Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Practice ((CCP))

  • 1024 Accesses

Abstract

During a busy morning office session, three women inquire about contraception, each with different goals and concerns. The first, 30 years old and married, has two young children. She and her husband think that they do not want more children, but not so certainly that they desire “permanent” birth control. She is looking for contraception that is safe, convenient, and reversible. The second woman, in her early 20s, is single and in a monogamous relationship. She has no children, but wants to have children someday. She also seeks a contraceptive method that is convenient and safe, but with the added benefit of protection against sexually transmitted infections. She suffers from dysmenorrhea. The third woman, in her late 30s and married, has firmly decided with her partner that they do not want any children. She is looking for a highly effective method to prevent pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart FH, et al. Contraceptive Technology. 18th revised ed. Ardent Media, Inc., New York; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Consumer Reports: Your comparative guide to contraceptives. 2005 (Accessed 11 June, 2005, at http://www.consumerreports.org/main/content/display_report.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=551091&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=333141#).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gallo M, Nanda K, Grimes DA, Schulz K. 20 mcg versus >20 mcg Estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(2):CD003989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holt VL, Scholes D, Wicklund KG, Cushing-Haugen KL. Body mass index, weight, and oral contraceptive failure risk. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(6):1492–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petitti DB. Clinical practice. Combination estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med 2003;349(15):1443–1450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346(26):2025–2032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Truitt ST, Fraser AB, Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Schulz KF. Combined hormonal versus non-hormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(2):CD003988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cromer BA, Stager M, Bonny A, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35(6):434–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choice of contraceptives. Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter 2004;2(24):55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. FDA Updates Labeling for Ortho Evra Contraceptive Patch, FDA News November 10, 2005 (Accessed 5 February, 2006 at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2005/NEW01262.html).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(1):CD003552.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Ott SM. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159(2):139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen JT. Noncontraceptive applications of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Curr Womens Health Rep 2002;2(6):417–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook L, Nanda K, Grimes D. Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(1):CD002031.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Grigorieva V, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(4):CD004860.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet 1998;352(9126):428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng L, Gulmezoglu AM, Oel CJ, Piaggio G, Ezcurra E, Look PF. Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(3):CD001324.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Funk S, Miller MM, Mishell DR Jr, et al. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel. Contraception 2005;71(5):319–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bascelli, L.M. (2008). Contraception. In: Clouse, A.L., Sherif, K. (eds) Women’s Health in Clinical Practice. Current Clinical Practice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-469-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-469-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-631-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-469-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics