Skip to main content

Haplotype-Based Computational Genetic Analysis In Mice

  • Chapter
Computational Genetics and Genomics

Abstract

A number of significant discoveries have resulted from genetic analysis of model experimental organisms. Improved methods for quantitative trait analysis, a process referred to as quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, have enabled investigators to make genetic discoveries. This mapping method requires the experimental generation of intercross progeny derived from two selected parental strains, chosen because they differ in a trait of interest. Through correlative analysis of the measured phenotype and genotype at multiple positions in the genome for each intercross progeny, regions of the genome responsible for the differences in the trait are identified. The genomic regions that quantitatively contribute to the trait are referred to as QTL. QTL analysis has been successfully used to map important traits in crop plants, cattle, fruit flies, mice, and many other model organisms. The statistical basis for QTL mapping has been thoroughly investigated (reviewed in ref. 1). Based on this statistical underpinning, experimental crosses using model organisms can be designed to reliably detect QTLs, even when the involved regions make a relatively small contribution to the trait being studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Doerge RW, Zeng Z-B, Wier BS. Statistical issues in the search for genes affecting quantitative traits in experimental populations. Stat Sci 1997;12:195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Darvasi A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet 1998;18:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Darvasi A, Soller MA simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of qtl map location. Behav Genet 1997;27:125–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao G, Wang J, Guo J, et al. In silico genetics: identification of a novel functional element regulating H2-Ea gene expression. Science 2004;306: 690–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grupe A, Germer S, Usuka J, et al. In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice [see comments]. Science 2001;292:1915–1918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wade CM, Kulbokas EJ, Kirby AW, et al. The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 2002;420:574–578.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patil N, Berno AJ, Hinds DA, et al. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21 [see comments]. Science 2001;294:1719–1723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson GC, Esposito L, Barratt BJ, et al. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet 2001;29:233–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daly MJ, Rioux JD, Schaffner SF, et al. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet 2001;29:229–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang K, Deng M, Chen T, et al. A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7335–7339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcqueen JB. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Le Cam LM, Neyman J, eds. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkeley, CA: University Of California Press, 1967:pp. 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milligan GW, Cooper MC. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 1985;50:159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 1994; 138:963–971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher RA. The design of experiments. London: Oliver & Boyd Ltd., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson Labs. Mhc haplotypes. Jackson Laboratory Notes. 1998;475.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Calinski T, Harabasz J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 1974;3:1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, J., Peltz, G. (2005). Haplotype-Based Computational Genetic Analysis In Mice. In: Peltz, G. (eds) Computational Genetics and Genomics. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-930-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics