Skip to main content

New Paradigms in the Management of Hormone Refractory Disease

  • Chapter
Management of Prostate Cancer

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

A paradigm is the philosophical and theoretical framework in which a scientific field formulates theories and approaches to questions. The traditional paradigm in prostate cancer has been that once a prostate cancer exhibits clinical hormone insensitivity, therapeutic interventions, especially chemotherapy, are of little benefit. This belief was supported by the disappointing and sobering experience with antiproliferative chemotherapy administered in a traditional manner (1). Recent discoveries, both in the clinic and laboratory, have changed the approach to the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). It has been demonstrated that prostate cancer cells grow slowly; this fact has tremendous impact on the design of clinical trials (2). Clinically, an increased appreciation of both the importance of quality of life and continued hormone responsiveness has led to substantial changes in the management of advanced prostate cancer (3). The use of palliative end points, prolonged oral chemotherapy, and combined chemohormonal therapy are examples of the new paradigm in the management of HRPC that are currently being applied in the clinic. However, another shift is also occurring. This involves the investigation of novel molecular mechanisms as targets of therapy. These processes include angiogenesis, metastasis, and differentiation. Therapies directed at these targets are still early in their development, but hold great promise for the future management of HRPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eisenberger MA. Chemotherapy for prostate cancer. NCI Monogr 1988; 7: 151–163.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berges RR, Vukanovic J, Epstein JI, et al. Implications of cell kinetic changes during the progression of human prostatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1995; 1: 473–480.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith DC. Secondary hormonal therapy. Semin Urol Oncol 1997; 15: 3–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millikan R, Logothetis C. Update of the NCCN guidelines for treatment of prostate cancer. Oncology 1997; 11: 180–193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esper PS, Pienta KJ. Supportive care in the patient with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 1997; 15: 56–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamdy FC, Williams JL. Use of dexamethasone for ureteric obstruction in advanced prostate cancer: percutaneous nephrostomies can be avoided. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 782–785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Storlie JA, Buckner JC, Wiseman GA, Burch PA, Hartmann LC, Richardson RL. Prostate specific antigen levels and clinical response to low dose dexamethasone for hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1995; 76: 96–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tannock I, Gospodarowicz M, Meakin W, Panzarella T, Stewart L, Rider W. Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 590–597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Esper P, Fei M, Chodak G, Sinner M, Cella D, Pienta KJ. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology 1997; 50: 920–928.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tannock IF, Osoba D, Stockler MR, et al. Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative endpoints. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1756–1764.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pienta KJ, Lehr JE. Inhibition of prostate cancer growth by estramustine and etoposide: evidence for interaction at the nuclear matrix. J Urol 1993; 149: 1622–1625.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pienta KJ, Redman B, Hussain M, et al. Phase II evaluation of oral estramustine and oral etoposide in hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2005–2012.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pienta KJ, Redman BG, Bandekar R, et al. A phase II trial of oral estramustine and oral etoposide in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 401–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimopoulos MA, Panopoulos C, Bamia C, et al. Oral estramustine and oral etoposide for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 754–758.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Batra S, Karlsson R, Witt L. Potentiation by estramustine of the cytotoxic effect of vinblastine and doxorubicin in prostatic tumor cells. Int J Cancer 1996; 68: 644–649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudes GR, Greenberg R, Krigel RL, et al. Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two micro-tubule inhibitors, in hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1754–1761.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seidman AD, Scher HI, Petrylak D, Dershaw DD, Curley T. Estramustine and vinblastine: use of prostate specific antigen as a clinical trial endpoint for hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Urol 1992; 147: 931–934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Attivissimo LA, Fetten JV, Kreis W. Symptomatic improvement associated with combined estramustine and vinblastine chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1996; 19: 581–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahllof B, Billstrom A, Cabal F, Hartley-Asp B. Estramustine depolymerizes microtubules by binding to tubulin. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 4573–4581.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. Paclitaxel (Taxol). N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1004–1014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pienta KJ, Naik H, Lehr JE. Effect of estramustine, etoposide and taxol on prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Urology 1996; 48: 164–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Speicher LA, Barone L, Tew KD. Combined antimicrotubule activity of estramustine and taxol in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 4433–4440.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hudes GR, Nathan F, Khater C, et al. Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 3156–3163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sella A, Kilbourn R, Amato R, et al. Phase II study of ketoconazole combined with weekly doxorubicin in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 683–688.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellerhorst JA, Tu S, Amato RJ, et al. Phase II trial of alternating weekly chemohormonal therapy for patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 3: 2371–2376.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nature Med 1995; 1: 27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferrer FA, Miller LJ, Andrawis RI, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human prostate cancer: in situ and in vitro expression of VEGF by human prostate cancer cells. J Urol 1997; 157: 2329–2333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Joseph IBJK, Isaacs JT. Potentiation of the antiangiogenic ability of linomide by androgen ablation involves down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in human androgen-responsive prostatic cancers. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 1054–1057.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fregene TA, Khanuja PS, Noto AC, et al. Tumor-associated angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 1993; 13: 2377–2382.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Silberman MA, Partin AW, Veltri RW, Epstein JI. Tumor angiogenesis correlates with progression after radical prostatectomy but not with pathologic stage in Gleason sum 5 to 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1997; 79: 772–779.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ichikawa T, Lamb JC, Christensson PI, Hartley-Asp B, Isaacs JT. The antitumor effects of the quinoline3-carboxamide linomide on Dunning R-3327 rat prostatic cancers. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 3022–3028.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vukanovic J, Passaniti A, Hirata T, Traystman RJ, Hartley-Asp B, Isaacs JT. Antiangiogenic effects of the quinoline-3-carboxamide linomide. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 1833–1837.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vukanovic J, Isaacs JT. Human prostatic cancer cells are sensitive to programmed (apoptotic) death induced by the antiangiogenic agent linomide. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 3517–3520.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Joseph IBJK, Vukanovic J, Isaacs JT. Antiangiogenic treatment with as chemoprevention for prostate, seminal vesicle and breast carcinogenesis in rodents. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 3404–3408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bergh JCS, Totterman TH, Termander BC, Strandgarden KAP, Gunnarsson POG, Nilsson BI. The first clinical pilot study of Roquinimex (linomide) in cancer patients with special focus on immunological effects. Cancer Invest 1997; 15: 204–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pawinski A, van Oosterom AT, de Wit R, et al. An EORTC Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of linomide in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 496–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. de Wit R, Pawinsky A, Stoter G, et al. EORTC Phase II study of daily oral linomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with good prognostic factors. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 493–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. D’ Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 4082–4085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Figg WD, Bergan R, Brawley O, et al. Randomized phase II study of thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997; 16: 1189 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dixon SC, Bauer KS, Zalles A, Lush RM, Figg WD. Thalidomide effects on angiogenesis and PSA expression. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1997; 38: 2866 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yamaoka M, Yamamoto T, Ikeyama S, Sudo K, Fujita T. Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 (AGM-1470) potently inhibits the tumor growth of hormone-independent human breast and prostate carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 5233–5236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zukiwski A, Gutterman J, Bui C, et al. Phase I trial of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 (AGM-1470) in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994; 13: 795 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dixon SC, Horti J, Logothetis CJ, et al. TNP-470 up regulates the expression of prostate specific antigen. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: A298 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Brusilow SW, Danney M, Waber LJ, et al. Treatment of episodic hyperammonemia in children with inborn errors of urea synthesis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1630–1634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Piscitelli SC, Thibault A, Figg WD, et al. Disposition of phenylbutyrate and its metabolites, phenylacetate and phenylacetylglutamine. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35: 368–373.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Samid D, Shack S, Myers CE. Selective growth arrest and phenotypic reversion of prostate cancer cells in vitro by nontoxic pharmacological concentrations of phenylacetate. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 2288–2295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Carducci MA, Nelson JB, Chan-Tack KM, et al. Phenylbutyrate induces apoptosis in human prostate cancer and is more potent than phenylacetate. Clin Cancer Res 1996; 2: 379–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ng YK, Bales W, Box E, Pickens C, Veltri RW. Bc1–2 and bax but not p53 or Fas are involved in prostate cancer cell apoptosis induced by phenylbutyrate. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: A3882 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gao M, Ossowski L, Ferrari AC. Molecular mechanisms of phenylbutyrate induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: A681 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yang Q, Tong K, David-Beabes G, Meeker A, Carducci M. Phenylbutyrate induces cyclin-dependent kinase regulators, suppresses topoisomerase IIa and inhibits telomerase activity in human prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: A4007 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thibault A, Cooper MR, Figg WD, et al. A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous phenyl-acetate in patients with cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 1690–1694.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Prados MD, Spence A, Schold C, et al. A phase II trial of phenylacetic acid for recurrent malignant glioma. Preliminary report of the North American Brain Tumor Consortium. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: 288 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Thibault A, Samid D, Cooper MR, et al. Phase I study of phenylacetate administered twice daily to patients with cancer. Cancer 1995; 75: 2932–2938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Carducci M, Bowling M, Eisenberger M, et al. Phenylbutyrate for refractory solid tumors: a phase I clinical and pharmacological evaluation. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1996; 37: 1152 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thibault A, Figg WD, Samid D. A phase I study of the differentiating agent phenylbutyrate in patients with cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: 1539 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Carducci M, Bowling MK, Eisenberger M, et al. Phenylbutyrate for refractory solid tumors: phase I evaluation of continuos oral exposure. Proc Ann Meet Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: A3448 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Walls R, Thibault A, Liu L, et al. The differentiating agent phenylacetate increases prostate-specific antigen production by prostate cancer cells. Prostate 1996; 29: 177–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bowling MK, Nelson JB, Tong KP, et al. Biomarker responses in men with advanced prostate cancer to infusional phenylbutyrate. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: 43 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chambers AF, Matrisian LM. Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1260–1270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pajouh MS, Nagle RB, Breathnach R, Finch JS, Brawer MK, Bowden GT. Expression of metalloproteinases genes in human prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1991; 117: 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Jung K, Nowak L, Lein M, Priem F, Schnorr D, Loening SA. Matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and the complex of metalloproteinase-1/tissue inhibitor in plasma of patients with prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 1997; 74: 220–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Powell WC, Knox JD, Navre M, et al. Expression of the metalloproteinase matrilysin in DU-145 cells increases their invasive potential in severe combined inununodeficient mice. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 417–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lokeshwar BL, Selzer MG, Block NL, Gunja-Smith Z. Secretion of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases) by human prostate in explant cultures: reduced tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase secretion by malignant tissues. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 4493–4498.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wojtowicz-Praga S, Low J, Marshall J, et al. Phase I trial of a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat (BB-94) in patients with advanced cancer. Invest New Drugs 1996; 14: 193–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Boasberg P, Harbaugh B, Roth B, et al. Marimastat, a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: A671 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Platt D, Raz A. Modulation of the lung colonization of B16–F1 melanoma cells by citrus pectin. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 438–442.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pienta KJ, Naik H, Akhtar A, et al. Inhibition of spontaneous metastasis in a rat prostate cancer model by oral administration of modified citrus pectin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 348–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hussain M, Wolf M, Marshall E, Crawford ED, Eisenberger M. Effects of continued androgen-deprivation therapy and other prognostic factors on response and survival in phase II chemotherapy trials for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Report. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1868–1875.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Taylor CD, Elson P, Trump DL. Importance of continued testicular suppression in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 2167–2172.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kelly WK, Scher HI. Prostate specific antigen decline after antiandrogen withdrawal: the flutamide withdrawal syndrome. J Urol 1993; 149: 607–609.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Scher HI, Kelly WK. Flutamide withdrawal syndrome: its impact on clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1566–1572.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Figg WD, Sartor O, Cooper MR, et al. Prostate specific antigen decline following the discontinuation of flutamide in patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. Am J Med 1995; 98: 412–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Small EJ, Srinivas S. The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. Experience in a large cohort of unselected patients with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 1995; 76: 1428–1434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Small EJ, Carroll PR. Prostate-specific antigen decline after Casodex withdrawal: evidence for an anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome. Urology 1994; 43: 408–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Dawson NA, McLeod DG. Dramatic prostate specific antigen decrease in response to discontinuation of megesterol acetate in advanced prostate cancer: expansion of the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. J Urol 1995; 153: 1946–1947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bissada NK, Kaczmarek AT. Complete remission of hormone refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate in response to withdrawal of diethylstilbestrol. J Urol 1995; 153: 1944, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sartor O, Cooper M, Weinberger M, et al. Surprising activity of flutamide withdrawal, when combined with aminoglutethimide, in treatment of “hormone refractory” prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 222–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Figg WD, Dawson N, Middleman MN, et al. Flutamide withdrawal and concomitant initiation of aminoglutethimide in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 1996; 35: 763–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Small EJ, Baron AD, Fippin L, Apodaca D. Ketoconazole retains activity in advanced prostate cancer patients with progression despite flutamide withdrawal. J Urol 1997; 157: 1204–1207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Dawson NA, Small EJ, Conaway M, et al. Megesterol acetate in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: A601 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Spremulli E, DeSimone P, Durant J. A phase II trial of Nolvadex: Tamoxifen citrate in the treatment of advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 149–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Verhelst J, De Longueville M, Ongena P, et al. Octreotide in advanced prostatic cannier relapsing under hormonal treatment. Acta Urol Belg 1994; 62: 83–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Figg WD, Thibault A, Cooper MR, et al. A phase I study of the somatostatin analogue somatuline in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer 1995; 75: 2159–2164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Osborn JL, Schwartz GG, Smith DC, cvcv, m, g. Phase II trial of oral 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 1996; 1: 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Smith DC, Redman BG, Flaherty LE, Li L, Strawderman M, Pienta KJ. Phase II Trial of oral diethylstilbestrol as a second-line hormonal agent in advanced prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 52: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Joyce R, Fenton MA, Rode P, et al. High dose bicalutamide for androgen independent prostate cancer: effect of prior hormonal therapy. J Urol 1998; 159: 149–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Oesterling JE, Chan DW, Epstein JI. Prostate specific antigen in preoperative and postoperative evaluation of prostate cancer. J Urol 1988; 139: 766–772.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Zagars GK, Von Eschenbach AC. Prostate specific antigen. An important marker for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiation therapy. Cancer 1993; 72: 538–548.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Brausi M, Jones WG, Fossa SD, et al. High dose epirubicin is effective in measureable metastatic prostate cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC Genitourinary Group. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 1622–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Kelly WK, Scher HI, Mazumdar M, Vlamis V, Schwartz M, Fossa SD. Prostate-specific antigen as a measure of disease outcome in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 607–615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Myers C, Cooper M, Stein C, et al. Suramin: a novel growth factor antagonist with activity in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 881–889.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Smith DC, Dunn RL, Strawderman MS, Pienta KJ. Change in serum prostate specific antigen as a marker of response to cytotoxic therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1835–1843.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Sridhara R, Eisenberger MA, Sinibaldi VJ, Reyno LM, Egorin MJ. Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a surrogate marker for response of hormone-refractory prostate cancer to suramin therapy. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2944–2953.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Pienta KJ, Esper PS, Smith DC. The oral regimen of cytoxan, prednisone and diethylstilbestrol is an active, non-toxic treatment for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997; 16: A1104 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamradt, J.M., Pienta, K.J. (2000). New Paradigms in the Management of Hormone Refractory Disease. In: Klein, E.A. (eds) Management of Prostate Cancer. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-714-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-714-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9826-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-714-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics