Skip to main content

Role of Ultrasound in Shoulder Dystocia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Injury
  • 1073 Accesses

Summary

Early recognition of maternal risk factors combined with early ultrasound are key to recognition of large infants. Using multiple ultrasound parameters, greater accuracy is achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Manning F. General principles and applications of ultrasound. Creasy R, Resnik R, eds. Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Fourth ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2004:315–356.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pritchard J, MacDonald P, eds. Techniques to evaluate fetal health. Williams Obstetrics (chapter 15). 15th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966:329–367.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pritchard J, MacDonald P, eds. Techniques to evaluate fetal health. Williams Obstetrics (chapter 15). 17th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1985:668.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dor P, Weiner H, Sofrin O, et al. Clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimates. J Reprod Med 2000;45:390–394.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chervenak F, Gabbe S. Obstetric ultrasound. Gabbe S, Niebyl J, Simpson J, eds. Obstetrics. Fourth ed. New York: Churchill Livingston; 2002:251–311.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mintz MC, Landon MB. Sonographic diagnosis of fetal growth disorders. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1988;31:44–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell S, Wilkin D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdominal circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:689–696.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadlock FP. Evaluation of fetal weight estimation procedures. :Deter J, Harrist S, Birnholz R, Hadlock J, eds. Quantitative Obstetrical Ultrasonography. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986;113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Modanlou HD, Komatsu G, Dorchester W, Freeman RK, Bosu SK. Large for gestational age neonates: Anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:417–421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ott WJ, Doyle S. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:201–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Depp R, Dooley SL, Socol ML. Diabetic macrosomia: Accuracy of third trimester ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:828–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Dooley SL, Vaisrub N, Socol ML, Depp R. Realtime ultrasound examinations of weight in fetuses of diabetic gravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:57–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crane JP, Kopta MM, Welt SI. Abnormal fetal growth patterns: Ultrasonic diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:205–209.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wladimiroff JW, Bloemsa CA, Wallenburg HCS. Ultrasonic diagnosis of the large for dates infant. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:285–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogata ES, Sabbagha R, Metzger BE, Phelps RL, Depp R, Freinkel N. Serial ultrasonography to assess evolving fetal macrosomia: Studies in 23 pregnant diabetic women. JAMA 1980;243:2405–2408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elliott JP, Garite TJ, Freeman RK, McQuown DS, Patel JM. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:159–161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Fearneyhough TC, Deter RL, Park SK, Rossavik IK. Use of femur length/abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus. Radiology 1985;154:503–508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Korndorffer FA, Kissling GE, Brown HL, Gabert HA. Recognition of the overgrown fetus in utero ponderal indices.Am J Perinatol 1987;4:86–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bracero LA, Baxi LV, Rey HR, Yeh MN. Use of ultrasound in anternatal diagnosis of large for gestational age infants in diabetic gravid patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:43–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murata Y, Martin CB. Growth of the biparietal diameter of the fetal head in diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;115:252–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Landon MB, Mintz MC, Gabbe SG. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: Predictor of the large for gestational age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:115–121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitzmiller JL. Macrosomia in infants of diabetic mothers: Characteristics, causes, prevention. Jovanovic L, Peterson cm, Fuhrman K, eds. Diabetes and Pregnancy, Teratology, Toxicity, and Treatment. New York: Praeger; 1986:121.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ott WJ. The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1988;15:237–263.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller JM Jr, Brown HL, Khawli OF, Pastorek JG II, Gabert HA. Ultrasonographic identification of the macrosomic fetus. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:577–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller JM Jr, Brown HL, Khawli OF, Pastorek JG II, Gabert HA. Ultrasonographic identification of the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:1110–1114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dorman KJ, Hansmann M, Redford DH, et al. Fetal weight estimation by realtime ultrasound measurement of biparietal and transverse trunk diameter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:652–655.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bochner CJ, Medearis AL, Williams J III, Castro L, Hobel CJ, Wade ME. Early third-trimester ultrasound screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:703–708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weights by ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:47–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deter RL, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP, Carpenter RJ. Fetal head and abdominal circumference: A critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound 1982;10:365–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:624–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Platt LD, Devore G, Golde S et al. The use of femoral soft tissue diameters in the prediction of macrosomic babies. Official Proceedings, AIUM Annual Meeting Denver 1982:97.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller JM, Korndorffer FA, Gabert HA. Fetal weight estimates in late pregnancy with emphasis on macrosomia. J Clin Ultrasound 1986;14:437–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Deter RL, Rossavik IK. A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:801–807.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH, et al. Femur length/abdominal circumference ratio: Poor predictor of macrosomic fetuses in diabetic mothers. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:141–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller JM Jr, Kissling GA, Brown HL, Gabert HA. stimated fetal weight: Applicability to small and large for gestational age fetus. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:95–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spinnato JA, Allen RD, Mendenhall HW. Birthweight prediction from remote ultrasound examination. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:893–897.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Manogura A. Early fetal growth rate helps predict macrosomia. OB-GYN News 2007;42:6,2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thurnau GR, Tamura RK, Sabbaha R, et al. A simple estimated fetal weight equation based on real time ultrasound measurements of fetuses less than thirty-four weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:557–561.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, et al. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal femur, and thigh circumference measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:410–414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Sonographic determination of fetal weights in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:441–447.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH, Kramer MS. Obstetrics consequences of postmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:334–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jimenez JM, Tyson JE, Reisch JS. Clinical measures of gestational age in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:438–441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Devore G, Berkowitz RL. The use of portable realtime ultrasound in the assessment of fetal weight during labor in the high risk patient. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982;25:203–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Patterson RM. Estimation of fetal weight during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:330–334.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Timor-Tritsch IE, Itskovich J, Brandes JM. Estimation of fetal weight by realtime sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:653–658.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Warsof SL, Wolf P, Coulehan J, Queenan JT. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:569–574.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson WJ, Soisson AP, Harlass FE. Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accuracy of ultrasound vs clinical examination. J Reprod Med 1988;33:369–373.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yarkoni S, Reece EA, Wan M, et al. Intrapartum fetal weight estimat5ion: A comparison of three formulae. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:707–711.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gabbe SG, Mestman JH, Freeman RK, et al. Management and outcome of class A diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;127:465–469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128:881–886.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Apuzzio J, Vintzileos A, Iffy L. Operative Obstetrics. Third ed. London: Taylor & Francis 2006;256.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A. Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing >/- 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:831–837.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jazayeri A, Heffron J, Phillips R, Spellacy W. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:523–526.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Miller R, Johnson B, Devine P. Sonographic “fetal asymmetry” predicts shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;189:545.

    Google Scholar 

  56. O’Sullivan JB, Mahan cm. Criteria for oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes 1964;13:278–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Doubilet PM, Greenes RA. Improved prediction of gestational age from fetal head measurements. Am J Radiol 1984;142:797–801.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:555–559.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:762–767.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mintz MC, Landon MB, Gabbe SG, et al. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:240–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ianniruberto A, Gibbons JM. Predicting fetal weight by ultrasound B scan cephalometry: An improved technique with disappointing results. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37:689–693.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Campbell WA, Vintzileos AM, Neckles S, et al. Use of the femur length to estimate fetal weight in premature infants: Preliminary results. J Ultrasound Med 1985;4:583–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Vintzileos AM, Neckles S. Campbell WA, et al. Ultrasound fetal thigh calf circumferences and gestational age independent fetal ratios in normal pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1985;4:287–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz O, Goldberg C. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1970;77:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. O’Brien GD, Queenan JT. Growth of the ultrasound fetal femur length during normal pregnancy. Part I. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:833–838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hadlock FP, Kent WR, Lloyd JL, et al. An evaluation of two methods for measuring fetal head and body circumference. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1:359–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hill LM, Breckle R, Wolfgram KR, et al. Evaluation of three methods for estimating fetal weight. J Clin Ultrasound 1986;14:171–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Deter RL, Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ. Evaluation of three methods for obtaining fetal weight estimates using dynamic image ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1981;9:421–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hohler CW, Kreinick CJ, Warford SHS, et al. A new method for prediction of fetal weight from ultrasound measurement of fetal abdominal circumference, thigh circumference and femur length. J Ultrasound Med 1983; Suppl 2:107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  70. McLean F, Usher R. Measurements of liveborn fetal malnutrition infants compared with similar gestation and with similar birthweight normal controls. Biol Neonate 1970;16:215–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Williams J III, Kirz DS, Worthen NJ, Oakes GK. Ultrasound prediction of shoulder dystocia. Soc Perinatol Obstet 1985;11:27.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gilby I, Williams M, Spellacy W. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. J Reprod Med 2000;45:936–938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Sokol R, Fchik L, Dombrowski M, Zadar I. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1489–1495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Weiss J, Shevell T, Cleary J, Malone F, Divine P. Macrosomia at birth: the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis in the obese diabetic population. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Songster G, Golde S. The prediction of fetal weight at term by preterm ultrasound. Soc Perinatol Obstet 1986;141:157.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Winn H, Holcomb W, Mazor M, et al. The utility of nonmuscular soft tissue thickness in the diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Procedeings Soc Perinatol Obstet 1989;286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

James A. O'Leary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Leary, J.A. (2009). Role of Ultrasound in Shoulder Dystocia. In: O'Leary, J. (eds) Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Injury. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-473-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-473-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-28-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-473-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics