Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains pp 145–184Cite as

The Use of Radiology in Mass Fatality Events

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  • Aitken, A. G., O. Flodmark, D. E. Newman, R. F. Kilcoyne, W. P. Shuman, and L. A. Mack 1985 Leg length determination by CT digital radiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 144(3):613–615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. J. and G. A. Foote 1998 Radiology in forensic identification: The Mt. Erebus disaster. Australas. Radiol. 42(4):321–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Forensic Radiographers 2004 Radiography facilities for temporary emergency mortuaries in the event of a mass fatality incident (unpublished paper). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, W. M. 1990 Forensic anthropology. In CAP Handbook for Postmortem Examination of Unidentified Remain; Developing Identification of Well Preserved, Decomposed, Burned, and Skeletonised Remains, M. F. Fierro, ed. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beningfield, S., H. Potgieter, A. Nicol, S. van As, G. Bowie, E. Hering, and E. Latti 2003 Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine. Emerg. Radiol. 10(1):23–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Binda, M., C. Cattaneo, A. Bogoni, P. Fattorini, and M. Grandi 1999 Identification of human skeletal remains: Forensic radiology vs. DNA. Radiol. Med. (Torino) 97(5):409–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisset, R. A., N. B. Thomas, I. W. Turnbull, and S. Lee 2002 Postmortem examinations using magnetic resonance imaging: Four-year review of a working service. BMJ 324(7351):1423–1424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brogdon, B. G. 1998a Radiological identification of individual remains. In Forensic Radiology, B. G.Brogdon, ed., pp. 149–187. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998b Radiological identification: Anthropological parameters. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 63–96. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogdon, B. G. and J. E. Lichtenstein 1998 Forensic radiology in historical perspective. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 13–34. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogdon, B. G., H. Vogel, and J. McDowell 2003 A Radiologic Atlas of Abuse, Torture and Inflicted Trauma. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, J. A., M. A. Hall-Craggs, V. R. Sams, and W. R. Lees 1996 Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348(9035):1139–1141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G. J. 1979 Diagnostic Radiography, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A. 1985 The identification of human remains. Int. Dent. J. 35(4):307–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, E. H. 1986 Pioneers and Early Years: A History of British Radiology. Colophon Ltd., Alderney, Chanel Islands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilvarquer, I., J. O. Katz, D. M. Glassman, T. J. Prihoda, and J. A. Cottone 1987 Comparative radiographic study of human and animal long bone patterns. J. Forensic Sci. 32(6):1645–1654.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. A. 1995 Intercondylar shelf angle: A new method to determine race from the distal femur. J. Forensic Sci. 40(5):777–782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culbert, W. L. and F. M. Law 1927 Identification by comparison of roentgenograms of nasal accessory sinuses and mastoid processes. JAMA (88):1632–1636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimond, B. 2002 Legal Aspects of Radiography and Radiology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, W. G. and N. Garland 1984 The history of the forensic applications in radiology. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 5(1):53–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emerton, D., I. Honey, A. McKenzie, P. Blake, D. Annett, C. Lawinski, and H. Cole 2005 Computed Radiography Systems for General Radiography (CR) Comparative Report, Edition 2, Report 05081. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel-Hills, P. 2006 Radiation protection in medical imaging. Radiography 12(2):153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. T., B. Knight, and D. K. Whittaker 1981 Forensic Radiology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, S. L. 1985 The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification. Int. Dent. J. 35(4):301–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, O. 1931 First Roentgen evidence. Radiology (17):789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. R. and L. B. Edelson 2002 The efficiency of an X-ray screening system at a mass disaster. J. Forensic Sci. 47(1):127–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. C. 1995 The new light: Discovery and introduction of the X-ray. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 165(5):1041–1045.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P. 2003 X-ray detectives turn images into evidence. Diagn. Imaging (Special edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greulich, W. W. and S. I. Pyle 1959 Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, W. D. and C. L. Fligner 1993 Confirmation of human identification using computerized tomography (CT). J. Forensic Sci. 38(3):708–712.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall-Edwards, J. 1908 On X-ray dermatitis and its prevention. Arch. Roentgen Ray (13):243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E. C. 1988 X-rays at the bar, 1896–1910. Invest. Radiol. 23(8):639–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansman, C. F. 1962 Appearance and fusion of ossification centers in the human skeleton. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 88:476–482.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harcke, H. T., J. A. Bifano, and K. K. Koeller 2002 Forensic radiology: Response to the Pentagon Attack on September 11, 2001. Radiology 223(1):7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. and B. F. Wall 2002 Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. National Radiological Protection Board-W4, Chilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebolt, C. F., M. W. Vannier, and R. H. Knapp 1990 Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 82(3):283–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerr, N. L., S. I. Pyle, and C. C. Francis 1962 Radiological Atlas of the Foot and Ankle. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • International X-ray Protection Committee 1928 International recommendations for X-ray and radium protection. Br. J. Radiol. (1):358–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackowski, C., E. Aghayev, M. Sonnenschein, R. Dirnhofer, and M. J. Thali 2006 Maximum intensity projection of cranial computed tomography data for dental identification. Int. J. Legal Med. 120(3):165–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D. 1980 Radiographic Photography and Imaging Processes. MTP Press Ltd., Lancaster, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. 1991 Identification of human remains lacking skull and teeth. A case report with some methodological considerations. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 12(2):93–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahana, T. and J. Hiss 1997 Identification of human remains: Forensic radiology. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 4(1):7–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahana, T., J. A. Ravioli, C. L. Urroz, and J. Hiss 1997 Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 18(1):40–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, N. J., R. E. Wood, and M. Goldstein 2002 Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: A retrospective study of 39 cases. J. Forensic Sci. 47(2):318–323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krogman, W. M. and M. Y. Iscan 1986 The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, 2nd ed. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurihara, Y., Y. Kurihara, K. Ohashi, A. Kitagawa, M. Miyasaka, E. Okamoto, and T. Ishikawa 1996 Radiologic evidence of sex differences: Is the patient a woman or a man? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 167(4):1037–1040.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawinski, C., A. McKenzie, H. Cole, P. Blake, and I. Honey 2005 Digital Detectors for General Radiography: A Comparative Technical Report 05078. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn 1899 Beitraz zur feststellung der identitat. Arch. Krim. Anthrop. (2):221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, J. E. 1998 Radiology in mass casualty situations. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 189–208. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maresh, M. M. 1943 Growth of major long bones in healthy children. Am. J. Dis. Child. 66:227–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlin, D. C., M. A. Clark, and S. M. Standish 1991 Identification of human remains by comparison of frontal sinus radiographs: A series of four cases. J. Forensic Sci. 36(6):1765–1772.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. and S. Bourne 1998 A Guide to Dental Radiography, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, W. F. 1980 Mineralization of the costal cartilages as an indicator of age: Preliminary observations. J. Forensic Sci. 25(4):736–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, S. et al. 2001 Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards. Pediatr. Res. (50):624–812.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, M. E., M. J. McCarthy, F. J. Wippold, J. E. Lichtenstein, and G. N. Wagner 1988 Radiologic evaluation of mass casualty victims: Lessons from the Gander, Newfoundland, accident. Radiology 168(1):229–233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. A., F. G. Spruill, and G. E. Gantner 1980 Radiologic identification of unknown human remains. J. Forensic Sci. 25(4):727–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. C., M. I. Okoye, D. Kiple, E. H. Kimmerle, and K. J. Reinhard 1999 Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging in post-mortem examinations: Elucidation and identification of cranial and facial fractures in victims of homicide utilizing 3-D computerized imaging reconstruction techniques. Int. J. Legal Med. 113(1):33–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar, P., M. D. Naidu, and K. Subramaniam 1999 Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification. Clin. Anat. 12(1):16–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navani, S., J. R. Shah, and P. S. Levy 1970 Determination of sex by costal cartilage calcification. Am, J, Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 108(4):771–774.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, P. J., T. L. Tytle, R. N. Jarman, and B. G. Eaton 1996 The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing. Radiology 200(2):541–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, S. I. and N. L. Hoerr 1955 Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Knee. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichs, K. and R. B. J. Dorion 1992 The use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the analysis of frontal sinus configuration. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. (25):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riepert, T., C. Rittner, D. Ulmcke, S. Ogbuihi, and F. Schweden 1995 Identification of an unknown corpse by means of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine. J. Forensic Sci. 40(1):126–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha Sdos, S., D. L. Ramos, and G. Cavalcanti Mde 2003 Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 17(1):24–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roentgen, W. C. 1895 A new kind of ray. Phys.-Med. Ges. (137):132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T. and S. Saunders 1994 Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of the human pelvis. J. Forensic Sci. 39(4):1047–1056.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutty, G. N. 2006 University of Leicester Announces World First Forensic Technique: A New Horizon for Mass Fatality Radiology, University of Leicester Press Release, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, I., M. E. Woesner, Leicester. R. A. Ferguson, and T. T. Noguchi 1972 A new application of forensic radiology: Identification of deceased from a single clavicle. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 115(3):619–622.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, L. and S. Black 2004 The Juvenile Skeleton. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. and E. D. Woolridge 1977 The use of panoramic radiographs for comparisons in cases of identification. J. Forensic Sci. 22(1):145–146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Radiographers 2005 Radiographers help identify London Bombing victims. Synergy September:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, L. D. and J. M. Suchey 1991 Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. J. Forensic Sci. 36(2):501–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, R. J., B. F. Wall, P. C. Shrimpton, et al. 2001 Frequency of Medical and Dental X-ray Examinations in the UK, 1997–98. National Radiological Protection Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thali, M. J. et al. 2000 Improved vision in forensic documentation: Forensic 3D/CAD-supported photogrammetry of bodily injury internal structures to provide more leads and stronger practical forensic evidence. Paper presented at the International Society of Optical Engineers: 3D Visualisation for Data Exploration and Decision Making.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thali, M. J., T. Markwalder, C. Jackowski, M. Sonnenschein, and R. Dirnhofer 2006 Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: Advantages and limitations. J. Forensic Sci. 51(1):113–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thali, M. J., K. Yen, W. Schweitzer, P. Vock, C. Boesch, C. Ozdoba, G. Schroth, M. Ith, M. Sonnenschein, T. Doernhoefer, E. Scheurer, T. Plattner, and R. Dirnhofer 2003a Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: Virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—A feasibility study. J. Forensic Sci. 48(2):386–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thali, M. J., K. Yen, W. Schweitzer, P. Vock, C. Ozdoba, and R. Dirnhofer 2003b Into the decomposed body-forensic digital autopsy using multislice-computed tomography. Forensic Sci. Int. 134(2–3):109–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonello, B. 1998 Mass Grave Investigations. Paper presented at the Imaging Science Oncologists, British Institute of Radiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, M. and G. C. Gleser 1952 Estimation of stature from long bones of American whites and Negroes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 10:463–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 1958 A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 16:79–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, S., D. Gokharman, M. Kacar, I. Tuncbilek, and U. Kosa 2005 Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J. Forensic Sci. 50(6):1310–1314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viner, M. D. 2001a Forensic investigation: The role of radiography. Eur. Radiol. Supplement to Volume 11(2):95.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2001b Forensic investigation: The role of radiography in forensic medicine. ISRRT Newsletter 37(2):4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2001c The radiographers role in forensic investigation. Hold Pusten: J. Norwegian Soc. Radiog. (9/2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, M. D., M. Cassidy, and V. Treu 1998 The Role of Radiography in a Disaster Investigation. Paper presented at the Imaging Science Oncolologists, British Institute of Radiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, M. D., W. Hoban, C. Rock, and M. T. Cassidy 2003 The Role of Radiography in the Investigation of Mass Incidents. Paper presented at the American Academy of Forensic Science 55th Scientific Meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, M. D., C. Rock, N. Hunt, G. Mackinnon, and A. W. Martin 2006 Forensic Radiography: Response to the London Suicide Bombings on 7th July 2005. Paper presented at the American Academy of Forensic Science 58th Scientific Meeting, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark D. Viner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, NY

    Bradley J. Adams PhD

  2. Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command Central Identification Laboratory, Hickam AFB, HI

    John E. Byrd PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viner, M.D. (2008). The Use of Radiology in Mass Fatality Events. In: Adams, B.J., Byrd, J.E. (eds) Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-316-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-316-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-769-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-316-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation