Skip to main content

Methodology in Commingling Analysis: An Historical Overview

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  • Adams, B. J. 1996 The Use of the Lincoln/Peterson Index for Quantification and Interpretation of Commingled Human Remains. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, B. J. and L. W. Konigsberg 2004 Estimation of the most likely number of individuals from commingled human skeletal remains. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 125(2):138–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. and J. B. M. Guy 1984 Optimal estimations of individuals in archaeological faunal assemblages: How minimal is the MNI? Archaeol. Oceania 19:41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. T. and R. W. Newman 1957 The use of bone weight for human identification. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 15(4):601–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E. and C. C. Gordon 1980 Individuation in forensic science study: Decapitation. J. Forensic Sci. 25(1):246–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E., C. C. Gordon, and L. St. Hoyme 1984 The case of the severed skull: Individuation in forensic anthropology. In Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, T. A. Rathbun and J. E. Buikstra, eds. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E. and D. H. Ubelaker (editors) 1994 Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Proceedings of a Seminar at The Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44). Spiral ed. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casteel, R. W. 1972 Some biases in the recovery of archaeological faunal remains. Proc. Prehistoric Soc. (38):382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casteel, R. W. 1977 Characterization of faunal assemblages and the minimum number of individuals determined from paired elements: Continuing problems in archaeology. J. Archaeol. Sci.(4):125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P. G. and R. M. Hagaman 1987 Minimum number of individuals and its alternatives: A probability theory perspective. OSSA 13:75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyman, C. E. 1965 Ultraviolet fluorescence as a means of skeletal identification. Am. Antiquity 31(1):109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, M. 1988 Variation of Trace Elements Within and Between Skeletons Using Multiple Sample Sites. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Paleopathology Association, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, M. and S. Chaudhuri 1990 Identification of Commingled Skeletal Remains Using Isotopic Strontium. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Science, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, B. A., C. E. Meloan, and M. Finnegan 1986 Reassembling scattered and mixed human bones by trace element ratios. J. Forensic Sci. 31(4):1455–1462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. P., P. Willey, and L. Snyder 1997 Human bone mineral densities and survival of bone elements: A contemporary sample. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, W. D. Haglund and M. H. Sorg, eds., pp. 295–317. CRC Press, BocaRaton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. S., B. H. Singer, and D. J. Perkins 1981 Quantification experiments on computer-simulated faunal collections. OSSA 8:79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinn, V. P. 1970 Forensic neutron activation analysis. In Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, T. D. Stewart, ed., pp. 25–35. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, W. D. and M. H. Sorg (editors) 1997 Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerley, E. R. 1972 Special observations in skeletal identification. J. Forensic Sci. 17(3):349–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krogman, W. M. 1962 The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCren, E. D. 1965 A note on the history of mark-recapture population estimates. J. Anim. Ecol. 34:453–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M. R. and B. K. Curran 1986 The use of the hip joint in the separation of commingled remains (abstract). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 69:231.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, M. R. and D. R. Hunt 1998 Morphometric segregation of commingled remains using the femoral head and acetabulum (abstract). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 26(Suppl):152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. 1993 Density-mediated attrition of bone assemblages: New insights. In From Bones to Behavior, J. Hudson, ed., pp. 324–341. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKern, T. W. 1958 The Use of Shortwave Ultraviolet Rays for the Segregation of Commingled Skeletal Remains. Environmental Protection Research and Developments Command, Quartermaster Research and Development Center Environmental Protection Research Division, Natick, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, D. M. and D. H. Ubelaker 2001 Differences in osteon banding between human and nonhuman bone. J. Forensic Sci. 46(2):220–222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, D. M. and D. H. Ubelaker 2003 Histologic examination of bone development in juvenile chimpanzees. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 122(2):127–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. A. and J. C. Rose 1993 The analysis of cremains: A case study involving the inappropriate disposal of mortuary remains. J. Forensic Sci. 38(1):98–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rösing, F. W. and E. Pischtschan 1995 Re-individualisation of commingled skeletal remains. In Advances in Forensic Sciences, B. Jacob and W. Bonte, eds. Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. and E. D. Folk 1965 Statistical assessment of commingled skeletal remains. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 32:423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. G. and W. D. Parama 1981 Frequencies of dental anomalies and their potential effect on determining MNI counts. Plains Anthropologist 26(91):51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. D. (editor) 1970 Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. D. 1979 Essentials of Forensic Anthropology. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield. IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. E. 1987 Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H. 1998 The evolving role of the microscope in forensic anthropology. In Forensic Osteology, Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, K. J. Reichs, ed., pp. 514–532. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H. 2001 Artificial radiocarbon as an indicator of recent origin of organic remains in forensic cases. J. Forensic Sci. 46(6):1285–1287.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H. 2002 Approaches to the study of commingling in human skeletal biology. In Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives, W. D. Haglund and M. H. Sorg, eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H. and M. M. Houck 2002 Using radiocarbon dating and paleontological extraction techniques in the analysis of a human skull in an unusual context. Forensic Sci. Comm. (4):4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H., J. M. Lowenstein, and D. G. Hood 2004 Use of solid-phase double-antibody radioimmunoassay to identify species from small skeletal fragments. J. Forensic Sci. 49(5):924–929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. H., D. C. Ward, V. S. Braz, and J. Stewart 2002 The use of SEM/EDS analysis to distinguish dental and osseos tissue from other materials. J. Forensic Sci. 47(5):940–943.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, L. and R. Nichol 1983 Estimation of the original number of individuals using estimators of the Krantz type. J. Field Archeol. (10):337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey, P., A. Galloway, and L. Snyder 1997 Bone mineral density and survival of elements and element portions in the bones of the Crow Creek Massacre victims. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 104:513–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winder, N. P. 1992 The removal estimator: A “probable numbers” statistic that requires no matching. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. (2):15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ubelaker, D.H. (2008). Methodology in Commingling Analysis: An Historical Overview. In: Adams, B.J., Byrd, J.E. (eds) Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-316-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-316-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-769-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-316-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics