Skip to main content

Living Machines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Bioengineering

Abstract

Ecological studies have revealed that nature has an in-built system to restore itself, thereby sustaining its continuity. In other words, natural ecosystems can act as “Living Machines” in keeping the ecosystems habitable. The biological communities – microbes, plants, and animals – serve as the driving force of several living technological innovations – constructed wetlands, Lake Restores, Eco-Restorers, and Reedbeds. These ecologically based technologies are suitable for environment restoration or mitigation, food production through waste conversions, as well as architecture and landscape design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li XZ, Mander U, Ma ZG, Jia Y (2009) Water quality problems and potential for wetlands as treatment systems in the Yangtze Riverdelta, China. Wetlands 29:1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mejáre M, Bülow L (2001) Metal-binding proteins and peptides in bioremediation and phytoremediation of heavy metals. Trends Biotechnol 19(2):67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham W-R, Nogales B, Golyshin P, Pieper HD, Timmis NK (2002) Polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading microbial communities in soil and sediments. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:246–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Samanta KS, Singh VO, Jain KR (2002) Trends Biotechnol 20(6):243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Novotný C, Svobodova K, Erbanova P, Cajthaml T, Kasinath A, Lang E, Šašek V (2004) Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1545–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2004) Report. EPA/600/R-04/075 report, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khan GA (2005) Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. J Trace Elem Med Biol 18:355–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ang LE, Zhao H, Obbard PJ (2005) Recent advances in the bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants via biomolecular engineering. Enzyme Microb Technol 37:487–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thassitou PK, Arvanitoyannis IS (2001) Bioremediation: a novel approach to food waste management. Trends Food Sci Technol 12:185–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atlas MR, Bartha R (1993) Interactions among microbial populations. In: Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, pp 37–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (1985) Oil in the sea: fates and effects. National Academic, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu X, Venosa DA, Suidan TM (2004) Literature review on the use of commercial bioremediation agents for cleanup of oil-contaminated estuarine environments. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Report, EPA/600/R-04/075, Washington DC, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. EPA (1996) A series of fact sheets on nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. EPA841-F-96-004. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. EPA (2000) The quality of our nation’s waters: a summary of national water quality inventory; 1998 report to congress. EPA841-S-00-001. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen P, Brum M (1995) Ecological waste treatment: hope in nature. Peace and Environment News March Issue

    Google Scholar 

  16. Todd J, Brown EJG, Wells E (2003) Ecological design applied. Ecol Eng 20:420–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mistch JW, Jorgensen ES (2003) Ecological engineering: a field whose tie has come. Ecol Eng 20:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Odum HT (1989) Ecological engineering and self-organization. In: Mitsch WJ, Jørgensen SE (eds) Ecological engineering: an introduction to ecotechnology. Wiley, New York, pp 79–101

    Google Scholar 

  19. Todd J (1997) Ecological design, living machines and purification of waters. In: Kibert CJ, Wilson A (eds) Reshaping the built environments; ecology, ethics and economics. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 133–149

    Google Scholar 

  20. Todd J, Josephson B (1996) The design of living technologies for waste treatment. Ecol Eng 6: 109–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrlich KF, Cantin MC, Horsfall FL (1989) Bioaugmentation: biotechnology for improving aquacultural production and environmental protection. In: Murray K (ed) Aquaculture engineering technologies for the future. Inst. Chem. Eng. UK Symposium Ser. No. 111, pp 329–341

    Google Scholar 

  22. Margulis L, Schwartz KV (1988) Five kingdoms; an illustrated guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth. WH Freeman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. Odum HT (1971) Environment, power and society. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gray NJ (1989) Biology of wastewater treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  25. Curds CR, Hawkes HA (eds) (1975) Ecological aspects of used water treatment, vol 1. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Curds CR, Hawkes HA (eds) (1983) Ecological aspects of used water treatment, vol 2. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barlocher F, Arsuffi TL, Newell SY (1989) Digestive enzymes of the saltmarsh periwinkle Littorina irrorate (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Oecologia 80:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawkins A, Bayne B (1992) Physiological interrelations and the regulation of production. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. developments in aquaculture and fisheres science, vol 25. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  29. Karnaukhov VN (1979) The role of filtrator molluscs rich in carotenoid in the self cleaning of fresh waters. Symp Biol Hung 19:151–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. EPA (2004) Constructed treatment wetlands: wetland resources; EPA843-F-03-013. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. EPA (2000) Guiding principles for constructed treatment wetlands: providing for water quality and wildlife habitat; EPA843-B-03-003. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. EPA (1993) Constructed treatment wetlands for wastewater treatment and wildlife habitat: EPA832-R-93-005. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Living Technologies Ltd (2010) http://www.ltluk.com/lake_restorers.html

  34. Bergen SD, Bolton SM, Fridley JL (2001) Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 18:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Horsley, Witten, Hegemann, Inc (1991) Hydrogeologic investigation for groundwater discharge permit application. Report to the Town of Harwich, MA, 43 pp

    Google Scholar 

  36. K.V. Associates Inc. & IEP Inc (1991) Shallow pond diagnostic and feasibility study. Report to the Town of Barnstable, MA, 113 pp

    Google Scholar 

  37. Todd NJ, Todd J (1994) From eco-cities to living machines: principles of ecological design. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, 197 pp

    Google Scholar 

  38. Presidents Council on Sustainable Development (1996) Eco-industrial park workshop proceedings, 17–18 October, Cape Charles, VA, 141 pp

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yan J, Ma S (1991) The function of ecological engineering in environmental conservation with some case studies from China. In: Etnier C, Guterstam B (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on the ecological engineering for wastewater treatment, 24–28 March 1991, Stensund Folk College, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 80–94

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang LK, Pereira NC, Hung YT, Shammas NK (eds) (2009) Biological treatment processes. Humana, Totowa, NJ, 818 pp

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang LK, Shammas NK, Hung YT (eds) (2009) Advanced biological treatment processes. Humana, Totowa, NJ, 738 pp

    Google Scholar 

  42. Introduction to greenhouse-wetland treatment systems; http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty (2010)

  43. U.S. EPA (2002) Wastewater technology fact sheet: the living machine, EPA 832-F-02-025. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hung, YT., Hawumba, J.F., Wang, L.K. (2010). Living Machines. In: Wang, L., Tay, JH., Tay, S., Hung, YT. (eds) Environmental Bioengineering. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 11. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-031-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-031-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-493-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-031-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics