Abstract
This chapter reports long-term outcomes and the incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction with the use of a xenographic porcine jejunal submucosal graft as a closure material for the tunica albuginea after Peyronie’s plaque incision. There were 122 patients with penile curvature of 60° or greater who underwent plaque incision with closure of the tunical defect with this material. Surgical correction of the penile curvature was achieved in 90% of the patients. At a mean follow-up of 36 mo, 79% of the patients maintained their same degree of potency as preoperative. Xenographic porcine jejunal submucosal grafts for the coverage of cavernosal defects after Peyronie’s plaque incision allow satisfactory clinical results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lowsley OS, Gentile A. An operation for the cure of certain cases of plastic induration (Peyronie’ s disease) of the penis. J Urol 1947; 57: 552–593.
Mutfi GR, Aitchison M, Bramwell SP, et al. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1990; 144: 281–283.
Nooter RI, Bosch JL, Schroder FH. Peyronie’s disease and congenital penile curvature: long-term results of operative treatment with the plication procedure. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 497–500.
Nesbit RM. Congenital curvature of the phallus: report of the three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol 1965; 93: 230–234.
Coughlin PWF, Carson CC III, Paulson DF. Surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease: the Nesbit procedure. J Urol 1984; 131: 282–285.
Gholami S, Lue T. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol 2002; 167: 2066–2069.
Devine CJ, Horton CE. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with dermal graft. J Urol 1974; 111: 44–49.
Das S. Peyronie’s disease: excision and autografting with tunica vaginalis. J Urol 1980; 124: 818–819.
Fallon B. Cadaver dura mater graft for correction of penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease. Urology 1990; 35: 127–129.
Lowe DH, Ho PC, Parsons CL. Surgical treatments of Peyronie’s disease with Dacron graft. Urology 1982; 19: 609–612.
Gelbard MK, Hayden B. Expanding contractures of the tunica albuginea due to Peyronie’s disease with temporalis fascia free grafts. J Urol 1991; 145: 772–776.
El-Sakka AI, Rashwan HM, Lue TF. Venous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part II. Outcome analysis. J Urol 1998; 160: 2050–2053.
Hellstrom WJG, Reddy S. Application of pericardial graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2000; 163: 1445–1447.
Knoll LD. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosal graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Urology 2001; 57: 753–757.
Levine LA, Estrada CR. Human cadaveric pericardial graft for the surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2003; 170: 2359–2362.
Usta MFB, Valacqua TJ, Sambria J, et al. Patient and partner satisfaction and long term results after surgical treatment for Peyronie’s disease. Urology 2003; 62: 105–109.
Chun JL, McGregor A, Krishnan R, et al. A comparison of dermal and cadaveric pericardial grafts in the modified Horton-Devine procedure for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2001; 166: 185–188.
Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease by incomplete circumferential incision of the tunica albuginea and plaque with bovine pericardium graft. Urology 2002; 59: 570–574.
Hodde JP, Badylak SF, Brightman AO. Glycosaminoglycan content of small intestinal submucosa: a bioscaffold for tissue replacement. Tissue Eng 1996; 2: 209–217.
Voytik-Harbin SL, Brightman AO, Kraine M. Identification of extractable growth factors from small intestinal submucosa. J Cell Biol 1997; 67: 478–491.
McPherson TB, Badylak SF. Characterization of fibronectin derived from porcine small intestinal sub-mucosa. Tissue Eng 1998; 4: 75–83.
Prevel LD, Eppley BL, Summerlin DJ, et al. Utilization for repair of rodent abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35: 374–380.
Lantz GC, Badylak SF, Hiles MC, et al. Small intestinal submucosa as a vascular graft: a review. J Invest Surg 1993; 6: 297–310.
Badylak SF. Small intestinal submucosal (SIS): a biomaterial conductive to smart tissue remodeling. In: Tissue Engineering Current Perspectives (Bell E, ed.). Burkhauser, Cambridge, UK, 1993, pp. 179–189.
Badylak SF, Coffey AC, Lantz GC, et al. Comparison of the resistance to infection of intestinal submucosal arterial autographs vs polytetrafluoroethylene arterial prostheses in a dog model. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19: 465–472.
Knapp PM, Lingerman IE, Seigel YI, et al. Biocompatibility of small intestinal submucosal in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol 1994; 8: 125–130.
Weidemann A, Otto M. Small intestinal submucosa for pubourethral sling suspension for the treatment of stress incontinence: first histopathological results in humans. J Urol 2004; 172: 215–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knoll, L.D. (2007). Use of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosal Graft in the Surgical Management of Peyronie’s Disease. In: Levine, L.A. (eds) Peyronie’S Disease. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-161-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-161-1_19
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-614-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-161-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)