Advertisement

Counseling Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

Radiation or Surgery?
  • Eric A. Klein
  • Patrick A. Kupelian
Chapter
  • 138 Downloads
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP). A randomized trial published in 1982 showing an advantage to RP was never widely accepted because of randomization artifacts and worse than previously reported RT results (1,2). The Southwest Oncology Group closed a randomized study comparing these two modalities in the mid-1980s owing to poor accrual. In 1993, Stamey et al. (3) reported a 20% 5-yr biochemical cure rate with RT and suggested that radiation accelerates prostate cancer growth. Subsequently, large RT series were published with outcome results stratified by biopsy grade, T stage, and serum PSA, demonstrating similar short-term outcomes for RT and RP (4–6). A close examination of the patients treated by RT in the series of Stamey et al. (3) suggests that the observation of a 20% “cure” rate with RT can largely be explained by patient selection factors—all patients had high-volume cancers diagnosed by palpable lesions, 35% had clinical stage C disease, 50% had Gleason sum ≥7, and 15% had positive lymph nodes (7). Furthermore, Liebman et al. (8) have subsequently demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity is similar in those who fail radiation or surgery. None of these studies clearly answers the question of which is the best local therapy for localized prostate cancer. The unsettled nature of this issue is further complicated by the marked polarization of radiation oncologists and urologists in their counseling of patients with newly diagnosed localized disease, with surgeons recommending surgery and radiation therapists recommending radiation in virtually all circumstances (9).

Keywords

Prostate Cancer Radical Prostatectomy Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Localize Prostate Cancer Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paulson DF, Lin GH, Hinshaw W, et al. Radical surgery versus radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1982; 128: 502–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanks GE. More on the Uro-Oncology Research Group report of radical surgery vs radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14: 1053–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stamey T, Ferrari M, Schmid H. The value of serial prostate specific antigen determinations 5 years after radiotherapy: steeply increasing values characterize 80% of patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 1856–1859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zagars G, von Eschenbach A. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen: an important marker for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiotherapy. Cancer 1993; 72: 538–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zagars GK. Serum PSA as a tumor marker for patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy. Urol Clin North Am 1993; 20: 737–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zagars GK. Prostate specific antigen as an outcome variable for T1 and T2 prostate cancer treated by radiation therapy. J Urol 1994; 152: 1786–1791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zietman AL, Shipley WU. Re: The value of serial prostate specific antigen determinations 5 years after radiotherapy: steeply increasing values characterize 80% of patients. J Urol 1994;152:1564–1565; discussion 1565–1566.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leibman BD, Dillioglugil O, Scardino PT, et al. Prostate-specific antigen doubling times are similar in patients with recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a novel analysis. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2267–2271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fowler FJ Jr, McNaughton Collins M, Albertsen PC, et al. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2000; 283: 3217–3222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jhaveri FM, Klein EA, Kupelian PA, et al. Declining rates of extracapsular extension after radical prostatectomy: evidence for continued stage migration. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3167–3172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han M, Partin AW, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166: 416–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elder JS, Jewett HJ, Walsh PC. Radical perineal prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1982; 127: 704–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ragde H, Blasko JC, Grimm PD, et al. Interstitial iodine-125 radiation without adjuvant therapy in the treatment of clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80: 442–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polascik T, Pound CR, DeWeese TL, Walsh PC. Comparison of radical prostatectomy and iodine 125 interstitial radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer: a 7-year biochemical (PSA) progression analysis. Urology 1998; 51: 884–890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramos CG, Carvalhal GF, Smith DS, Mager DE, Catalona WJ. Retrospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and 125 iodine brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1999; 161: 1212–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Svetec D, McCabe K, Peretsman S, et al. Sextant prostate biopsy is a poor surrogate endpoint for the evaluation of treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 1606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jhaveri FM, Zippe CD, Klein EA, Kupelian PA. Biochemical failure does not predict overall survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: 10 year results. Urology 1999; 54: 884–890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kupelian PA, Buchsbaum JC, Patel C, et al. Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 704–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999; 281: 1591–1597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iselin CE, Robertson JE, Paulson DF. Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period. J Urol 1999; 161: 163–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah R, Bassily N, Wei J, et al. Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors. Urology 2000; 56: 721–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37:1035–1041.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanlon AL, Hanks GE. Scrutiny of the ASTRO consensus definition of biochemical failure in irradiated prostate cancer patients demonstrates its usefulness and robustness. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 559–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gretzer MB, Trock B, Han M, Walsh PC. A critical analysis of the interpretation of biochemical failure in surgically treated patients using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology criteria. AUA Meeting, 2002 (abstract #269).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Critz FA, Levinson K, Williams WH, Holladay D, Holladay C, Griffin V. Prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.5 ng/mL or less defines disease freedom for surgically staged men irradiated for prostate cancer. Urology 1997; 49: 668–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanks GE, et al. American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology Meeting, 2001 (abstract #203).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patel C, Elshaikh MA, Angermeier K, Ulchaker J, Klein EA, Chidel MA, Wilkinson DA, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP. Erratic PSA behavior (PSA bounce) following permanent 125I implantation of the prostate. (Submitted)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kupelian PA, Elshaikh M, Reddy CA, Zippe C, Klein EA. Comparison of the efficacy of local therapies for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: a large single institution experience with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3376–3385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clark PE, Levin HS, Kupelian PA, Reddy C, Zippe CD, Klein EA. Intermediate-term outcome with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: The Cleveland Clinic Experience. Prostate J, 2001; 3: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein EA, Kupelian P, Tuason L, Levin H. Initial dissection of the lateral fascia reduces the positive margin rate in radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998; 51: 766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Divine G, et al. Comparison of long-term survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer managed conservatively, with definitive radiation or radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001; 165: 151.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kupelian PA, Khuntia D, Potters L, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy 72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1–T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004; 58: 25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vincini FA, Martinez A, Hanks G, Hanlon A, et al. An interinstitutional and interspecialty comparison of treatment outcome data for patients with prostate carcinoma based on predefined prognostic categories and minimum follow-up. Cancer 2002; 95: 2126–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Licht MC, Klein EA. Early hospital discharge after radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on cost and complication rate. Urology 1994; 44: 700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klein EA, Licht MR. Reducing length of stay after radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol 1995; 13: 137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Litwin MS, Smith RB, Thind A, Reccius N, Blanco-Yarosh M, deKernion JB. Cost-efficient radical prostatectomy with a clinical care path. J Urol 1996; 155: 989–993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gaylis FD, Friedel WE, Armas OA. Radical retropubic prostatectomy outcomes at a community hospital. J Urol 1998; 159: 167–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ng CS, Klein EA. Acute complications after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Prostate J 2000; 2: 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Klein EA. Early continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1992; 148: 92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence, and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162: 433–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pollack A, Zagars G, Starkshall G, et al. Conventional vs conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 34: 555–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Teh B, Uhl B, Augspurger M, Grant W, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results of acute toxicity compared to conventional and six-field conformal approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42 (suppl 1): 219.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zelefsky M, Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, et al. The feasibility of dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with prostatic carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am 1995; 1: 142–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lawton CA, Won M, Pilepich MV, et al. Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 935–939.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shipley WU, Zietman AL, Hanks GE, et al. Treatment related sequelae following external beam radiation for prostate cancer: a review with an update in patients with stages T1 and T2 tumor. J Urol 1994; 152: 1799–1805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zelefsky MJ, Aschkenasy E, Kelsen S, Leibel SA. Tolerance and early outcome results of postprostatectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 327–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Ten Haken RK, et al. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: low risk of chronic rectal morbidity observed in a large series of patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33: 797–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schultheiss TE, Lee WR, Hunt MA, et al. Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37: 3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gelblum DY, Potters L, Ashley R, et al. Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45: 59–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schover LR, Fouladi RT, Warneke CL, et al. Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Cancer, in press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Talcott JA, Rieker P, Clark JA, et al. Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 275–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Potosky AL, Legler J, Albertsen PC, et al. Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1582–1592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sanda MG, Dunn R, Wei JT, et al. HRQOL determinants of prostate cancer patient satisfaction after prostatectomy, external radiation or brachytherapy at referral and community practices. AUA Meeting, 2002 (abstract #626).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ben-Josef E, Forman JD, Cher ML, Kaufman N, Frazier AJ. Erectile function following permanent prostate brachytherapy. AUA Meeting, 2002 (abstract #1558).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    van der Hoeven J, Bevers RFM, Jeroen RA, van Moorselaar JRA, Battermann JJ, Boon TA. A prospective study of erectile function following transperineal I-125 seed implantation for localised prostate cancer. AUA Meeting, 2002 (abstract #1348).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Litwin MS, Lubeck DP, Henning JM, Carroll PR. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J Urol 1998; 159: 1988–1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jhaveri FM, Klein EA. How to explore the patient with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy: defining local versus systemic failure. Semin Urol Oncol 1999; 17: 130–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Svetec D, McCabe K, Peretsman S, et al. Sextant prostate biopsy is a poor surrogate endpoint for the evaluation of treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 1606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rogers E, Ohori M, Kassabian VS, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Salvage radical prostatectomy: outcome measured by serum prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 1995; 153: 104–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, Tiguert R, et al. Predictors for maximal outcome in patients undergoing salvage surgery for radio-recurrent prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 51: 789–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pontes J, Montie JE, Klein EA, Huben R. Salvage surgery for radiation failure in prostate cancer. Cancer 1993; 71: 976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tefilli MV, Gheiler EL, Tiguert R, et al. Quality of life in patients undergoing salvage procedures for locally recurrent prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69: 156–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Leventis AK, Shariat SF, Kattan MW, Butler EB, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM. Prediction of response to salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1030–1039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brenner DJ, Curtis RE, Hall EJ, Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer 2000; 88: 398–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Neugut AI, Ahsan H, Robinson E, Ennis RD. Bladder carcinoma and other second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 79: 1600–1604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brandeis J, Pashos CL, Henning JM, Litwin MS. A nationwide charge comparison of the principal treatments for early stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 1792–1799.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ciezki J, Angermeier K, Ulchaker J, Zippe C, Wilkinson A, Klein EA. Cost comparison of radical prostatectomy and transperineal brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 2000; 55: 68–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kupelian PA, Buchsbaum JC, Elshaikh M, Reddy CA, Zippe C, Klein EA. Factors affecting relapse rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above: therapeutic implications. Cancer, 2002; 95: 2302–2307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kupelian PA, Buchsbaum JC, Elshaikh M, Reddy CA, Zippe C, Klein EA. Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above. Cancer 2002; 95: 2302–2307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric A. Klein
  • Patrick A. Kupelian

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations