Abstract
Stimulation of tissues with electricity for medical purposes is not a new idea. Two thousand years ago, Roman physicians recommended the electrical discharge of the torpedo fish for the treatment of headache and gout. Interest in electrical methods of stimulating hearing began when Volta discovered the electrolytic cell in 1790. He inserted metal rods into his own ears and connected them to a circuit that produced approximately 50 volts. When the circuit was completed, he experienced a sensation which he described as a blow to the head; it was followed a few moments later by a noise that sounded like the boiling of a viscous liquid. Volta’s unpleasant experience probably discouraged others. Few attempts to investigate the phenomenon were carried out over the next 50 years, but the sensation was always momentary and lacked tonal quality. Nevertheless, it was apparent that a sense of hearing occurred with an electrical stimulation of the inner ear. A great deal of experimentation was needed to determine how this could be used to restore hearing. Many questions are still unanswered. What is the best way to “code” the complexities of sound into electrical pulse? Does it matter where the electrodes are placed inside the inner ear? What are the effects of long-term electrical inner ear stimulation on the hearing nerves and brain?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Djourno A, Eyries C. Prothèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensoriel à l’aide d’un bobinage inclus à demeure. Presse médicale 1957;35:14–17.
Niparko JK, Wilson BS. History of cochlear implant. In: Niparko JK, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, McConkey-Robbins A, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:103–107
Clark GM. Historical Perspectives. In: Clark GM, Cowan RS, Dowell RC, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children: advances. San Diego, CA: Singular, 1997.
Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Cochlear implantation: demand, costs and utility. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:245–248.
Telian SA, El-Kashlan HK, Arts HA. Minimizing wound complications in cochlear implant surgery. Am J Otol 1999;20(3):331–334.
Gibson WPR, Harrison HC, Prowse C. A new incision for placement of cochlear implants. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:821–825.
Cohen NL, Hoffman RA, Stroschein M. Medical or surgical complications related to the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;97(suppl 135):8–13.
Harris JP, Cueva RA. Flap design for cochlear implantation: avoidance of a potential complication. Laryngoscope 1987;97(6):755–757.
Clark GM, Pyman BC, Bailey QR. The surgery for multiple-electrode cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1979;93:215–223.
Parkins W, Metzinger SE, Marks HW, Lyons GD. Management of late extrusions of cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1998;19:768–773.
Ishida K, Shinkawa A, Sakai M, Tamura Y, Naito A. Cause and repair of flap necrosis over cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1997;18:472–474.
Cohen NL, Hoffman RA. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100(9 Pt 1):708–711.
Cohen NL, Hoffman RA, Strochein M. Medical or surgical complications related to the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;97:8–13.
Kempf HG, Johann K, Weber PB, Lenarz T. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in children. Am J Otol 1997;18:S62–S63.
Webb RL, Lehnardt E, Clark GM, Laszig R, Pyman BC, Franz BKHG. Surgical complications with the cochlear multiple-channel intracochlear Implant: experience at Hanover and Melbourne. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:131v136.
Hampton SM, Toner JG. Belfast Cochlear Implant Center; the surgical results of the first 100 implants. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2000;121:9–11.
Miyamoto RT, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Wagner-Escobar M. Aural rehabilitation. In: Hughes G, Pensak, eds. Clinical Otology (2nd ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997:395–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saliba, I., Fraysse, B. (2006). European Counterpoint to Chapter 16. In: Johnson, F.E., Virgo, K.S., Lairmore, T.C., Audisio, R.A. (eds) The Bionic Human. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_29
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-959-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-975-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)