Abstract
Neural prostheses have been used as treatment for a variety of neurological disorders, motivating engineers and scientists to pursue prostheses for presently incurable human diseases related to the nervous system. A retinal prosthesis is based on the principle of activating nerve cells using a device implanted on the retina. In an intraocular retinal prosthesis, the stimulation device is placed internal to the eye. Retinal prosthesis potentially targets the restoration of vision in persons affected by outer retinal degenerative diseases. The most common diseases are age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) (1). RP is a collective name for a number of genetic defects that result in photoreceptor loss. RP affects the rods (used in night vision) first and then the cones (used in ambient daylight levels). AMD results from abnormal aging of the retinal pigment epithelium and retina. Persons with AMD will start to have distorted vision and eventually, lose most of the vision in the central 30°. In both the diseases, the vision is impaired because of the damage to the photoreceptors that convert photons to neural signals. Postmortem evaluations of retina with RP or AMD have shown that a large number of cells remain healthy in the inner retina compared with the outer retina (2,3). The inner retina is made up of horizontal, bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells. Further, electrical stimulation of humans with RP and AMD results in the perception of light; so the neural cells can be activated, providing the hope of restoring lost vision in blind persons (4). A chronic implant with 16 electrode sites on the retina in three blind patients has yielded promising results (5). After being implanted with the prosthetic device, the patients were able to detect motion of a white bar (up, down, left, or right), detect a rectangular object, count objects, discriminate the orientation of two white bars in an “L” configuration regarding where the corner of the L was positioned, and discriminate between a dessert plate, a coffee cup, and a plastic knife.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Margalit E, Sadda SR. Retinal and optic nerve diseases. Artificial Organs 2003;27(11):963–974.
Humayun MS, Prince M, de Juan E Jr, et al. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40(1):143–148.
Kim S, Sadda S, Pearlman J, et al. Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2002;22(4):464–470.
Humayun MS, de Juan EJ, Weiland JD, et al. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 1999;39:2569–2576.
Humayun MS, Weiland J, Fujii G, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003;43(24):2573–2581.
Weiland JD, Yanai D, Mahadevappa M, et al. Visual task performance in Blind Humans with Retinal Prosthetic Implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;6:4172–4173.
Cha K, Horch K, Normann RA. Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: visual acuity in a pixelized vision system. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;20(4):439–449.
Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA, Boman DK. Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. J Opt Soc Am 1992;9(5):673–677.
Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA. Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system. Vision Res 1992;32(7):1367–1372.
Hayes JS, Yin JT, Piyathaisere DV, Weiland J, Humayun MS, Dagnelie G. Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. Artificial Organs 2003;27(11):1016–1028.
Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artifical vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 1974;183(123):440–444.
Veraart C, Wanet-Defalque MC, Gerard B, Vanlierde A, Delbeke J. Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis. Artificial Organs 2003;11:996–1004.
Peterman MC, Mehenti NZ, Bilbao KV, et al. The artificial synapse chip: a flexible retinal interface based on directed retinal cell growth and neurotransmitter stimulation. Artificial Organs 2003;27(11):975–985.
Zrenner E, Stett A, Weiss S, et al. Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? Vision Res 1999;39:2555–2567.
Eckmiller R. Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts. Ophthalmic Res 1997;29(5):281–289.
Fink W, Tarbell M, Weiland JD, Humayun MS. DORA: Digital Object Recognition Audio-Assistant for the visually impaired. ARVO. 2004.
Weiland JD, Cogan S, Humayun MS. Micro-Machined, Polyimide Stimulating Electrodes with Electroplated Iridium Oxide. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1999;1:13–16.
Weiland JD, Guven D, Magrhibi M, et al. Chronic implantation of an inactive poly (dimethyl siloxane) electrode array in dogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4210.
Xu X, Tai YC, Huang A, Ho C. IC-integrated Flexible Shear-tress Sensor Skin. Technical Digest, Solid State Sensor and actuator Workshop 2002;12(5):740–747.
Rose TL, Robblee LS. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37(11):1118–1120.
Weiland JD, Humayun MS, Anderson DJ. In Vitro Electrical Properties for Iridium Oxide vs. Titanium Nitride Stimulating Electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49(12):1574–1579.
Yuan F, Wiler JA, Wise KD, Anderson DJ. Micromachined Multichannel microelectrodes with titanium nitride sites. Proc 21st Int Conf IEEE EMBS 1999.
Nichols M. The challenges for hermetic encapsulation of implanted devices—a review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1994;22(1):39–67.
Wise KD, Anderson DJ, Hetke JF, Kipke DR, Najafi K. Wireless implantable microsystems: high-density electronic interfaces to the nervous system. Proc IEEE 2004;92(1):76–97.
Stieglitz T, Haberer W, Lau C, Goertz M. Development of an inductively coupled epiretinal visual prosthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol 2004;2:4178–4181.
Bashirullah R, Liu W, Ji Y, et al. A smart bi-directional telemetry unit for retinal prosthetic device. Proc Int Symp Circuits Syst 2003;5:5–8.
Kendir A, Liu W, Wang G, et al. An optimal design methodology for inductive power link with class-E amplifier. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I 52:857–866.
Sokal NO, Sokal AD. Class-E-A new class of high-efficiency tuned single-ended switching power amplifiers. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 1975;10:168–176.
Wang G, Liu W, Bashirullah R, et al. A closed loop transcutaneous power transfer system for implantable devices with enhanced stability. Proc IEEE Int Symp Circuits Syst 2004;4:17–20.
Wang G, Liu W, Sivaprakasam M, Kendir GA. Design and Analysis of an adaptive transcutaneous power telemetry for biomedical implants. IEEE Trans Circuits and Syst I;52:2109–2117.
Proakis J. Digital Communications (4th ed.), McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Sivaprakasam M, Liu W, Humayun MS, Weiland JD. A variable range bi-phasic current stimulus driver circuitry for an Implantable Retinal Prosthetic Device. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 2005;41:763–771.
Liu W, Humayun MS. Retinal prosthesis. IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf Dig Tech Pap 2004;218–219.
Zeng FG. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004;8(1):1–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, W., Sivaprakasam, M., Wang, G., Zhou, M., Weiland, J.D., Humayun, M.S. (2007). Development of an Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis to Benefit the Visually Impaired. In: Tombran-Tink, J., Barnstable, C.J., Rizzo, J.F. (eds) Visual Prosthesis and Ophthalmic Devices. Ophthalmology Research. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_5
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-16-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-449-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)