Skip to main content

Staging of Esophageal Cancer

  • Chapter
Endoscopic Oncology

Abstract

Esophageal carcinoma is the fifth most common gastrointestinal cancer, and the recent data suggests that it is rising in incidence faster than any other malignancy. Although esophageal carcinoma is generally felt to have a poor prognosis, this is largely owing to the heterogeneity of patients. As with any malignancy, the stage of the tumor predicts prognosis and determines treatment options. Stage of the tumor at diagnosis is the best predictor of long-term survival. Patients with early or localized disease may have excellent survival when treated surgically, whereas patients with more advanced disease may not. Multimodality chemoradio-therapy plus surgery may optimize survival. Patients with invasion into adjacent structures or distant metastatic disease are more appropriately treated with palliation alone. Every patient with esophageal carcinoma should be clinically staged to determine which treatment options are appropriate and to individualize management. Clinical stage can be accurately determined by a combination of modern staging techniques including computed tomography (CT), esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 2002. p 3–8, 91-103.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rybicki LA, et al. Refining esophageal cancer staging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125:1103–1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Esophagus. In Beahrs OH, Hansen DE, Hutter RVP, et al. (teds.): Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th ed. Philadelphia, JB: Lippincott, 1992:57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reed CE. Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma. Oncologist 1999; 4:95–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Enzinger PC, Ilson DH, Kelsen DP. Chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 1999; 26 Suppl 15:12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quint LE, Hepburn LM, Francis IR, et al. Incidence and distribution of distant metastases in newly diagnosed esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 76; 1995:1120–1125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Adenstein DJ, et al. N1 Esophageal carcinoma:The importance of staging and downstaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121:454–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Prise E, Etienne PL, Meunier B, et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery versus surgery for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1994;73:1779–1784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Apinop C, Puttisak P, Preecha N. A prospective study of combined therapy in esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1994;41:391–393.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bosset J-F, Gignoux M, Triboulet J-P, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone in squamous cell cancer of theesophagus. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:161–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Fitzgerald L, et al. A randomized phase in trial of preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery (CR-S)versus surgery alone (S) for localized resectable cancer of the esophagus. Prog Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21:130a (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, et al. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:305–313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Law S, Kwong D, Tung H, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Can J Gastroenterol 1998; 12 Suppl B:56B (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Medical progress: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2241–2252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nygaard K, Hagen S, Hansen HS, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal cancer: a randomized, multicenter study of preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer. World J Surg 1992;16:1104–1110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh T, Noonan N, Hollywood D, et al. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:462–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Refaely Y, Krasna MJ. Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2002; 82:729–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rice TW. Clinical Staging of Esophageal Carcinoma. Chest Surg Clin North Am 2000; 10:471–485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van Overhagen H, Becker CD. Diagnosis and Staging of Carcinoma of the Esophagus and gastro-esophageal Junction, and the Detection of Postoperative Recurrence, by Computed Tomography. In: Meyers MA. (ed.) Neoplasms of the Digestive Tract. Imaging, Staging, and Management. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chandawarkar RY, Kakegawa T, Fujita H, et al. Comparative analysis of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of nodal metastases in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 1996; 61:214–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases in patients with carcinoma: Comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:731–739.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dittler HJ, Pesarini AC, Siewert JR. Endoscopic classification of esophageal cancer: Correlation with the T stage. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38:662–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Caletti GC, Ferrari A, Fiorino S, et al. Staging of esophageal carcinoma by endoscopy. Endoscopy 1993; 25:2–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kienle P, Buhl K, Kuntz C, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography fro staging tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 2002;66:230–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhutani MS, Barde CJ, Markert RJ, et al. Length of esophageal cancer and degree of luminal stenosis during upper endoscopy predict T stage by endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 2002;34:457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: Comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991; 181:419–425.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Heintz A, Hohne U, Schweden F, et al. Preoperative detection of intrathoracic tumor spread of esophageal cancer: Endosonography versus computer tomography. Surg Endosc 1991; 5:75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP, et al. Endosonography and Computed Tomography of Esophageal Carcinoma: Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterol 1989;96:1478–1486.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of the literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995;5:537–547.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heidemann J, Schilling MK, Schmassman A, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma. Dig Surg 2000; 17:219–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vilmann P, Khattar S, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasound examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract using a curved array transducer:A preliminary report. Surg Endosc 1991; 5:79–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saunders HS, Wolfman NT, Ott DJ. Esophageal cancer. Radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:281–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kimmey MB, Martin RW, Haggitt RC, et al. Histologic correlates of gastrointestinal ultrasound images. Gastroenterology 1989;96:433–441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bolondi L, Casenova P, Santi V, et al. The sonographic appearance of the normal gastric wall: an in vivo study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986; 12:991–998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Adelstein DJ, Zuccaro G, et al. Role of clinically determined depth of tumor invasion in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125:1091–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, et al. A systemic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Gut 2001; 49:534–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Rice TW, et al. Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastases. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:442–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound and EUS guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:474–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Catalano MF, Alcocer E, Chak A, et al. Evaluation of metastatic celiac lymph nodes in patients with esophageal carcinoma: accuracy of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:352–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rice TW, Zuccaro G Jr., Adelstein DJ, et al. Esophageal carcinoma:Depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:787–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterol 1997; 112:1087–1095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mortensen MB, Pless T, Durup J, et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy 2001; 33:478–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton IA, Clain JE, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:751–757.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema M, Clain JE, et al. Impact of lymphnode staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterol 2003;125:1626–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reed CE, Mishra G, Sahai AV, et al. Esophageal cancer staging: improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodes. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:319–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Reed CE, et al. The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph nodemetastasis in patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:714–719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Meining A, Dittler HJ, Wolf A, et al. You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging. Gut 2002; 50:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fockens P, van den Brande JHM, van Dullemen HM, et al. Endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma: A learningcurve. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:58–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim LS, Koch J. Do we practice what we preach? Clinical decision making and utilization of endoscopic ultrasound for staging esophageal cancer. Am J Gastoenterol 1999; 94:1847–1852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Vilgrain V, Mompoint D, Palazzo L, et al. Staging of oesophageal carcinoma: Comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT. AJR 1990; 155:277–281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Catalano MF, Van Dam J, Sivak Jr MV. Malignant esophageal strictures: Staging accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41:535–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Dam J, Rice TW, Catalano MF, et al. High-grade malignant stricture is predictive of esophagel stage. Cancer 1993; 71:2910–2917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pfau PR, Ginsberg GG, Lew RJ, et al. Esophageal dilation for endosonographic evaluation of malignant esophageal strictures is safe and effective. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:2813–2815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kallemanis GE, Gupta PK, al-Kawas FH, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for staging esophageal cancer, with and without dilation,is clinically important and safe. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41:540–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Sahai AV, et al. Dilation of malignant esophageal stenosis to allow EUS guide fine-needle aspiration:safety and effect on patient managment. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:309–313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Menzel J, Hoepffner N, Nottberg H, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma: Miniprobe sonography versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound in a prospective histopathologically verified study. Endoscopy 1999; 31:329–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. McLoughlin RF, Cooperberg PL, Mathieson JR, et al. High resolution endoluminal ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:725–730.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hunerbein M, Ghadimi BM, Haensch W, et al. Transendoscopicultrasound of esophageal and gastric cancer using miniaturized ultrasound catheter probes. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:371–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Menzel J, Hoepffner N, Nottberg H, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma: Miniprobe sonography versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound in a prospective histopathologically verified study. Endoscopy 1999; 31:291–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Zuccaro G, Rice TW, Goldblum J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound cannot determine suitability for esophagectomy after aggressive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Isenberg G, Chak A, Canto MI, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in restaging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 158–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Laterza E, de Manzoni G, Guglielmi A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma after preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:1466–1469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Isenberg G, Chak A, Canto MI, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in restaging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chak A, Canto MI, Cooper GS, et al. Endosonographic assessment of multimodality therapy predicts survival of esophageal carcinoma patients. Cancer 2000; 88:1788–1795.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Penman ID, Williams DB, Sahai AV, et al. Ability of EUS with fine-needle aspiration to document nodal staging and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer:a case report. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:783–786.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kienle P, Buhl K, Kuntz C, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 2002;66:230–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hadzijahic N, Wallace MB, Hawes RH, et al. CT or EUS for the initial staging of esophageal cancer? A cost minimization analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:715–720.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Flanagan FL, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:417–424.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Rankin SC, Taylor H, Cook GJ, et al. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography in the pre-operative staging of esophageal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1998; 53:659–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Block MI, Patterson GA, Sundaresan RS, et al. Improvement in staging of esophageal cancer with the addition of positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:770–777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kole AC, Plukker JT, Nieweg OE, et al. Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastro-esophageal malignancy. Br J Cancer 1998; 78:521–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Meltzer CC, et al. Role of positron emission tomography in staging esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:765–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Luketich JD, Friedman DM, Weigel TL, et al. Evaluation of distant metastases in esophageal cancer: 100 consecutive positron emission tomography scans. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1133–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E, et al. Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:3202–3210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Krasna MJ, Reed CE, Jaklitsch MT, et al. Thoracoscopic staging of esophageal cancer: A prospective, multiinstitutional trial. Cancer and Leukemia Group B Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1337–1340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Finch MD, John TG, Garden OG, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasonography for staging gastro-esophageal cancer. Surgery 1997;121:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Luketich JD, Meehan M, Nguyen NT, et al. Minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:700–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Di Simone P, Mattioli S, Caletti GC, et al. Role of computed tomography,endoscopic ultrasound and bronchoscopy in the preoperative study of cancer of the thoracic esophagus. 1992; 53 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wallace MB, Nietert PJ, Earle C, et al. An analysis of multiple staging management strategies for carcinoma of the esophagus:Computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1026–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vollweiler, J., Zuccaro, G. (2006). Staging of Esophageal Cancer. In: Faigel, D.O., Kochman, M.L. (eds) Endoscopic Oncology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-172-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-172-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-532-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-172-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics