Skip to main content

Animal Models in Biomedical Research

Ethics, Challenges, and Opportunities

  • Chapter
Principles of Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Diagnostic power needs to be matched to prognostic accuracy. To accomplish this, we need robust animal models that incorporate the same level of genetic and genomic variation as highly diverse human populations. A key goal of biomedical research is to provide clinicians with sufficient knowledge to predict disease risk and choose effective treatment. We are on the cusp of having complete genome data for each patient. However, our current understanding of complex biological systems and individual differences does not allow us to predict effects of novel interventions and drugs. Animal models provide precise genetic and experimental control, and they also provide a route to more rapid discovery and validation of disease prevention and treatment. But the successful application of experimental results to diverse humans requires that models accurately represent both the underlying disease process and the impact of human genetic variation on treatment and outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected References

  • Brenner S. Nature’s gift to science. Nobel Lecture 2002; pp. 274–282. (http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/2002/brenner-lecture.pdf). Accessed Jan. 14, 2006.

  • Chesler EJ, Wang J, Williams RW, Manly KF. Web QTL: Rapid exploratory analysis of gene expression and genetic networks for brain and behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:485–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F, Koch C. The unconscious homunculus. In: Metzinger T, ed. The Neuronal Correlates of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000; pp. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • deCODE Genetics. Reykjavik, Iceland (http://www.decodegenetics.com). Accessed May 11,2005.

  • Gudrais E. Chimpanzees and the law. Harv Mag 2003; 105: 21, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperwasser C, Chavarria T, Wu M, et al. Reconstruction of functionally normal and malignant human breast tissues in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 4966–4971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf C. Why we’re losing the war on cancer. Fortune 2004; 149: 76–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little CC. The role of heredity in determining the incidence and growth of cancer. Am J Cancer 1931; 15: 2780–2789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusis AJ, West D, Davis C. Animal models of complex genetic disease. In: King RA, Rotter JI, Motulsky AG, eds. The Genetic Basis of Common Disease, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002; pp. 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer R. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauling L, Itano HA. Sickle cell anemia: a molecular disease. Science 1949; 110: 543–548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gerhing WJ. Homology of the eyeless gene in Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and anirdia in humans. Science 1994; 2655: 785–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rader K. The mouse’s tale: standardized animals in the culture and practice of technoscience. Cabinet Mag 2001;http://www.cabinet magazine.org/issues/4/themousestale.php). Accessed Jan. 14, 2006.

  • Ryan TM, Townes TM, Reilly MP, et al. Human sickle hemoglobin in transgenic mice. Science 1990; 247: 566–568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silver LM. Mouse Genetics. Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threadgill DW, Hunter KW, Williams RW. Genetic dissection of complex and quantitative traits: from fantasy to reality via a community effort. Mamm Genome 2002; 13: 175–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel G. Scientists dream of 1001 complex mice. Science 2003; 301: 456, 457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ. Biochemical Individuality. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerhouni E. The NIH roadmap. Science 2003; 302: 63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, R.W. (2006). Animal Models in Biomedical Research. In: Runge, M.S., Patterson, C. (eds) Principles of Molecular Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-963-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-963-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-202-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-963-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics