Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations in the Multiplication of Human Embryos

  • Chapter
Book cover Reproduction, Technology, and Rights

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Although progress in the area of human reproduction continues to provide physicians and patients with increasingly successful means to solve infertility problems, significant difficulties remain. At present, no more than 30% of oocytes retrieved from a woman for in vitro fertilization (IVF) are likely to result in a pregnancy carried to term, with a national average term pregnancy rate of only 15.2% in 1991.1 However, a significant number of women cannot produce an adequate number of oocytes during any one cycle to ensure a firm likelihood of one of the oocytes being fertilized, implanted, and carried to term. Although we have drugs to stimulate oocyte production, many women produce only one or two eggs per 28-day cycle, and with IVF procedures ranging from $8000–12,000 for each attempt, couples are often unable to repeat these procedures. Two new reproductive techniques, blastomere separation and cloning, are currently being considered as treatment for women unable to produce an adequate amount of oocytes. The blastomere is the cell of the early cleaved embryo at the 2–32 cell stage. In October, 1993, the George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, DC reported having successfully duplicated genetically defective human embryos by blastomere separation.2,3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (1993) Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology generated from the American Fertility Society Registry. Fertil. Steril. 59 (5), 956–962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson, J. (1994) The question of human cloning. Hastings Center Report March—April, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steinbock, B. (1994) Ethical issues in human embryo research, University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Massey, J., Tucker, M., Malter, H., and Hall, J. (1994) Blastomere separation: potential for human investigation. Assisted Reprod. Rev. 4 (2), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tartowski, A. (1959) Experiments on the develpment of isolated blastomeres of mouse eggs. Nature 184, 1286, 1287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Willadsen, S. (1979) A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature 277, 298–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoxen, E. (1990) Historical perspectives on human embryo research, in Experiments on Embryos ( Dyson, A. and Harris, J., eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson, K. (1990) Introduction, in Embryo Experimentation ( Singer, P., Kuhse, H., Buckle, S., Dawson, K., and Kasimba, P., eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. xiii xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Ethics Comittee of the American Fertility Society (1986) Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies, Supplement 1. Fertil. Steril. 46 (3), 29s - 31s.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall, J. (1990) The case against experimentation, in Experiments on Embryos ( Dyson, A. and Harris, J., eds.), Routledge, New York, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolata, cited in B. Steinbock (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Massey et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman, F. (1978) Introductory Ethics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel, S. (1992) In What Price Parenthood?: Ethics and Assisted Reproduction (Campbell, C., ed.), Dartmouth, Brookfield, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roy, D. (1994) Ethics and Human Reproduction (unpublished manuscript), University of Montreal, Center for Bioethics, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, pp. 20, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson, J. (1992) In vitro conception and harm to the unborn, in What Price Parenthood?: Ethics and Assisted Reproduction (Campbell, C., ed.), Dartmouth, Brookfied, pp. 7, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society (1986), pp. 29s,30s.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roy, D., Williams, J., and Dickens, B. (1994) Bioethics in Canada, Prentice Hall, Scarborough.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.,p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.,p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.,p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Warnock, M. (1985) A Question of Life, Basil Blackwell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marshall, J. (1990) The case against experimentation, in Experiments on Embryos ( Dyson, A. and Harris, J., eds.), Routledge, New York, pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gaze, B., and Dawson, K. (1990) Who is the subject of the research?, in Embryo Experimentation ( Singer, P., Kuhse, H., Buckle, S., Dawson, K., and Kasimba, P., eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 109–144.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roy et al. (1994), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibson, K.G., Massey, J.B. (1996). Ethical Considerations in the Multiplication of Human Embryos. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Reproduction, Technology, and Rights. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-450-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-450-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-450-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics