Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Practice ((CCP))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

Many physicians in clinical practice have not had formal training in statistics. A basic knowledge of certain aspects of statistics is essential for the physician densitometrist. Quality control procedures for the various machines require some statistical analyses. The computer-generated reports of bone density data include statistical devices such as T- and z-scores and confidence intervals. To interpret serial studies, the physician must understand the concept of precision and be able to calculate the precision of repeat measurements in his or her facility. These concepts and others are discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Phillips JL. Interpreting individual measures. In: Statistical Thinking. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1982:62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1005–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:221–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at difference skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1227–1233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles’, or vertebral fracture and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2445–2448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takada M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Grampp S, Jergas M, Gluer CC, Genant HK. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine. Radiology 1997;202:759–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen MA. Assessment of age and risk factors on bone density and bone turnover in healthy premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:123–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazess RB, Barden HS. Bone density in premenopausal women: effects of age, dietary intake, physical activity, smoking, and birth-control pills. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:132–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell MJ. Statistics at Square Two. London: BMJ Books, 2001:3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hirsch RP, Riegelman RK. Statistical Operations. Analysis of Health Research Data. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, Inc., 1996:9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanley JA, NcNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnosis systems. Science 1988;240:1285–1293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lydick E, Cook D, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C. Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Man Care 1998; 4:37–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galton F. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. J Anthropol Inst 1886;15:246–263.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bourke CJ, Daly LE, McGilvray J. Interpretation and uses of medical statistics. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1985:147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonnick SL. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: a vital tool or regression toward mediocrity? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3493–3495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W, et al. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry. Misleading changes and regression to the mean. JAMA 2000;283:1318–1321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonnick, S.L. (2004). Statistics in Densitometry. In: Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice. Current Clinical Practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-659-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-659-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4662-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-659-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics