Skip to main content

Integrating Evidence Into Clinical Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Evidence-Based Endocrinology

Part of the book series: Contemporary Endocrinology ((COE))

Abstract

In busy clinical practice, diagnosis is our daily bread. All day, every day, we confront patients’ predicaments in which both of us want to know what is the matter. Many diagnostic tests are already available to help us, with more being developed all the time. Increasingly, diagnostic tests are undergoing rigorous evaluations of their accuracy and usefulness, with the results published as clinical care research (1). How can the results of this clinical care research be incorporated into our diagnostic decision making? This chapter addresses this topic, by starting with some illustrative cases, considering different modes of diagnostic thought, and then examining how evidence can be integrated into clinical diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knottnerus JA, ed. The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis, BMJ Books, London, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman GR, Brooks LR. The non-analytical basis of clinical reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ 1997;2:173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox K. Perceiving clinical evidence. Med Educ 2002;36:1189–1195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman GM. The tacit dimension of clinical judgment. Yale J Biol Med 1990;63:47–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters RM. The role of intuitive thinking in the diagnostic process. Arch Fam Med 1995;4:939–941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Round A. Introduction to clinical reasoning. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:109–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassirer JP. Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:893–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Cooke AD. Judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 1998;49:447–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter K. “Don’t think zebras”: uncertainty, interpretation, and the place of paradox in clinical education. Theor Med 1996;17:225–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangrulkar RS, Saint S, Chu S, Tierney LM. What is the role of the clinical pearl? Am J Med 2002;113:617–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI. Learning Clinical Reasoning. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barondess JA, Carpenter CCJ, eds. Differential Diagnosis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glass RD. Diagnosis: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med 1994;69:883–885.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eva KW, Neville AJ, Norman GR. Exploring the etiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Acad Med 1998;73:S1–S5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodstein LP, Andersen HB, Olsen SE. Tasks, Errors, and Mental Models. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wickens CD, Gordon SE, Liu Y, eds. An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. Addison-Wesley-Longman, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elstein AS, Shulman L, Sprafka S. Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dawson NV, Arkes HR. Systematic errors in medical decision making: judgment limitations. J Gen Intern Med 1987;2:183–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HPA. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implications. Acad Med 1990;65:611–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Custers EJ, Regehr G, Norman GR. Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: a review. Acad Med 1996:71:S55–S61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammond KR. How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment. Med Decis Making 1996;16:281–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgs J, Jones M, eds. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cox K. Doctor and Patient: Exploring Clinical Thinking. UNSW Press, Sydney, Australia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Norman GR. The epistemology of clinical reasoning: perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience. Acad Med 2000;75:S127–S136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bornstein BH, Emler AC. Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors’ decision-making biases. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:97–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Redelmeier DA, Ferris LE, Tu JV, Hux JE, Schull MJ. Problems for clinical judgment: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. CMAJ 2001;164:358–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Arocha JF. Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision making. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:52–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Montori VM. Evidence-based diagnosis in endocrinology. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2002;31:567–581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Irwig L, Tosteson ANA, Gatsonis C, et al. Guidelines for meta-analysis evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:667–676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analyses in Context. BMJ Books, London, UK, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Summarizing studies of diagnostic test performance. Clin Chem 2003;49:1783–1784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guyatt GH, Rennie DR, eds. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. AMA Press, Chicago, IL, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB, eds. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 3/e. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Richardson WS. Evidence-based diagnosis: More is needed [EBM Note] Evidence-Based Medicine 1997;v:70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sackett DL. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. JAMA 1992;267:2638–2644.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Simel DL, Rennie DR. The clinical examination-an agenda to make if more rational [Editorial]. JAMA 1997;277:572–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Crooks J, Murray IPC, Wayne EJ. Statistical methods applied to the clinical diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis. Q J Med 1959;28:211–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Nishikawa J, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XV. How to use an article about disease probability for differential diagnosis. JAMA 1999;281:1214–1219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Richardson WS. Where do pretest probabilities come from? Evidence Based Medicine 1999;4:67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Polashenski WA, Wilson MC. A new arrival-evidence about differential diagnosis. ACP J Club 2000;133:A11–A12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson WS. Five uneasy pieces about pretest probability. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:882–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Attia J, Margetts P, Guyatt G. Diagnosis of thyroid disease in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:658–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dolan JG, Wittlin SD. Hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. In: Black ER, Bordley DR, Tape TG, Panzer RJ, eds. Diagnostic Strategies for Common Medical Problems, 2nd edition. ACP, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, pp. 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 1980;302:1109–1117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gross R. Making Medical Decisions: An Approach to Clinical Decision Making for Practicing Physicians. ACP, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Williams JW Jr, Moyer VA, Naylor CD, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XXIV. How to use an article on the clinical manifestations of disease. JAMA 2000;284:869–875.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1994;271:389–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994;271:59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. JAMA 1994;272:1367–1371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. JAMA 1995;274:1800–1804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XXII. How to use articles about clinical decision rules. JAMA 2000;284:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Levine M, Walter S, Lee HN, Haines T, Holbrook A, Moyer V, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. JAMA 1994;271:1615–1619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson WS, Tugwell P, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. JAMA 1994;272:234–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1993;270:2598–2601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994;271:59–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Richardson WS, Detsky AS, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1995;273:1292–1295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Richardson WS, Detsky AS, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1995;273:1610–1613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O’Brien BJ, Levine M, Heyland DK, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1997;277:1552–1557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. O’Brien BJ, Heyland DK, Richardson WS, Levine M, Drummond MF, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1997;277:1802–1806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. JAMA 1999;281:2029–2034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Naylor CD, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. X. How to use an article reporting variations in the outcomes of health services. JAMA 1996;275:554–558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Naylor CD, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XI. How to use an article about a clinical utilization review. JAMA 1996;275:1435–1439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Randolph AG, Haynes RB, Wyatt JC, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XVIII. How to use an article evaluating the clinical impact of a computer-based clinical decision support system. JAMA 1999;282:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? JAMA 1995;274:570–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. What are the recommendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? JAMA 1995;274:1630–1632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, W.S. (2006). Integrating Evidence Into Clinical Diagnosis. In: Montori, V.M. (eds) Evidence-Based Endocrinology. Contemporary Endocrinology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-008-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-008-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-579-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-008-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics