Skip to main content

Ensuring Quality in the Hospital Autopsy

  • Chapter
Handbook of Autopsy Practice

Abstract

Despite an unceasing stream of publications extolling the value of postmortem examination (112), the hospital autopsy rate continues to decline. Estimates, published in the 199Os, of the overall autopsy rate in the United States are as low as 5%, with the rate in academic institutions estimated at 11% (13,14). Several factors contribute to this. One is the notion that the autopsy will not reveal information above and beyond that gained from current sophisticated imaging studies. Another is the clinicians’ concern about resultant litigation. A more fundamental reason, however, is the lack of vigoron the part of the clinician to seek permission from the family (15). The physician attending the death may be too quickly distracted by other competing concerns and responsibilities, or more likely, (s)he is unfamiliar with the family of the deceased. This latter situation is frequent in teaching hospitals, where a house officer with no prior contact with the patient attends the death and feels uncomfortable in requesting permission for autopsy. These obstacles notwithstanding, it this author’s opinion that any academic teaching hospital must make a genuine and persistent effort to achieve a hospital autopsy rate of at least 25%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cardoso MP, Bourguignon DC, Gomes MM, Saldiva PH, Pereira CR, Troster EJ. Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in SaoPaulo, Brazil. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7(5):423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lardenoye JH, Kastelijn KW, van Esch L, Vrancken Peeters MP, Breslau Pl. [Evaluation of the rate of autopsyand rate of disparity between autopsy results and clinical cause of deathina surgical ward, with the emphasison necrological review]. Ned TIjdscbr Geneeskd 2005;149:1579–1583.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson RP, Burkhardt L, Hennawi G, Puthumana L. Consecutive autopsies on an internal medicine service. South Moo J 2004;97:335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Henin D, Gibert C, Chastre J. Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit:a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:389–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson TN, Shirley SE, Escoffery CT, Reid M. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:980–985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Killeen OG, Burke C, Devaney D, Clarke TA. The value of the perinatal and neonatal autopsy. Ir Moo J 2004;97:241–244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL. Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit:still useful? Intensive Care Med 2004;30:2080–2085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton D, Coffin CM, Clark EB, Lowichik A. How the pediatric autopsy yields valuable information in a vertically integrated health care system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1239–1246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shojania KG, Burton BC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:2849–2856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 2003;7:R129–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ornelas-Aguirre JM, Vazquez-Camacho O, Gonzalez-Lopez L, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Gamez.-Nava JI. Concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis in the autopsy: results of a 100year study in a tertiary care center. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003;7:223–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of the autopsy. Lancet 2007;369:1471–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasson J, Schneidermann H. Autopsy training programs. To right a wrong. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:289–291.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Welsh T, Kaplann J. The role of postmortem examination in medical education. Mayo Clinic Proc 1998;73:802–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burton EC, Phillips RS, Covinsky KE, Sands LPL, Goldman L, Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr., Landefeld CS. The relation of autopsy rate to physicians’ beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy. Am J Med 2004;117;255–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. College of American Pathologists. Autopsy Pathology Checklist ¢ 2006 College of American Pathologists.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Am J Clin Path 2006;126:337–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical andautopsy pathology. Am J Surg Path 2006;30:1469–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper, K. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Hum Path 2006;37:985–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waters, B.L. (2009). Ensuring Quality in the Hospital Autopsy. In: Waters, B.L. (eds) Handbook of Autopsy Practice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-841-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-127-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics