Abstract
Despite an unceasing stream of publications extolling the value of postmortem examination (1–12), the hospital autopsy rate continues to decline. Estimates, published in the 199Os, of the overall autopsy rate in the United States are as low as 5%, with the rate in academic institutions estimated at 11% (13,14). Several factors contribute to this. One is the notion that the autopsy will not reveal information above and beyond that gained from current sophisticated imaging studies. Another is the clinicians’ concern about resultant litigation. A more fundamental reason, however, is the lack of vigoron the part of the clinician to seek permission from the family (15). The physician attending the death may be too quickly distracted by other competing concerns and responsibilities, or more likely, (s)he is unfamiliar with the family of the deceased. This latter situation is frequent in teaching hospitals, where a house officer with no prior contact with the patient attends the death and feels uncomfortable in requesting permission for autopsy. These obstacles notwithstanding, it this author’s opinion that any academic teaching hospital must make a genuine and persistent effort to achieve a hospital autopsy rate of at least 25%.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cardoso MP, Bourguignon DC, Gomes MM, Saldiva PH, Pereira CR, Troster EJ. Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in SaoPaulo, Brazil. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7(5):423–427.
Lardenoye JH, Kastelijn KW, van Esch L, Vrancken Peeters MP, Breslau Pl. [Evaluation of the rate of autopsyand rate of disparity between autopsy results and clinical cause of deathina surgical ward, with the emphasison necrological review]. Ned TIjdscbr Geneeskd 2005;149:1579–1583.
Ferguson RP, Burkhardt L, Hennawi G, Puthumana L. Consecutive autopsies on an internal medicine service. South Moo J 2004;97:335–337.
Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Henin D, Gibert C, Chastre J. Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit:a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:389–392.
Gibson TN, Shirley SE, Escoffery CT, Reid M. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:980–985.
Killeen OG, Burke C, Devaney D, Clarke TA. The value of the perinatal and neonatal autopsy. Ir Moo J 2004;97:241–244.
Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL. Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit:still useful? Intensive Care Med 2004;30:2080–2085.
Newton D, Coffin CM, Clark EB, Lowichik A. How the pediatric autopsy yields valuable information in a vertically integrated health care system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1239–1246.
Shojania KG, Burton BC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:2849–2856.
Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 2003;7:R129–132.
Ornelas-Aguirre JM, Vazquez-Camacho O, Gonzalez-Lopez L, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Gamez.-Nava JI. Concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis in the autopsy: results of a 100year study in a tertiary care center. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003;7:223–230.
Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of the autopsy. Lancet 2007;369:1471–1480.
Hasson J, Schneidermann H. Autopsy training programs. To right a wrong. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:289–291.
Welsh T, Kaplann J. The role of postmortem examination in medical education. Mayo Clinic Proc 1998;73:802–805.
Burton EC, Phillips RS, Covinsky KE, Sands LPL, Goldman L, Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr., Landefeld CS. The relation of autopsy rate to physicians’ beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy. Am J Med 2004;117;255–261.
College of American Pathologists. Autopsy Pathology Checklist ¢ 2006 College of American Pathologists.
Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Am J Clin Path 2006;126:337–340.
Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical andautopsy pathology. Am J Surg Path 2006;30:1469–1471.
Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Hum Path 2006;37:985–988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waters, B.L. (2009). Ensuring Quality in the Hospital Autopsy. In: Waters, B.L. (eds) Handbook of Autopsy Practice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_1
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-841-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-127-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)