Dynamics of Arthropod-Borne Diseases

  • Jerome Goddard
Part of the Infectious Disease book series (ID)


Transmission of etiologic agents by arthropods is a complex phenomenon, and generalizations are difficult to make. Just because an arthropod feeds on a diseased host does not ensure that it can become infected, nor does it ensure (even if disease agents are ingested) that ingested pathogens can survive and develop. There is considerable misunderstanding about this. When bitten by a tick, people think of Lyme disease (or something similar), often insisting that their physician prescribe an antibiotic prophylactically. Little do they realize that there are many tick species and not all are capable of disease transmission (1). Further, they fail to realize that not every tick in nature (even within a vector species) can be infected. Depending on the disease and area of the country, the presence of an infected tick can be like a needle in a haystack.


Lyme Disease Disease Agent Spotted Fever Infected Tick Spotted Fever Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lane RS, Competence of ticks as vectors of microbial agents with an emphasis on Borrelia burgdorferi. In: Sonenshine DE Mather TN, eds. Ecological Dynamics of Tick-borne Zoonoses. Oxford University Press, New York, 1994, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McHugh CP. Arthropods: vectors of disease agents. Lab Med 1994; 25: 429437.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain RW, Sudia WD. Mechanism of transmission of viruses by mosquitoes. Ann Rev Entomol 1961; 6: 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harwood RF, James MT. Entomology in Human and Animal Health, 7th ed. Macmillan, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azad AF, Beard CB. Rickettsial pathogens and their arthropod vectors. Emerg Infect 1998; 4: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lane RP, Crosskey RW. Medical Insects and Arachnids. Chapman and Hall, London, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burgdorfer W, Brinton PL. Mechanisms of transovarial infection of spotted fever rickettsiae in ticks. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1975; 266: 61–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niebylski ML, Schrumpf ME, Burgdorfer W, Fischer ER, Gage KL, Schwan TG. Rickettsia peacockii sp nov., a new species infecting wood ticks in western Montana. Int J Sys Bacteriol 1997; 47: 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McHugh CP. Ecology of a semi-isolated population of adult Anopheles freeborni: abundance, trophic status parity, survivorship, gonotrophic cycle length, and host selection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1989; 41: 169–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter CH, Collins FH. Susceptibility of Anopheles hermsi to Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1990; 42: 414–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 10a.
    Gray HF. The confusing epidimiology of malaria in California. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1956; 5: 411–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 10b.
    Gray HF, Fontaine RE. A history of malaria in California. Proc CA Mosq Control Assoc 1957; 25: 1–20.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Jensen T, Dritz DA, Fritz GN, Washino RK, Reeves WC. Lake Vera revisited: parity and survival rates of Anopheles punctipennis at the site of a malaria outbreak in the Sierra Nevada foothills of California. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 59: 591–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerome Goddard
    • 1
  1. 1.Mississippi Department of HealthUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations