Skip to main content

European Counterpoint to Chapter 16

  • Chapter
The Bionic Human

Abstract

Stimulation of tissues with electricity for medical purposes is not a new idea. Two thousand years ago, Roman physicians recommended the electrical discharge of the torpedo fish for the treatment of headache and gout. Interest in electrical methods of stimulating hearing began when Volta discovered the electrolytic cell in 1790. He inserted metal rods into his own ears and connected them to a circuit that produced approximately 50 volts. When the circuit was completed, he experienced a sensation which he described as a blow to the head; it was followed a few moments later by a noise that sounded like the boiling of a viscous liquid. Volta’s unpleasant experience probably discouraged others. Few attempts to investigate the phenomenon were carried out over the next 50 years, but the sensation was always momentary and lacked tonal quality. Nevertheless, it was apparent that a sense of hearing occurred with an electrical stimulation of the inner ear. A great deal of experimentation was needed to determine how this could be used to restore hearing. Many questions are still unanswered. What is the best way to “code” the complexities of sound into electrical pulse? Does it matter where the electrodes are placed inside the inner ear? What are the effects of long-term electrical inner ear stimulation on the hearing nerves and brain?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Djourno A, Eyries C. Prothèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensoriel à l’aide d’un bobinage inclus à demeure. Presse médicale 1957;35:14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niparko JK, Wilson BS. History of cochlear implant. In: Niparko JK, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, McConkey-Robbins A, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark GM. Historical Perspectives. In: Clark GM, Cowan RS, Dowell RC, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children: advances. San Diego, CA: Singular, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Cochlear implantation: demand, costs and utility. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:245–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Telian SA, El-Kashlan HK, Arts HA. Minimizing wound complications in cochlear implant surgery. Am J Otol 1999;20(3):331–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson WPR, Harrison HC, Prowse C. A new incision for placement of cochlear implants. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:821–825.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA, Stroschein M. Medical or surgical complications related to the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;97(suppl 135):8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris JP, Cueva RA. Flap design for cochlear implantation: avoidance of a potential complication. Laryngoscope 1987;97(6):755–757.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark GM, Pyman BC, Bailey QR. The surgery for multiple-electrode cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1979;93:215–223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parkins W, Metzinger SE, Marks HW, Lyons GD. Management of late extrusions of cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1998;19:768–773.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishida K, Shinkawa A, Sakai M, Tamura Y, Naito A. Cause and repair of flap necrosis over cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1997;18:472–474.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100(9 Pt 1):708–711.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA, Strochein M. Medical or surgical complications related to the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;97:8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kempf HG, Johann K, Weber PB, Lenarz T. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in children. Am J Otol 1997;18:S62–S63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Webb RL, Lehnardt E, Clark GM, Laszig R, Pyman BC, Franz BKHG. Surgical complications with the cochlear multiple-channel intracochlear Implant: experience at Hanover and Melbourne. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:131v136.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hampton SM, Toner JG. Belfast Cochlear Implant Center; the surgical results of the first 100 implants. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2000;121:9–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyamoto RT, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Wagner-Escobar M. Aural rehabilitation. In: Hughes G, Pensak, eds. Clinical Otology (2nd ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997:395–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saliba, I., Fraysse, B. (2006). European Counterpoint to Chapter 16. In: Johnson, F.E., Virgo, K.S., Lairmore, T.C., Audisio, R.A. (eds) The Bionic Human. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics