Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial-, Temporal-, and Contrast-Resolutions Obtainable With Retina Implants

  • Chapter
Visual Prosthesis and Ophthalmic Devices

Part of the book series: Ophthalmology Research ((OPHRES))

Abstract

In blind patients with degenerated photoreceptors a large percent of inner retinal neurons remain histologically intact and stay functionally alive (1). Without visual input, the retinal ganglion cells continue to transmit spontaneously generated action potentials through the optic tract to the visual centers. They can also be artificially activated by trains of short electrical impulses and such stimuli were shown to elicit localized perceptions of light, called phosphenes ((2)–(5)). This finding opened the possibility to restitute basic vision with retina implants by delivering electrical stimuli to the retina. Two main types of retina implants are currently developed using either sub- or epiretinal electrode arrays (see the other reviews in this Volume). Subretinal devices are implanted between the pigment epithelial layer and the outer layers of the retina so that they can activate the outer plexiform layer and bipolar cells (6). Epiretinal implants are placed from the vitreous side onto the ganglion cell and nerve fiber layer of the retina (7). Epiretinal implants can evoke action potentials in retinal ganglion cells and/or their axons (8). Finally, both types of implants send visual information in the form of spike patterns through the axons of retinal ganglion cells along the optic nerve to central visual structures. One crucial question remains regarding the type of neural responses evoked in the visual cortex by stimulation with retina implants. Are the spatial, temporal, and intensity resolutions obtainable with current technologies sufficient, in order to provide useful vision for discriminating objects in a static environment and to perceive motion in dynamic scenes of everyday life? Data for estimates of perceptual resolutions achievable with retina implants are rare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Santos A, Humayun M, de Juan E, et al. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthal 1997;115:511–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Humayun MS, de Juan E, Dagnelie G, Greenberg RJ, Probst RH, Phillips DH. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:40–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Humayun MS, de Juan E, Weiland JD, et al. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 1999;39:2569–2576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectrode retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003;43:2573–2581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rizzo JF, Wyatt JL. Prospects for a visual prosthesis. Neuroscientist 1997;3:251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 2002;295:1022–1025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckmiller R. Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts. Ophthalmic Res 1997;29:281–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckhorn R, Wilms M, Schanze T, et al. Visual resolution with retinal implants estimated from recordings in cat visual cortex. Vision Res 2006;46:2675–2690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orban GA. Neuronal Operations in the Visual Cortex. Springer, Berlin, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tovee MJ. An introduction to the visual system. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darian-Smith C, Gilbert CD. Topographic reorganization in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated. J Neurosci 1995;15:1631–1647.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bullier J, Hupe J-M, James AC, Girard P. The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. Progr Brain Res 2001;134:193–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Legge GE, Ahn SJ, Klitz TS, Luebker A. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Res 1997;37:1999–2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TG, Bullara L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37:996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilms M, Eger M, Schanze T, Eckhorn R. Visual resolution with epi-retinal electrical stimulation estimated from activation profiles in cat visual cortex. Visual Neurosci 2003;20:543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reitböck HJ. Fiber microelectrodes for electrophysiological recordings. J Neuosci Meth 1983;8:249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schanze T, Wilms M, Eger M, Hesse L, Eckhorn R. Activation zones in cat visual cortex evoked by electrical retina stimulation. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exper Ophthalmol 2002;240:947–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizzo JF, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;44:5355–5361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone JL, Barlow WE, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Milam AH. Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1634–1639.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilms M, Eckhorn R. Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats. BMC Neurosci 2005;6:50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rattay F, Resatz S. Effective electrode configuration for selective stimulation with inner eye prostheses. IEEE Trans. Biomed Engin 2004;51:1659–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA, Boman D. Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. J Optical Soc Am A 1992;9:673–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sommerhalder J, Oueghlani E, Bagnoud M, Leonards U, Safran A, Pellizone M. Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Res 2003;43:269–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Geruschat DR, Turano KA, Stahl JW. Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry Visual Sci 1998;75:525–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grinvald A, Lieke E, Frostig R, Hildesheim R. Cortical point spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 1994;14:2545–2568.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Waessle H, Boycott BB. Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. Physiol Rev 1991;71:447–480.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nirenberg S, Carcieri SM, Jacobs AL, Latham PE. Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature 2001;411:698–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eckhorn R, Pöpel B. Rigorous and extended application of information theory to the afferent visual system of the cat. II. Experimental results. Biol Cybernetics 1975;17:7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eckhorn R, Pöpel B. Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to the random motion of a spot stimulus. Vision Res 1981;21:435–443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rieke F, Warland DK, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Bialek W. Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eger M, Wilms M, Eckhorn R, Schanze T. Information transmission from a retina implant to the cat visual cortex. BioSystems 2005;79:133–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. König P, Engel AK, Singer W. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci 1996;19:130–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Agmon-Snir H, Segev I. Signal delay and input synchronization in passive dendritic structures. J Neurophysiol 1993;70:2066–2085.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson ME. A mechanism for neuronal gain control by descending pathways. Neural Computation 1994;6:242–254.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shapley RM, Victor JD. How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 1981;318:161–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Philips University, Marburg, Germany

    Reinhard Eckhorn

Authors
  1. Reinhard Eckhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

    Joyce Tombran-Tink PhD

  2. Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA

    Colin J. Barnstable DPhil (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director) (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director)

  3. Penn State Hershey Neuroscience Research Institute, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA

    Colin J. Barnstable DPhil (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director) (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director)

  4. Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA

    Colin J. Barnstable DPhil (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director) (Professor and Chair, Director and Co-Director)

  5. Ophthalmology Department, Harvard Medical School, Veteran’s Administration Hospital, Boston, MA

    Joseph F. Rizzo III MD (Director) (Director)

  6. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Veteran’s Administration Hospital, Boston, MA

    Joseph F. Rizzo III MD (Director) (Director)

  7. Center of Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Veteran’s Administration Hospital, Boston, MA

    Joseph F. Rizzo III MD (Director) (Director)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eckhorn, R. (2007). Spatial-, Temporal-, and Contrast-Resolutions Obtainable With Retina Implants. In: Tombran-Tink, J., Barnstable, C.J., Rizzo, J.F. (eds) Visual Prosthesis and Ophthalmic Devices. Ophthalmology Research. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-16-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-449-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation