Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioethical Issues in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit

  • Chapter
Critical Care Neurology and Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Neurology ((CCNEU))

  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

Critical care physicians, particularly neurointensivists, are faced with daily complex bioethical issues that often times are very difficult to solve. Despite the amount of time spent dealing with these problems, there is little training in this area in both graduate and postgraduate medical training programs. Therefore, most of what is learned comes from observing senior clinical faculty, making adequate training variable and difficult to assess.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gert B, Culver CM, Clouser KD, eds. Bioethics. A Return to Fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernat JL, ed. Ethical Issues in Neurology. Boston: Butterworth-Heineman, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ, eds. Clinical Ethics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, eds. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caplan AL, Coehlo DH, eds. The Ethics of Organ Transplants: The Current Debate. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ. Organ Transplantation: Meanings and Realities. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanks P, ed. Collins Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd ed. London and Glasgow: Collins, 1986: 1000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanks P, ed. Collins Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd ed. London and Glasgow: Collins, 1986: 101

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanks P, ed. Collins Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd ed. London and Glasgow: Collins, 1986: 829.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall MF, Schwenzer KJ, Orsina M, Fletcher JC, Durbin CG Jr. Influence of political power, medical provincialism, and economic incentives on the rationing of surgical intensive care unit beds. Crit. Care Med. 1992; 20: 387–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2221–2226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook D. Patient autonomy versus parentalism. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: N24–N25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meier DE, Morrison RS. Autonomy reconsidered. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346: 1087–1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prendergast TJ. Advance care planning: pitfalls, progress, promise. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: N34–N39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Annas GJ. Nancy Cruzan and the right to die. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990; 323: 670–673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Annas GJ, Arnold B, Aroskar M, et al. Bioethicists’ statement on the US Supreme Court’s Cruzan decision. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990; 323: 686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fins JJ, Solomon MZ. Communication in intensive care settings: The challenge of futility disputes. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: N10–N15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Rubenfeld GD. The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: ooportunities for improvement. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: N26–N33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincent JL. Cultural differences in end-of-life care. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: N52–N55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346: 1061–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997; 155: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care of critically-ill patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998;158:11,163–11,167

    Google Scholar 

  24. Faber-Langendoen K. A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals. Ethical and practice implications. Arch. Intern. Med. 1996; 156: 2130–2136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology 1999; 12: 1602–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Support Principal Investigators: a controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995;274:1591–1598.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weir RF, Gotlin L. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability after Cruzan. JAMA 1990; 264: 1846–1853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Luce JM. Ethical principles in critical care. JAMA 1990; 263: 696–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1991; 144: 726–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Faber-Langendoen K, Lanken PN, for the ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. Dying patients in the intensive care unit: forgoing treatment, maintaining care. Ann. Intern. Med. 2000; 133: 886–893.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nyman DJ, Sprung CL. End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2000; 26: 1414–1420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Truong RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: 2332–2348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: Patients’ perspectives. JAMA 1999; 281: 163–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Danis M, Federman D, Fins JJ, et al. Incorporating palliative care into critical care education: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Crit. Care Med. 1999; 27: 2005–2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Council on Scientific Affairs American Medical Association. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA 1996; 275: 474–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hampe SO. Needs of the grieving spouse in a hospital setting. Nurs. Res. 1975; 24: 113–120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Furukawa MM. Meetings the needs of the dying patient’s family. Crit. Care Nurse 1996; 16: 51–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Asch DA. The role of critical care nurses in euthanasia and assisted suicide. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 334: 1374–1379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brody H, Campbell ML, Faber-Langendoen K, et al. Withdrawing intensive life-sustaining treatment—Recommendations for compassionate clinical management. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 652–657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCann RM, Hall WJ, Groth-Juncker A. Comfort care for terminally ill patients: The appropriate use of nutrition and hydration. JAMA 1994; 272: 1263–1266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Printz LA. Terminal dehydration, a compasionate treatment. Arch. Intern. Med. 1992; 152: 697–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gillick MR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342: 206–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gilligan T, Raffin TA. Withdrawing life support: Extubation and prolonged terminal weans are inappropriate. Crit. Care Med. 1996; 24: 352–353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilligan T, Raffin TA. Rapid withdrawal of support. Chest 1995; 108: 1407–1408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Krishna G, Raffin TA. Terminal weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit. Care Med. 1999; 27: 9–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gianakos D. Terminal weaning. Chest 1995; 108: 1405–1406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Campbell ML, Frank RR. Experience with an end-of-life practice at a university hospital. Crit. Care Med. 1997; 25: 197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Campbell ML. Breaking bad news to patients. JAMA 1994; 271: 1052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Krahn GL, Hallum A, Kime C. Are there good ways to give “bad news”? Pediatrics 1993; 91: 578–582.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ptaceck JT, Eberhardt TL. Breaking bad news. JAMA 1996; 276: 496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Quill TE, Townsend P. Bad news: delivery, dialogue, and dilemmas. Arch. Intern. Med. 1991; 151: 463–468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Williams MA, Suarez JI. Brain death determination in adults: more than meets the eye. Crit. Care Med. 1997; 25: 1787–1788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Plum F. Clinical standards and technological confirmatory tests in diagnosing brain death. In Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death. Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 34–65.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Brody BA. How much of the brain must be dead? In Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death. Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Halevy A, Brody B. Brain death: Reconciling definitions, criteria, and tests. Ann. Intern. Med. 1993; 119: 519–525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA 1968; 205: 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Youngner SJ. Brain death: A superficial and fragile consensus. Arch. Neurol. 1992; 49: 570–572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. O’Connell LJ. The realities of organ transplantation. In Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ, eds. Organ Transplantation. Meanings and Realities. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin University Press, 1996: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Caplan AL. Ethical and policy issues in the procurement of cadaver organs for transplantation. In Caplan AL, Coehlo DH, eds. The Ethics of Organ Transplants. The Current Debate. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1998: 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Federal Register Final Rule: Hospital Conditions for Participation for Organ Donation (42 CFR Part 482), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare and Medicaid programs; emergency recertification for coverage for organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Interim final rule with comment period. Fed. Regist. 2001;66:67,109–67,111.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gortmaker SL, Beasley CL, Sheehy E, et al. Improving the request process to increase family consent for organ donation. J. Transpl. Coord. 1998; 8: 210–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kerridge IH, Saul P, Lowe M, McPhee J, Williams D. Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death. J. Med. Ethics 2002; 28: 89–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Merle JC. A Kantian argument for a duty to donate one’s own organs. A reply to Nicole Gerrand. J. Appl. Philos. 2000; 17: 93–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Murray TH. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies? Health Matrix J. Law Med. 1991; 1: 19–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pugliese MR, Degli Esposito D, Venturoli N, et al. Hospital attitude survey on organ donation in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. Transpl. Int. 2001; 14: 411–419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Spital A. Mandated choice for organ donation: time to give it a try. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996; 125: 66–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Klassen AC, Klassen DK. Who are the donors in organ donation? The family’s perspective in mandated choice. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996; 125: 70–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Youngner SJ. Some must die. In Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ, eds. Organ Transplantation. Meanings and Realities. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin University Press, 1996: 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Fiedler LA. Why organ transplant programs do not succeed. In Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ, eds. Organ Transplantation. Meanings and Realities. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin University Press, 1996: 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ott BB. Defining and redefining death. In Caplan AL, Coehlo DH, eds. The Ethics of Organ Transplants. The Current Debate. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1998: 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Murray TH. Organ vendors, families, and the gift of life. In Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ, eds. Organ Transplantation. Meanings and Realities. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin University Press, 1996: 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Guy BS, Aldridge A. Marketing organ donation around the globe. Mark Health Serv. 2001; 21: 30–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lovasik D. Brain death and organ donation. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. North Am. 2000; 12: 531–538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Bollinger RR, Heinrichs DR, Seem DL, et al. Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices. Clin. Transplant 2001; 15 (suppl 6): 16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Andresen J. Cultural competence and health care: Japanese, Korean, and Indian patients in the United States. J. Cult. Divers. 2001; 8: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Samaritan Transplant Services, Phoenix, AZ. Development of a culturally sensitive, locality-based program to increase kidney donation. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther. 2002; 9: 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Youngner SJ. Applying futility: Saying no is not enough. JAGS 1994; 42: 887–889.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meanings and implications. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990; 112: 949–954.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jecker NS, Schneiderman LJ. Futility and rationing. Am. J. Med. 1992; 92: 189–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Brett AS, McCullough LB. When patients request specific interventions. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986; 15: 1347–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. McCrary SV, Swanson JW, Youngner SJ, Perkins JS, Winslade WI. Physicians’ quantitative assessments of medical futility. J. Clin. Ethics 1994; 5: 100–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gilgun v. Massachusetts General Hospital. Mass. Sup. Ct., April 21, 1995. (No. 92–4820).

    Google Scholar 

  84. In re Helga Wanglie, Fourth Judicial District (Dist. Ct., Probate Ct. Div.) PX-91–283. Minnesota, Hennepin County.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Angel M. The case of Helga Wanglie: A new kind of “right to die” case. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991; 325: 511–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Capron AM. Medical futility: Strike two. Hastings Ctr. Rep. 1994;September-October:42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of the futility movement. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 343: 293–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Halevy A, Brody BA. A multi-institutional collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA 1996; 276: 571–574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Tsai E. Should family members be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346: 1019–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE. Family participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1987; 16: 673–675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Dubin WR, Sarnoff JR. Sudden unexpected death: intervention with the survivors. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986; 15: 54–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Anderson AH, Bateman LH, Ingallinera KL, et al. Our caring continues: A bereavement follow-up program. Focus Crit. Care 1991; 18: 523–526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. McClelland ML. Our unit has a bereavement program. Am. J. Nurs. 1993; 93: 62–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. DeCastro LD. Exploitation in the use of subjects for medical experimentation: A re-examination of basic issues. Bioethics 1995; 9: 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283: 2701–2711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. US Food and Drug Administration. Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research; final rules. Fed. Regist. 1996;61:51,497–51,531

    Google Scholar 

  97. Moreno J, Caplan AL, Wolpe PR, and the Members of the Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. JAMA 1998; 280: 1951–1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Dresser R. Mentally disabled research subjects: The enduring policy issues. JAMA 1996; 276: 67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Capron AM. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999; 340: 1430–1434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. American College of Physicians. Cognitively impaired subjects. Ann. Intern. Med. 1989; 111: 843–848.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Biros MH, Lewis RJ, Olson CM, Runge JW, Cummins RO, Fost N. Informed consent in emergency research. Consensus statement from the coalition conference of acute resuscitation and critical care researchers. JAMA 1995; 273: 1283–1287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Levine RJ. Research in emergency situations. The role of deferred consent. JAMA 1995; 273: 1300–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jose I. Suarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart Youngner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Neurosciences Critical Care, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Jose I. Suarez MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suarez, J.I., Youngner, S. (2004). Bioethical Issues in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit. In: Suarez, J.I. (eds) Critical Care Neurology and Neurosurgery. Current Clinical Neurology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-660-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-660-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-660-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation