Skip to main content

Intravascular Filters and Stents

  • Chapter
The Bionic Human

Abstract

In 1953, Sven Ivar Seldinger solved the problem of simple vascular access and opened the door to the current era of endovascular diagnostics and therapeutics (1). Twenty years later, Greenfield introduced the pulmonary embolectomy catheter and vena caval filter for treatment of pulmonary embolism (2). The introduction of intravascular stents by Palmaz in 1985 marked the most recent advance in the progress toward less invasive treatment for vascular disease (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fogarty TJ, Biswas A. Evolution of endovascular therapy: diagnostics and therapeutics. In: White RA, Fogarty TJ, eds. Peripheral endovascular interventions. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greenfield LJ, Kimmell GO, McCurdy WC. Transvenous removal of pulmonary emboli by vacuum-cup catheter technique. J Surg Res 1969;9:347–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenfield LJ, Zocco J, Wilk J, Schroeder T, Elkins R. Clinical experience with the Kim-Ray Greenfield vena caval filter. Ann Surg 1977;185:692–698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenfield LJ, Peyton R, Crute S, Barnes RW. Greenfield vena caval filter experience: Late results in 156 patients. Arch Surg 1981;116:1451–1455.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC, Cho KJ, et al. Extended evaluation of the titanium Greenfield vena caval filter. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:458–465.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, Elkins R. A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 1973;73:599–606.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crochet DP, Stora O, Ferry D, et al. Vena Tech-LGM filter: long-term results of a prospective study. Radiology 1993;188:857–860.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crochet DP, Brunel P, Trogrlic S, Grossetete R, Auget JL, Dary C. Long-term follow-up of vena tech-LGM filter: predictors and frequency of caval occlusion. JVIR 1999;10:137–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown R. Simon Nitinol filter clincal study. 1991. Anonymous. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim D, Grassi CJ, Simon M, Kleshinski S, Siegel J, Porter DH. Simon Nitinol filter clinical trial: Final results. RSNA 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Firkin A, Walters N, Thomson K, Atkinson N. Inferior vena cava “bird’s nest” filters-2-year follow-up. Aust Radiol 1992;36:286–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roehm J, Gianturco C, Barth M, Wright K. Percutaneous transcatheter filter for the inferior vena cava: A new device for treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism. Radiology 1984;150:255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC, Saluja A. Clinical results of Greenfield filter use in patients with cancer. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:145–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC. Suprarenal filter placement. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:432–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenfield LJ, Cho KJ, Proctor MC, Sobel M, Shah S, Wingo J. Late results of suprarenal Greenfield vena cava filter placement. Arch Surg 1992;127:969–973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC. Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter. Cardiovasc Surg 1995;3:199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonn J, Cho KJ, Cipolle M, et al. Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:573–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deithrich EB. Endovascular suite design. In White RA, Fogarty TJ, eds. Peripheral endovascular interventions. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnston KW. Value and limitations of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stents, and lytic agents for aortoiliac disease. In: Veith FJ, ed. Current critical problems in vascular surgery (vol. 7). St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1996, pp. 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Back MR, White RA. Biomaterials: considerations for endovascular devices. In: White RA, Fogarty TJ, eds. Peripheral endovascular interventions. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Semba CP, Dake MD. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: Aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Radiology 1994;191:487–494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cavaye DM, Diethrich EB, Santiago OJ, Kopchok GE, Laas TE, White RA. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: an essential component of angioplasty assessment and vascular stent deployment. Int Angiol 1993;12(3):214–220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Phipp LH, Scott JA, Kessel D, Robertson I. Subclavian stents and stent-grafts: cause for concern? J Endovasc Surg 1999;6:223–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall LD, Murray JD, Boswell GE. Venous stent placement as an adjunct to the staged, multimodal treatment of Paget-Schroetter syndrome. JVIR 1995;6:565–570.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nazarian GK, Bjarnason H, Dietz CA, Bernadas CA, Hunter DW. Iliofemoral venous stenosis: effectiveness of treatment with metallic endovascular stents. Radiology 1996;200:193–199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fletcher WS, Lakin PC, Pommier RF, Wilmarth T. Results of treatment of inferior vena cava syndrome with expandable metallic stents. Arch Surg 1998;133:935–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neglen P, Raju S. Balloon dilation and stenting of chronic iliac vein obstruction: technical aspects and early clincal outcome. J Endovasc Ther 2000;7:79–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller JH, McBride K, Little F, Price A. Malignant superior vena cava obstruction: stent placement via the subclavian route. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000;23:155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergan JJ, Thorpe PE. Endovenous Surgery. In White RA, Fogarty TJ, eds. Peripheral endovascular interventions. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 515–529.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andrews RT, Geschwind JFH, Savader SJ, Venbrux AC. Entrapment of J-tip guidewires by Venatech and stainless steel Greenfield vena cava filters during central venous catheter placement: percutaneous management in four patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998;21:424–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dardik A, Campbell KA, Yeo CJ, Lipsett PA. Vena cava filter ensnarement and delayed migration: an unusual series of cases. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:869–874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Latham JA, Irvine A. Infection of endovascular stents: an uncommon but important complication. Cardiovasc Surg 1999;7:179–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenfield, L.J., Proctor, M.C. (2006). Intravascular Filters and Stents. In: Johnson, F.E., Virgo, K.S., Lairmore, T.C., Audisio, R.A. (eds) The Bionic Human. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics