic principles in surgical oncology. Arch Surg 1997; 132:338–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cady B. Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary in routine management of breast cancer? No. Principles and Practice of Oncology 1998; 12:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gervasoni JE Jr, Taneja C, Chung, MA, Cady B. Biologic and clinical significance of lymphadenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80:1631–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cady B. Fundamentals of contemporary surgical oncology: biologic principles and the threshold concept govern treatment and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(6):777–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oruwari JUN, Chung MA, Koeliker S, et al. Axillary staging using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer. Br Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly 2003; 14(3):307–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung MA, Steinhoff MM, Cady B. Clinical axillary recurrence in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy. Am J Surg 2002; 184:310–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cady B. A randomized trial comparing axillary dissection to no axillary dissection in elderly patients with T1N0 breast cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 242:7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Natarajan S, Taneja C, Cady B. Evolution of lymphadenectomy in surgical oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2005; 14:447–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taneja C, Cady B. Decreasing role of lymphatic system surgery in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89(2):61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cady B. Should positive sentinel node cases have a further axillary dissection? Br Cancer Online 2006; 9(8):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cady B. Regional lymph node metastases, a singular manifestation of the process of clinical metastases in cancer: contemporary animal research and clinical reports suggest unifying concepts. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14(6):1790–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gervasoni JE Jr, Sbayi S, Cady B. Role of lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of solid tumors: an update on the clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14(9):2443–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanghani M, Balk EM, Cady B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials assessing the impact of axillary lymph node dissection on breast cancer outcome in clinically node negative patients. Cancer (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Melvold RW, Sticca RP. Basic and tumor immunology: a review. Surg Oncol Clinics N Am 2007; 16:711–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kauffman HM, McBride MA, Delmonico FL. First report of the United Network for Organ Sharing Transplant Tumor Registry: donors with a history of cancer. Transplantation 2000; 70(12):1747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fidler IJ. The organ microenvironment and cancer metastasis. Differentiation 2002; 70(9–10):498–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher B, Fisher E. Transmigration of lymph nodes by tumor cells. Science 1966; 152(3727):1397–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cady B. Presidential address: beyond risk groups-a new look at differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery 1998; 124(6):947–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Charo I, Ransohoff R. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(6):610–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brodt P, Fallavollita L, Khatib AM, et al. Cooperative regulation of the invasive and metastatic phenotypes by different domains of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor beta subunit. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(36):33608–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cady, B. (2009). Proliferation and Cancer Metastasis from the Clinical Point of View. In: Leong, S. (eds) From Local Invasion to Metastatic Cancer. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-087-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-087-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-086-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-087-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics