Skip to main content

Valvular Heart Disease

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can accurately assess cardiac structure and physiology vital in evaluating regurgitant or stenotic valvular heart disease. Its versatility in providing comprehensive anatomical and functional assessment in valvular heart disease stems from its ability to qualitatively and quantitatively measure flow volumes, velocities, and flow fractions in any oblique cardiac plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arai AE, Epstein FH, Bove KE, Wolff SD. Visualization of aortic valve leaflets using black blood MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:771–777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Globits S, Higgins CB. Assessment of valvular heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1995;129:369–381.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krombach GA, Kuhl H, Bucker A, et al. Cine MR imaging of heart valve dysfunction with segmented true fast imaging with steady state free precession. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:59–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keegan J, Gatehouse PD, John AS, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN. Breath-hold signal-loss sequence for the qualitative assessment of flow disturbances in cardiovascular MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:496–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki JI, Caputo GR, Kondo C, Higgins CB. Cine MR imaging of valvular heart disease: display and imaging parameters affect the size of the signal void caused by valvular regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:723–727.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Crowe LA, et al. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol 2005;15:2172–2184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, Longmore DB. The applications of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurements. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:230–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM, et al. Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1988;167:425–430.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilner PJ, Manzara CC, Mohiaddin RH, et al. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1993;87:1239–1248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stahlberg F, Sondergaard L, Thomsen C, Henriksen O. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging-a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:13–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:631–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duerinckx AJ, Higgins CB. Valvular heart disease. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:613–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ: Valvular heart disease. In: Manning WJ, Pennell DJ, eds. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kilner PJ, Firmin DN, Rees RS, et al. Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping. Radiology 1991;178:229–235.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eichenberger AC, Jenni R, von Schulthess GK. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:971–977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004;90:893–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Henk CB, Grampp S, Koller J, et al. Elimination of errors caused by first-order aliasing in velocity encoded cine-MR measurements of postoperative jets after aortic coarctation: in vitro and in vivo validation. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1523–1531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1486–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sondergaard L, Hildebrandt P, Lindvig K, et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 1993;126:1156–1164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 1951;41:1–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hakki AH, Iskandrian AS, Bemis CE, et al. A simplified valve formula for the calculation of stenotic cardiac valve areas. Circulation 1981;63:1050–1055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ochiai K, Ishibashi Y, Shimada T, Murakami Y, Inoue S, Sano K. Subendocardial enhancement in gadolinium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1443–1446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Julsrud PR, Breen JF, Felmlee JP, Warnes CA, Connolly HM, Schaff HV. Coarctation of the aorta: collateral flow assessment with phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1735–1742.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Casolo GC, Zampa V, Rega L, et al. Evaluation of mitral stenosis by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1992;123:1252–1260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner S, Auffermann W, Buser P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and estimation of the severity of valvular regurgitation from the signal void on cine magnetic resonance images. Am Heart J 1989;118:760–767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishimura T, Yamada N, Itoh A, Miyatake K. Cine MR imaging in mitral regurgitation: comparison with color Doppler flow imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:721–724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baldy C, Douek P, Croisille P, Magnin IE, Revel D, Amiel M. Automated myocardial edge detection from breath-hold cine-MR images: evaluation of left ventricular volumes and mass. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:589–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hundley WG, Li HF, Willard JE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques. Circulation 1995;92:1151–1158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujita N, Chazouilleres AF, Hartiala JJ, et al. Quantification of mitral regurgitation by velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:951–958.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohnishi S, Fukui S, Kusuoka H, Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Kamada T. Assessment of valvular regurgitation using cine magnetic resonance imaging coupled with phase compensation technique: comparison with Doppler color flow mapping. Angiology 1992;43:913–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pflugfelder PW, Landzberg JS, Cassidy MM, et al. Comparison of cine MR imaging with Doppler echocardiography for the evaluation of aortic regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:729–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, Cassidy MM, Schiller NB, Higgins CB. Noninvasive evaluation of mitral regurgitation by analysis of left atrial signal loss in cine magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 1989;117:1113–1139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM, et al. Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1988;167:425–430.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Albers J, Nitsche T, Boese J, et al. Regurgitant jet evaluation using three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:96–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Edwards MB, Taylor KM, Shellock FG. Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:363–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Edwards MB, Draper ER, Hand JW, Taylor KM, Young IR. Mechanical testing of human cardiac tissue: some implications for MRI safety. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:835–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pomerantz BJ, Krock MD, Wollmuth JR, et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency: valve type as a determinant of systolic strain recovery. J Card Surg 2005;20:524–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al. ASSERT (Aortic Stentless vs Stented valve Assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators. Randomized comparison of stentless vs stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 2005;112:2696–2702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Lamb HJ, et al. MRI to evaluate left atrial and ventricular reverse remodeling after restrictive mitral annuloplasty in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2005;112(9 suppl):I437–I442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moustakidis P, Cupps BP, Pomerantz BJ, et al. Noninvasive, quantitative assessment of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Surg Res 2004;116:187–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Givehchian M, Kramer U, Miller S, et al. Aortic root remodeling: functional MRI as an accurate tool for complete follow-up. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;53:267–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kvitting JP, Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, Engvall J, Olin CL, Bolger AF. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, three-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1602–1607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kaminaga T, Takeshita T, Kimura I. Role of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of tumors in the cardiac region. Eur Radiol 2003;13(suppl 6):L1–L10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ariyarajah, V., Kwong, R.Y. (2008). Valvular Heart Disease. In: Kwong, R.Y. (eds) Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-306-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-306-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-673-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-306-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics